Is UConn dying? | Page 12 | The Boneyard

Is UConn dying?

Status
Not open for further replies.
intlzncster said:
East coast basketball players have a different mentality than everyone else in the country?
Expand ...

If given the choice between playing 20-26 games a year where family and friends can attend or having to play in a conference and play in Wichita Kansas or Tulsa where are they going to choose? Not to mention our games are on ESPN U or ESPN News. Our conference doesn't have good national exposure.
 
Somewhere, Gene DeFilippo Jr. is laughing manically like Lord Voldemort after Moldyshorts got the Elder Wand upon reading this story...
 
Last edited:
intlzncster said:
Nova recruiting class rankings:

From 247
2016 - 45
2015 - 29
2014 - 48
2013 - 36
2012 - 27

From ESPN
2016 - 33
2015 - 24
2014 - 37
2013 - 31
2012 - >25

Those classes led to 2 National Championships.
Expand ...
Nova followed up their top 10 class this year with the #2 class next year. We currently have the #17th class, we had a nothing class this year (117th in the country) and 84th the year before. Our one major class was the Gilbert, Durham, Jackson, Diarra, Vital class of which three of the players were injured and two transferred.
 
.-.
UConn's brand IS basketball....nothing wrong with that...as Indiana's once was and Kentucky and Kansas' now are.

But circumstances seem to be pushing UConn fans in a way that they aren't for these other major state universities.

Tough times.....Fans are not without acuity. They see the risk is in becoming like Indiana, their Bob Knight days now long behind them, watching conference mates excelling in your brand sport as you fade from memory.

Or, on the other hand, protecting the brand by moving to what is essentially a one sport league and becoming an athletic program more like Nova or Marquette than Kansas.

Tough times....but winning in the AAC can push those thoughts back. Football will probably not catch up with UCF...but there is absolutely no reason that basketball can't be a conference champ and a national contender,
 
UConnNick said:
The author of that article ought to check his facts. UCONN was never an "FCS contender" as he suggests. In fact, the only real foray we ever made into the playoffs was in Skip Holtz's last season, when we squeaked by Hampton 42-34 only to get clobbered in the next round by Georgia Southern.
Expand ...

We beat that season's national champions twice that year. That counts as being a contender.
 
https://accountingoffice.uconn.edu/...tes/143/2017/12/2017-Financial-Statements.pdf

Link above to the 2017 financials. On an operating basis - the school loses $497M before state support / etc. Why this has devolved into a "let's kill XC as a way to save the university" conversation is beyond me.

The general state appropriation is $374M, and the debt service commitment from the state is $65M - so a total of $439M comes from the state each year. Of the $40M the athletic department loses, $9M comes from the students, so we are talking about $31M of the $439M coming from the state is devoted to supporting the athletic department.

Yes, the athletic department loses money. So does most of the rest of the school. I know this is a sports board, and I'm not suggesting that the AD shouldn't do whatever they can to close the gap. But to focus solely on sports is the wrong answer. You could kill the entire AD and it wouldn't solve the structural problem in a state that has an upside down budget. And at some point you take away enough money losing programs and it has a negative impact on the bottom line, as giving/applications/etc - decline...
 
superjohn said:
Nova followed up their top 10 class this year with the #2 class next year. We currently have the #17th class, we had a nothing class this year (117th in the country) and 84th the year before. Our one major class was the Gilbert, Durham, Jackson, Diarra, Vital class of which three of the players were injured and two transferred.
Expand ...
Also, Nova classes in that period did not have one-and-dones, and they did have guys like Ryan Arch and Josh Hart that played 4 years before graduating to the NBA. Recruiting class rankings value volume. Nova brought in fewer players in that period as their players stayed longer than typical for top programs.

It's also true that Jay has been successful in coaching up 3 and 4 stars to beat other program's 5 stars.
 
Slogged through 13 pages of this thing and pretty much every angle has been thoroughly beaten to death, with one possible exception - Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy.

Programs are being dropped at the lower levels due to increasing insurance premiums and the effect is sure to ripple upward…. For the NFL and all of football, a new threat: an evaporating insurance market

I say we get out ahead of this and become the first major division-one school to drop football; not because we stink, and can’t afford it, and it will never deliver us to a P5, but because of “our recognition of the increasingly indisputable evidence that the young men playing this game are being subjected to an unacceptable level of risk. The University of Connecticut simply cannot, in good conscience, continue to support this endeavor”

We come across as high-minded and principled, rather than incompetent, get national attention, and possibly end up on the right side of history.
 
Last edited:
UConn will never be able to win in the Big East, the competition is too difficult.
 
.-.
J187Money said:
https://accountingoffice.uconn.edu/...tes/143/2017/12/2017-Financial-Statements.pdf

Link above to the 2017 financials. On an operating basis - the school loses $497M before state support / etc. Why this has devolved into a "let's kill XC as a way to save the university" conversation is beyond me.

The general state appropriation is $374M, and the debt service commitment from the state is $65M - so a total of $439M comes from the state each year. Of the $40M the athletic department loses, $9M comes from the students, so we are talking about $31M of the $439M coming from the state is devoted to supporting the athletic department.

Yes, the athletic department loses money. So does most of the rest of the school. I know this is a sports board, and I'm not suggesting that the AD shouldn't do whatever they can to close the gap. But to focus solely on sports is the wrong answer. You could kill the entire AD and it wouldn't solve the structural problem in a state that has an upside down budget. And at some point you take away enough money losing programs and it has a negative impact on the bottom line, as giving/applications/etc - decline...
Expand ...

I wouldn’t say the school loses money... state support is just a big piece of their revenue and budget. Which is how it’s supposed to be.

Only one number matters going forward:

Where does that 439MM go?

$339MM? $239MM?

The tough decisions are going to above and beyond the AD.
 
Zissou said:
Also, Nova classes in that period did not have one-and-dones, and they did have guys like Ryan Arch and Josh Hart that played 4 years before graduating to the NBA. Recruiting class rankings value volume. Nova brought in fewer players in that period as their players stayed longer than typical for top programs.

It's also true that Jay has been successful in coaching up 3 and 4 stars to beat other program's 5 stars.
Expand ...
Yes, rankings also aren't the only thing to look at. Brunson, DiVincenzo, Spellman, and Bridges are all better than any players we've brought in the last 4 or 5 years. Alterique is the only guy we've had so far who could turn out to be at any of their level.
 
whaler11 said:
I wouldn’t say the school loses money... state support is just a big piece of their revenue and budget. Which is how it’s supposed to be.

Only one number matters going forward:

Where does that 439MM go?

$339MM? $239MM?

The tough decisions are going to above and beyond the AD.
Expand ...

That’s my point. The state supports athletics at the directional state Us. As well as the tech high schools which are run by the state. All of which lose money, if you want to characterize it that way. Intramurals lose money. Jorgensen likely loses money.

So the real question is: what is the appropriate level of state support and how best to spend the money. If you had a view into every penny the school spends you MIGHT conclude that athletics should be eliminated completely, or spared in favor of other cuts, or something in between. But none of us have that visibility. The incoming president has a lot of work to do.
 
J187Money said:
That’s my point. The state supports athletics at the directional state Us. As well as the tech high schools which are run by the state. All of which lose money, if you want to characterize it that way. Intramurals lose money. Jorgensen likely loses money.

So the real question is: what is the appropriate level of state support and how best to spend the money. If you had a view into every penny the school spends you MIGHT conclude that athletics should be eliminated completely, or spared in favor of other cuts, or something in between. But none of us have that visibility. The incoming president has a lot of work to do.
Expand ...

Yes the question at UConn is the balance between sports and academics.

The 40 million is only a few million more than they have been losing for ages.

The reason why it is an issue now is because a pretty solid straightforward case can be made they are losing additional money AND putting the basketball program at risk chasing a ship that sailed.
 
whaler11 said:
Yes the question at UConn is the balance between sports and academics.

The 40 million is only a few million more than they have been losing for ages.

The reason why it is an issue now is because a pretty solid straightforward case can be made they are losing additional money AND putting the basketball program at risk chasing a ship that sailed.
Expand ...

Since we "believe" we have solved the coaching situation in the short run, and we are currently sitting on the 11th ranked class in the country, I'll reserve my judgement on whether the basketball program is actually at risk. But I get your point.
 
.-.
superjohn said:
The fan base is clueless. They're worried about what things will look like in 20 years and think we're just fine sitting here until the next expansion when we'll get selected for a P5. We didn't get selected for a P5 back when we were winning basketball championships and going to the Fiesta bowl. They're sure to take us now that we have the worst football team in America and our basketball team sucks.
Expand ...

More significant than the decline of the sports is the decline of the state of Connecticut. Generally, flagship state universities are a prize for athletic conferences, as they have loyalty far beyond their alumni and student networks. If Connecticut were growing in population and wealth, and attracting young residents, UConn would look a lot more attractive.
 
J187Money said:
Since we "believe" we have solved the coaching situation in the short run, and we are currently sitting on the 11th ranked class in the country, I'll reserve my judgement on whether the basketball program is actually at risk. But I get your point.
Expand ...

Maybe it’s in the PDF you posted but I’d love to see the liability they are sitting on for deferred maintenance.

That’s going to be the scandal. They propped up cashflow... I guarantee there is a maintanence bubble that is going to pop.
 
whaler11 said:
Maybe it’s in the PDF you posted but I’d love to see the liability they are sitting on for deferred maintenance.

That’s going to be the scandal. They propped up cashflow... I guarantee there is a maintanence bubble that is going to pop.
Expand ...

Doesn't appear to be a maintenance bubble - but "Operations of maintenance and plant" has increased from $64M in 2008 to $137M in 2017. The downside of adding a ton of new buildings. (page 57 shows a 10 year expense trend).

I have to assume that athletics shows up in "auxiliary expenses"...which total $228M (up from $135M in 2008).

Overall expenses are up over $400M/year in the past 10 years. Insane.
 
And there are $446M of "deferred outflows" - but that appears to be mostly pension related.
 
J187Money said:
Doesn't appear to be a maintenance bubble - but "Operations of maintenance and plant" has increased from $64M in 2008 to $137M in 2017. The downside of adding a ton of new buildings. (page 57 shows a 10 year expense trend).

I have to assume that athletics shows up in "auxiliary expenses"...which total $228M (up from $135M in 2008).

Overall expenses are up over $400M/year in the past 10 years. Insane.
Expand ...

Well they got banged in that audit about moving cash away from maintenence to other projects - so I just have been assuming they doubled down on that tactic.

They grew in physical buildings at the worst time. Shrinking state with shrinking high school students... as virtual settings become more viable.

Let’s build stuff we can’t afford to maintain!
 
seriously... we're sitting here worrying about how the lawn looks while the house burns to the ground. if we don't fix the root of the problem the problem will only get worse. Lipstick on a pig might impress your friends but your the one who has to wake up in the morning..
 
.-.
evmore said:
seriously... we're sitting here worrying about how the lawn looks while the house burns to the ground. if we don't fix the root of the problem the problem will only get worse. Lipstick on a pig might impress your friends but your the one who has to wake up in the morning..
Expand ...

Exactly. The best part of waking up is Folgers in your cup. America runs on Dunkin, where's the beef?!?
 
Yardigan said:
Exactly. The best part of waking up is Folgers in your cup. America runs on Dunkin, where's the beef?!?
Expand ...
659076.jpg
 
Waquoit said:
We beat that season's national champions twice that year. That counts as being a contender.
Expand ...

Whoopee! For all of one season. The author leaves the impression that we were some kind of perennial powerhouse in DI-AA, which is laughable.
 
Crazy that this was my first thread ever and it blew up like this. Didn't expect that, although it is a very critical topic for UConn lovers to think about and discuss.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,213
Messages
4,557,371
Members
10,443
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom