Interesting article, Deseret News 9/19/16 | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Interesting article, Deseret News 9/19/16

Status
Not open for further replies.
Where in there was your statement as to whom we should have fired or what we can do that forces us to be admitted to a P-5 conference?
I have never said we should have fired anyone or that there is anything that we could do to force us to receive an invitation to a P5 conference (I don't even really know what that means tbh). Your questions are irrelevant and therefore do not merit an answer.
 
+1 I love my ignorebot. Apparently, there's multiple members of my penalty box active in this thread. I think that's a first for me.

Me too. I was always against putting people on ignore as I feel it messes up the flow of a thread. But since I've instituted it today on a couple of people I don't feel like I'm missing much. Should have done it a while ago.

The down side is that it appears BizLaw is just talking to imaginary friends.
 
Me too. I was always against putting people on ignore as I feel it messes up the flow of a thread. But since I've instituted it today on a couple of people I don't feel like I'm missing much. Should have done it a while ago.

The down side is that it appears BizLaw is just talking to imaginary friends.

Won't have been the first time. Probably won't be the last.
 
I have never said we should have fired anyone or that there is anything that we could do to force us to receive an invitation to a P5 conference (I don't even really know what that means tbh). Your questions are irrelevant and therefore do not merit an answer.
actually, the questions are very relevant to your position. your entire viewpoint, the only input you've made in fact, over and over and over in your 30-40 posts in the past 2 days is that Uconn needs to be more 'self-reflective' on why it isn't in a P5 conference and that it needs to correct it's previous decisions. which you included the hiring of Bob Diaco as one of those poor decisions.
That along with continuing to insult Uconn fans for not being able to look at the program's flaws.

so if your position is that Uconn has made the wrong decisions, Buslaw is asking what you think are the right decisions? What can Uconn do that they haven't already done to get into a P5? What are those flaws that we are so blinded by as Uconn fans?

You can ignore the questions, add your snarky remarks, and act like you have added value to the dialogue. but in the end, you are just a blow-hard that offers nothing to the conversation, except to play the contrarian. That doesn't play well and it gets boring.
 
.-.
Some time ago, there was a guy named okielite. He would pose a question, debate every single post on the thread while never really giving his position, get upset when UConn fans on a UConn board would have the audacity to speak highly of UConn, play a victim card while at the same time insult most of the posters here, and make posts while never actually holding a position of any sort whatsoever...except to be annoying. If it looks like an okie, smells like an okie, and posts like an okie, it's an okie.

Ignore.
 
LOL. You need to stop making things up as the posts are right there for everyone to read so they can tell you are wrong almost immediately. I get the feeling that you act like this toward anyone who doesn't share your opinion. Reeks of insecurity.

Maybe you should just put me on ignore so you can spend more time getting upset and playing the victim with somebody else as playing this game with me is not working out well for you.

I used to have some respect for you as I was impressed with you spending time to put together a resume of accomplishments. But now I see you are just like the rest of the whiners.

LAFFIN
 
Me too. I was always against putting people on ignore as I feel it messes up the flow of a thread.

That was me a while back. But I started slow and found it didn't hurt a bit. I just checked and I'm up to 52.
 
That was me a while back. But I started slow and found it didn't hurt a bit. I just checked and I'm up to 52.

Lol 52 on ignore? I can't name 52 posters on this site. (I know we have many more than that but I am the kind of person who is bad with names... And memory recall. Could be the 8 concussions...)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,214
Messages
4,557,444
Members
10,442
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom