You had numerous posts on how Miller should not have been fired and how Chill wasn’t an upgrade and you are always trying to discredit the brilliant Blaze strategy, which Chill had a critical role in formulating.
This is a blatant lie. You are lying.
I searched through all of the threads with "Chillious" in the title on this website, and here's what I came up with:
The Preppy Pipeline | Columbia Sports Journalism
If this is to be believed, JC once recommended Chillious as a candidate for the head job at South Kent. Pretty interesting.
Bringing the fact that Jim Calhoun thought highly enough of Chill to recommend him for the HC spot at one of the top prep schools in the country to the board's attention in no way jives with any of the things you accuse me of.
Just for yuks, I searched through my posting history for all posts containing "Chillious" or "Chill," and found the following:
2018 Recruiting: - Isaiah Mucius sets official visits <-- Here I am angrily shutting down another user's demand that Miller be rehired, and lambasting him for insinuating that Miller would be an upgrade as a recruiter.
Mathis to Rutgers <-- Implying that during the spring/summer dry spell, Chill was single-handedly getting us into final lists, and that it was other coaches who weren't pulling their weight (not him).
2018 Recruiting: - Emmitt Matthews Jr Commits to UConn <-- When young people say "(So and so) ain't playing around," it means that they are highly impressed with that person.
Amore: Crumbling Connecticut Foundation? Kevin Ollie Under Scrutiny With UConn Men <-- And here, we have you
complimenting me for a post refuting the narrative that firing Miller cost us MAL, and proclaiming that if Miller were a better recruiter he would have schools above DIII interested in his services.
This isn't even considering all of the posts I made bashing those who criticized Chill after Blake Harris and Mamoudou Diarra committed elsewhere.
TL;DR -- sit down.