Indiana Daily Hoosier having a sip whine before the game | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Indiana Daily Hoosier having a sip whine before the game

Indiana is the lower seed so they have no gripe if they have to play the higher seed in their home state. Not sure why they are complaining on behalf of NC State. If NC State has an issue with it let them speak for themselves.
this is just a guess but I don't think that Wes Moore really cares if he has to play UCONN or Indiana in Bridgeport or on the planet Mars.........I take that back........Moore just complained that Mars has zero atmosphere........
 
Has everyone forgotten that Indiana has a super cheerleader that can leap tall buildings with a single bound and can rescue basketballs that get stuck above the backboard? That more than negates any home court advantage. When was the last time UConn played in Bridgeport anyway?
The last time Uconn played a Regional in Bridgeport was 2018.

The last time Uconn played in a Regional not in Albany or Bridgeport was 2014 (not counting last year).
 
"Up next is 11-time national champion UConn in a game to be played in of all places — Connecticut. The No. 2 seed Huskies will play just an hour from their campus in Bridgeport following a decision by the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee that doesn’t make much sense. Should the Huskies advance past IU and into the regional final, they will have a major home court advantage over No. 1 seed N.C. State. The Committee explained their decision was based on the seeding of the No. 2 seeds, that is, the overall No. 1 is paired with the worst No. 2, and so on. But there is no hard and fast rule mandating such an approach, and that logic doesn’t hold much water in this case. UConn’s home court advantage will more than erase any unscientific and intangible differences between the No. 2 seeds. Simply put, UConn should have been shipped off elsewhere — anywhere but Bridgeport. But there is no changing that now, and UConn’s home court is Indiana’s problem first."
Every team thinks this is a bad idea until they play well enough to have the game in their own geography.
 
The student newspaper at IU was quite good when I did my postgraduate work there in the late 70s. The Journalism school at the time was very well regarded.
 
.-.
The last time Uconn played a Regional in Bridgeport was 2018.

The last time Uconn played in a Regional not in Albany or Bridgeport was 2014 (not counting last year).
I have said this before, it is going to be hard for UConn fans when regionals are not local 3 of the next 4 years, as the NCAA transitions to just 2 regional sites. Assuming strong teams remain strong, the year in Albany will be good for UConn fans, the year in Greenville good for the Carolina schools (that's next year), Albany the following, Birmingham (LSU?) and the 4th year Fort Worth (Texas, Baylor, etc.). The west coast sites are in Washington, Oregon and Cali, so other than Stanford don't know any team would have a real advantage.

As someone noted, this is from the student newspaper. Take it for what its worth, I thought UConn earned the Bridgeport Regional by the geographic factor that is applied to the higher seed lines, although this season it didn't seem to play out much otherwise.
 
Much ado about nothing.

If the Washington Post had not make this a "clause celeb" nobody would really care.

As to regional sites, the women's game tried that before and they did not get the fannies in the seats.

Sorry, don't agree...WaPo is just jumping on the obvious bandwagon
Recall that almost up until the end, Creme had us away in various sites
And I noted on several occasions that if we were to be sent to the boonies, this would be the year.

I know many posters thinks it's all about the money...if that's really the reason, the NCAA is even more cynical than I thought...Or perhaps I'm just naïve.

You can't help folks from complaining about what is obviously an advantage for us...Why would anyone argue that it's not?

In the decade or more that I've followed the team and participated in the site, I've been to Albany, Philly, Trenton, some place in Rhode Island and Bridgeport...It's certainly a semi-home site and will be chock full of enthusiastic UConn fans

But you still have to win the games
 
This is a UCONN board, so the responses here are to be expected and my opinion to be unpopular. But I’m used to being pounded here so, here’s my take.

There should be no such thing as a home game in this tournament. I understand that the Womens side is not yet as popular and tickets need to be sold but we have reached the point where the first 2 rounds should be on a neutral court. If roles were reversed and we had to play the last game on UCF’s home court, the whining here would have rusted my iPad.

Regionals will change and that’s a good thing.

College playoffs in the major sports; baseball and softball World Series, football playoffs, Frozen Four, are neutral sites unless a local team makes it. There should be no home games in this Tournament.
The solution (not that it would stop the whining) would be to send all of the top 12 seeds to the farthest site possible and then continue that (to the extent possible) all through the rest of the bracket. Of course, this would result in a far more expensive (and less profitable) tournament. $$$ Money $$$ unfortunately, is behind virtually all the decisions that are made regarding the NCAA tournament and it’s difficult to imagine that changing anytime soon.
 
Indiana is the lower seed so they have no gripe if they have to play the higher seed in their home state. Not sure why they are complaining on behalf of NC State. If NC State has an issue with it let them speak for themselves.
Well, NC State coach Wes Moore actually did cryptically call it the 'Geno Invitational' when he was informed of the regional brackets. I'd say he might have an issue with it.
 
I have said this before, it is going to be hard for UConn fans when regionals are not local 3 of the next 4 years, as the NCAA transitions to just 2 regional sites. Assuming strong teams remain strong, the year in Albany will be good for UConn fans, the year in Greenville good for the Carolina schools (that's next year), Albany the following, Birmingham (LSU?) and the 4th year Fort Worth (Texas, Baylor, etc.). The west coast sites are in Washington, Oregon and Cali, so other than Stanford don't know any team would have a real advantage.

As someone noted, this is from the student newspaper. Take it for what its worth, I thought UConn earned the Bridgeport Regional by the geographic factor that is applied to the higher seed lines, although this season it didn't seem to play out much otherwise.
I suspect they’ll abandon this policy when they make the decision that playing in empty arenas is bad for the game.
 
.-.
I have said this before, it is going to be hard for UConn fans when regionals are not local 3 of the next 4 years, as the NCAA transitions to just 2 regional sites. Assuming strong teams remain strong, the year in Albany will be good for UConn fans, the year in Greenville good for the Carolina schools (that's next year), Albany the following, Birmingham (LSU?) and the 4th year Fort Worth (Texas, Baylor, etc.). The west coast sites are in Washington, Oregon and Cali, so other than Stanford don't know any team would have a real advantage.

As someone noted, this is from the student newspaper. Take it for what its worth, I thought UConn earned the Bridgeport Regional by the geographic factor that is applied to the higher seed lines, although this season it didn't seem to play out much otherwise.
Stanford will only have an advantage the year Regionals are in Sacramento. Sacramento is about the same distance from Stanford as Bridgeport is from Storrs.

Portland is about the same distance from Stanford as Storrs is from Greensboro.

Spokane is about 900 miles away, and Seattle about 840 miles, from Stanford.
 
I do think many of you are missing the point of the complaint. It is appropriate for the #1 seeds to have a home court advantage because they earned it. But in Bridgeport this year the #2 seed has the home court advantage and the #1 does not. To which I say NC State should have played well enough to have earned the Greensboro seed. They didn't so its time to be quiet and play the game.

Indiana as a #3 seed doesn't have a complaint because they wouldn't have the home court anyway.
 
Serious questions:

How many points is playing in Bridgeport worth? Bridgeport will have a pro UConn crowd but it is not a “home court” like Gampel.

Also, how many points was home court in Gampel worth?

Do sites quantify such things?
Home field advantage for UConn is 3.01 points per Massey. IIRC, home court is Gampel or Hartford, but not Mohegan.

The quote in the OP is in like the gazzilionth paragraph of a student newspaper. Take it for what it's worth.
 
.-.
"Up next is 11-time national champion UConn in a game to be played in of all places — Connecticut. The No. 2 seed Huskies will play just an hour from their campus in Bridgeport following a decision by the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee that doesn’t make much sense. Should the Huskies advance past IU and into the regional final, they will have a major home court advantage over No. 1 seed N.C. State. The Committee explained their decision was based on the seeding of the No. 2 seeds, that is, the overall No. 1 is paired with the worst No. 2, and so on. But there is no hard and fast rule mandating such an approach, and that logic doesn’t hold much water in this case. UConn’s home court advantage will more than erase any unscientific and intangible differences between the No. 2 seeds. Simply put, UConn should have been shipped off elsewhere — anywhere but Bridgeport. But there is no changing that now, and UConn’s home court is Indiana’s problem first."
I do like being referred to as "Murderer's Row."
 
Wasn't Oklahoma on their home court when they gave up 105 points to a very young Notre Dame team who have mostly never been to an ncaa tournament before? The okies had many fans screaming for them to prevail. People say that Stanford has a home court advantage all the way up in Spokane, Washington. It must be close to 1,000 miles north of their campus and two states away. Uconn hardly ever plays in Bridgeport and the court there is the same size as the one in Indiana. Suck it up buttercup.
And don't forget Creighton knocking off Caitlyn Clark and Iowa right in the middle of the Hawkeyes' home court.... And LSU buried by OSU on their homecourt.. Homecourt isn't automatic...
 
Sorry, don't agree...WaPo is just jumping on the obvious bandwagon
Recall that almost up until the end, Creme had us away in various sites
And I noted on several occasions that if we were to be sent to the boonies, this would be the year.

I know many posters thinks it's all about the money...if that's really the reason, the NCAA is even more cynical than I thought...Or perhaps I'm just naïve.

You can't help folks from complaining about what is obviously an advantage for us...Why would anyone argue that it's not?

In the decade or more that I've followed the team and participated in the site, I've been to Albany, Philly, Trenton, some place in Rhode Island and Bridgeport...It's certainly a semi-home site and will be chock full of enthusiastic UConn fans

But you still have to win the games
Kingston..R.I at URI
 
Stanford will only have an advantage the year Regionals are in Sacramento. Sacramento is about the same distance from Stanford as Bridgeport is from Storrs.

Portland is about the same distance from Stanford as Storrs is from Greensboro.

Spokane is about 900 miles away, and Seattle about 840 miles, from Stanford.
Actually, I forgot about other PAC teams that might be in that regional. I sort of know the distances, I don't fly so we have driven from Arizona to Spokane, Portland and Sacramento. All cool places.

My wife and I don't mind the NCAA trying this BUT we thought it was ridiculous to put the "west" site actually on the west coast. Vegas? Denver? I don't know, but in that regard this is an odd decision - the so called east sites are not all on the coast, even though the first 2 are close.
 
Putting South Carolina in Greensboro, North Carolina is giving them a Home court advantage. Anyone who tries to argue otherwise is not being honest. Should people complain about South Carolina? Would it be more fair to have South Carolina in Bridgeport and UCONN in Greensboro?
Also what is the big deal about the home court.... It did not help Baylor, Iowa, and others.
Lets just play the game...
Exactly. In fact, North Carolina will have more of an advantage than even S.C. because Chapel Hill is only 50 miles from Greensboro, yet no one is talking about that!! I guess because no one expected that N.C. would make it to the Sweet Sixteen. ;)
 
.-.
A home team gains two major things from a "home court". 1) There is a sense of familiarity/comfort level players get. 2) The crowd will "favor" the home team. That's it.

Bridgeport is not the UConn home court. UConn does not play in Bridgeport, so there is nothing gained in terms of familiarity. UConn does gain the favor of the crowd.

Iowa fans favored their team winning, but the Iowa team did not (as it turned out) take "advantage" and lost. Oklahoma, the same. UConn did not take "advantage" being the crowd favorite when they lost to Villanova at home. The US Men's soccer team plays at home in Texas but the crowd favors the opponent Mexico. Who has the advantage? Is it a "home field" advantage?

The crowd will favor UConn, that is it. UConn players have to make the baskets and Indiana was given the right to have referees who will "try" and make the rules apply the same to both teams. What's the problem?
 
Its gonna come down to UConns defense and weak side help. We have a bunch of really good guards and alot of depth at every position. The only way I see UConn being beat is if they beat themselves. This game could get ugly pretty quickly if UConn comes out on fire. The one thing we have been waiting for since Paiges return is to see Paige get back to where she was before she got hurt. This weekend we may see that.
 
I don't think we would have beaten UCF if we weren't playing at home....or close to it.
One will never know, perhaps UConn could have won by a greater margin "if" UConn did not play at home ...or close to it. Funny, "if" works both ways.

1648131855418.png
 
Well, NC State coach Wes Moore actually did cryptically call it the 'Geno Invitational' when he was informed of the regional brackets. I'd say he might have an issue with it.
NC State had the opportunity to win their way into the Wes Invitational Greensboro regional.

In 2019, he was in Greensboro with Baylor, Iowa, and SC. Both NC State and SC lost pretty handily on the first day.

Pack your bags and play your games.

And I know that people are flustered, but the pairing with NC State legitimately followed the S-curve and Bridgeport is their closest available regional site. It might suck, but there isn't really anything too eyebrow raising.
 
Just a reminder that in NCAA Baseball/softball, all games before the college World Series are played on the campus of the top seed.

Massive home field advantage.

This whole UConn hole court advantage is ridiculously overblown
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,333
Messages
4,564,925
Members
10,464
Latest member
Rollskies27


Top Bottom