That white bald guy/ref(?) at the GB game was clueless. What he was doing there was simply an affront to everything BBall. Appalling.![]()


Could very well be me. I'm white, bald, and many people consider me clueless. And I was at the GB game.Just to be clear, when you say "that white bald guy at the Green bay game was clueless",
you're not talking about meyers7, slug23, Fairview, HiDribble, UcMiami or DavidinNaples...right?
(This will make more sense when dannykuconn posts the Boneyard party photos...)
Go Boneyarders..!!

aha! and you were wearing a striped shirt?Could very well be me. I'm white, bald, and many people consider me clueless. And I was at the GB game.![]()
No, that wasn't the case. The head ref was the one who called the T. It wasn't innocently stepping over the line. It should have been a technical foul.There are actually two different violations while defending a throw-in that lead to a technical. The first is for the defender to reach over the line and touch the ball - automatic technical. But the other is more of a judgment call - "repeatedly" crossing the boundary line during a throw-in. Thus it is not necessarily the "correct call" to issue a technical foul for stepping over the end line while guarding a player who is inbounding the ball. It should be really flagrant or be repeated multiple times - not just a player innocently stepping on the line. I didn't see the RU game, but is it possible the refs didn't award any FT's because, after discussion, the head referee decided that it really wasn't a violation that should result in a technical foul?
Ah, no, well maybe it wasn't me.aha! and you were wearing a striped shirt?
I saw that pic of you folks at the game. Are you sure???Ah, no, well maybe it wasn't me.

wait wait wait! I was sipping tea as I read this and didn't have my pinky extended...
ok, go!
That is four strikes, Meyers, mebbe 5 counging the shirt. I reckon you are out.Could very well be me. I'm white, bald, and many people consider me clueless. And I was at the GB game.![]()