- Joined
- Nov 10, 2014
- Messages
- 416
- Reaction Score
- 2,933
Bottom line - a team cannot produce the defensive numbers UConn did this year and not make changes. It may be the defensive coordinator this year but if next year is as bad it will be the head coach.
Perhaps Crocker is the scapegoat. If the defense is still as a bad next year then we'll know it was not all Crocker. But to argue Crocker did not need to be removed is just silly.
Crocker always seemed like a good guy and on a personal level I feel bad for him. But football is a business and the defense can't fail like they did this year and not make major leadership changes.
It is easy for DiMauro to make straw man excuses.....bad conference, northeast recruiting, apathetic fanbase, etc... But, at the end of the year, a defense is what it's numbers say you are....why the defense failed is not important. All that matters is the defense failed on a historic level and Crocker was at the helm.
Perhaps Crocker is the scapegoat. If the defense is still as a bad next year then we'll know it was not all Crocker. But to argue Crocker did not need to be removed is just silly.
Crocker always seemed like a good guy and on a personal level I feel bad for him. But football is a business and the defense can't fail like they did this year and not make major leadership changes.
It is easy for DiMauro to make straw man excuses.....bad conference, northeast recruiting, apathetic fanbase, etc... But, at the end of the year, a defense is what it's numbers say you are....why the defense failed is not important. All that matters is the defense failed on a historic level and Crocker was at the helm.