- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 10,020
- Reaction Score
- 38,766
Let me help...
I saw the 1st half & some of the 2nd. Not sure how bad Akron is but Illinois looked really good. Saturday won't be pretty at all.
Let me help...
better than the 63-3 score I read. Some people want to be miserable
Kind of a stupid post. Big improvement from last yearWe are miserable. If you’re truly a UConn fan, then so should you. We would get destroyed by just about every team in the FBS. The product we’ve been seeing on the field is embarrassing.
Kind of???Kind of a stupid post. Big improvement from last year
As long as we come out and play with some pride, we've got a chance. We do that I see a time expiring game winning FG. Huskies win 21-20
Kind of a stupid post. Big improvement from last year
Beer stein stop power drinking and come back to earthI believe the plan is 9 safeties and one fg, which is as realistic a way to win as any for this team.
Both teams on balance have good defenses, UConn though has the better offensive line. Illinois though has the better QB, at least right now. I do agree that it will be a low scoring game. UConn has a chance but absolutely can't have any turnovers.I have been saying since mid-summer that I thought Illinois could well be one of the Huskies' 3-4 wins this season. Mainly because the Illini are a Lovie Smith team that has under-achieved and they will be playing at the Rent. After Thursday night I am no longer so sure. But I won't give up on UConn just yet. I say it will be an ugly, close, controversial win on a field goal with less than a minute remaining.
Huskies 16
Illini 14
Both teams on balance have good defenses
Do you post as much on any BC board?Really? UConn has gone from a historically bad defense to being good?
Good? Yes, I think so, much better than last year. I think they are good enough and speedy enough to try blitzing a little bit, only problem there is Edsall plays too conservative even when he has the players. Uguak is playing good, so is Travis, Dillon Harris, Kevon, Morgan. I thought Keyshawn Paul played great, Coyle. They miss Thomas though. Spanos still has some work to do though on teaching some of the DB's how to tackle, jarring the ball loose with a helmet hit on short passes and crossing routes. They're better than last year but still need some work. I'm hoping they do well next week, as Illinois's offensive line did not impress me defending Akron's pass rush.Really? UConn has gone from a historically bad defense to being good?
Do you post as much on any BC board?
No, but I think that is you only purpose in coming here and no, UConn has stunk it up for years. Enjoy your fun Hank.754 posts over 8 years, less than 100 posts per year so under two per week. Yes I post far less here.
Does my asking a question bother you? Do you think UConn has a "good" defense this year?
1 game in versus Wagner is not enough for me to call it good. The numbers suggest a good game but the Wagner QB was not good at all. The D gave up a 55 yard TD. Huge plays like that were common place last year. That Wagner got one is enough for me to hold off on the good declaration.Good? Yes, I think so, much better than last year. I think they are good enough and speedy enough to try blitzing a little bit, only problem there is Edsall plays too conservative even when he has the players. Uguak is playing good, so is Travis, Dillon Harris, Kevon, Morgan. I thought Keyshawn Paul played great, Coyle. They miss Thomas though. Spanos still has some work to do though on teaching some of the DB's how to tackle, jarring the ball loose with a helmet hit on short passes and crossing routes. They're better than last year but still need some work. I'm hoping they do well next week, as Illinois's offensive line did not impress me defending Akron's pass rush.
Yes you can, as long as it's not helmet to helmet. If the defender first makes contact with his shoulder and gets his helmet up and under the ball, targeting will not be called.1 game in versus Wagner is not enough for me to call it good. The numbers suggest a good game but the Wagner QB was not good at all. The D gave up a 55 yard TD. Huge plays like that were common place last year. That Wagner got one is enough for me to hold off on the good declaration.
And a helmet hit will get you called for targeting. You can’t lower your head.
Leading with crown on any part of the body in targeting. First contact with shoulder is fine.Yes you can, as long as it's not helmet to helmet. If the defender first makes contact with his shoulder and gets his helmet up and under the ball, targeting will not be called.
Maybe TD + 2 point conversion (8) + TD (15) + FG (18) + FG (21)?I believe the plan is 9 safeties and one fg, which is as realistic a way to win as any for this team.
That's the trick, if you make contact first lower down with the left shoulder you still can use the helmet to pop the ball out when you hit him. Or just hope the ref can't tell from his angle. LolLeading with crown on any part of the body in targeting. First contact with shoulder is fine.