Illinois Post Game Thread | Page 16 | The Boneyard
.-.

Illinois Post Game Thread

Interesting… so the rabbit hole goes deeper. Love the picture. How do we go from 30 (when it should have been 20) on the clock at 2:32 to 19 at 2:29? If you measure it from this moment in time then it never would have been a shot clock violation at all, but they still did initially reset the shot clock upon Reibe’s possession of the rebound at 2:32.
I just put a stopwatch to when the ball was secured by Reibe to when Malachi was fouled. 21.5 seconds. The foul and made shot were not in time at least according to actual time and not factoring in clock reset errors.
 
Last edited:
I just put a stopwatch to when the ball was secured by Reibe to when Malachi was fouled. 21.5 seconds. The foul and made shot were not in time at least according to actual time and not factoring in clock reset errors.
I agree with that, but the whole reset to 30 seconds followed by a countdown from 20 appears to be standard when preparing for a defensive rebound while the ball hasn’t been secured yet. The clock operator reset to 20 on the shot clock a second or two after Reibe already secured it. So the actual time elapsed was 21.5, like you said, but per the sloppy clock operation it was under 20 (is what I’ve gathered, anyway). The whole thing was a mess.
 
I just put a stopwatch to when the ball was secured by Reibe to when Malachi was fouled. 21.5 seconds. The foul and made shot were not in time at least according to actual time and not factoring in clock reset errors.
Love the depth and creative analysis the BY will go to on any single incident. This is becoming an all time epic BY commentary subject. Imagine if the call had gone the other way.
 
Love the depth and creative analysis the BY will go to on any single incident. This is becoming an all time epic BY commentary subject. Imagine if the call had gone the other way.
That was my primary motivation trying to get to the bottom of it. If UConn were down by 7 with some momentum with over two minutes left, I’d have faith they could win a game like that. I would’ve been irate if that happened in reversed roles and the explanation was so poor.
 
That was my primary motivation trying to get to the bottom of it. If UConn were down by 7 with some momentum with over two minutes left, I’d have faith they could win a game like that. I would’ve been irate if that happened in reversed roles and the explanation was so poor.
I was grumpy yesterday. Don’t mind me. Was going to DM you. Decided to do it in the open instead. I was being a d o u c h e. Salute to you . Go Huskies
 
.-.
I was grumpy yesterday. Don’t mind me. Was going to DM you. Decided to do it in the open instead. I was being a d o u c h e. Salute to you . Go Huskies
That is really healthy accountability right there. Too much trypotphan?
 
I was grumpy yesterday. Don’t mind me. Was going to DM you. Decided to do it in the open instead. I was being a d o u c h e. Salute to you . Go Huskies
No worries bro I promise I understand your passion. Go Huskies
 
I just put a stopwatch to when the ball was secured by Reibe to when Malachi was fouled. 21.5 seconds. The foul and made shot were not in time at least according to actual time and not factoring in clock reset errors.
I was hoping they'd give us the ball out of bounds with 2 seconds. Pleasantly surprised they counted it, and would be upset if I was an Illinois fan for sure. There is some human reaction time setting the shot clock, especially now that it's either 20 or 30 depending on who gets it, but if the refs were to go to a stopwatch, they'd probably have to eliminate that element.

Reibe also probably fouled on the rebound reaching over the top of a guy, and that could have cut it to 5 - and then things are getting a little hairy. We'll get better at not playing with our food - just needed to hit some of the open looks we were getting to finish them off. That was what we did down the stretch against Purdue - milked the shot clock, and finished the play. Even while Edey was going off with Clingan in foul trouble, we matched them basket for basket and it never got below 13.
 
.-.
hurley was pretty clear that he was not 100% and pretty much the only reason he played was to give reibe a break.

If hurley wasn't happy with his focus,he would have said so.
My comment was more particularly about him being engaged or as you would say focus. I did mention his injuries that seem to set him back. Now he is able to run but not at full strength and we hardly threw the ball down low to him in the 1st half. He tends to get down on himself when this happens even when he is healthy. I don't think at this point Hurley would mention his lack of focus when he/Tarris has other obstacles to get over. Once his conditioning gets better he will get the ball much more and you should see a much more engaged Tarris Reed. It would not be a good motivating comment if Hurley had mentioned the "focus".
 
Now he is able to run but not at full strength and we hardly threw the ball down low to him in the 1st half.

The problem with the armchair psychology is that Hurley explicitly referenced this in his post-game and made it sound as if getting the ball to Tarris on an island to let him take someone one on one was not an option yesterday due to his injury.
 
Love the depth and creative analysis the BY will go to on any single incident. This is becoming an all time epic BY commentary subject. Imagine if the call had gone the other way.
I think the refs made a bunch of questionable calls in Illinois favor leading up to that point to try to stop the game from getting out of hand and to be more exciting for TV, and they felt guilty taking away that basket after all of that so they didn’t.

Its on the refs to notice on a rebound if there is a shot clock resetting incorrectly and they didn’t notice. Had there not been a foul
on that play would it have gone completely unnoticed?
 
I think the refs made a bunch of questionable calls in Illinois favor leading up to that point to try to stop the game from getting out of hand and to be more exciting for TV, and they felt guilty taking away that basket after all of that so they didn’t.

Its on the refs to notice on a rebound if there is a shot clock resetting incorrectly and they didn’t notice. Had there not been a foul
on that play would it have gone completely unnoticed?
I think Underwood was screaming about it and ultimately helped bring it to their attention. Although he could’ve been protesting a no call that could’ve been Reibe over-the-back (I was braced for a whistle on the rebound and obviously so glad it didn’t come).
 
The way you phrase it sounds like a 70s weekly drama.
The name rang a bell and now I remember:

 
Understand the back and forth on Smith's 4 point play. Refs are calling it like they see/saw it. Part of the game. I'll just say over the last few years we've had a fair amount of "judgment calls" go against us. Nice to have a call go to the Good Guys. It all evens out over the course of a season. The Law of Large Numbers. Pretty decent reflexes by Smith to get off the shot-with the bench telling him to shoot it- with a big dude in his face and even get it close to the basket-let alone make it.

No interest in debating. Just an opinion.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Times Square is popular even though it objectively sucks. Maybe Austin was cool once upon a time but now It’s a sweltering, congested sub-metropolis full of yuppies that believe they invented the breakfast taco. Take Nashville but replace all the bachelorettes with tech bros and you get Austin.

Times Square is surrounded by the finest group of theaters in the country, many believe the world. It's packed because thousands and thousands of people descend on it every night to watch hundreds of world class actors in dozens of incredible plays.

It does not objectively suck unless you're looking for a bar with a DJ.
 
Times Square is surrounded by the finest group of theaters in the country, many believe the world. It's packed because thousands and thousands of people descend on it every night to watch hundreds of world class actors in dozens of incredible plays.

It does not objectively suck unless you're looking for a bar with a DJ.
I specifically said Times Square which is a major tourist destination in and of itself, ball drop etc. I didn’t say Broadway/the theater district. I’ll be going to see a show 3 weeks from tomorrow FYI.

PS- the title of this thread is “Illinois post game”
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
398
Guests online
9,684
Total visitors
10,082

Forum statistics

Threads
165,431
Messages
4,437,893
Members
10,298
Latest member
Lapdog


Top Bottom