CocoHusky
1,000,001 BY points
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
- Messages
- 17,203
- Reaction Score
- 73,827
I'm rather surprised by the separation given these two things- better rebounding and becoming top offensive team in the nation.There are two conversations that appear to be getting mixed. UConn got beaten by South Carolina in Finals but to me this is an anomaly due to: 1. Boston-when playing the top center in the country, odds are you will get outrebounded. 2. Injuries and illness to many of the top 6 UConn players. UConn wasn't a great rebounding team during the year, but not our #1 issue during the other 35 games.
Its rare that the top shooting teams (i.e. Golden State Warriors, Boston Celtics, etc.) are the top rebounding teams. They are usually adequate-not top 5 but top10. Rather than some that are focused solely on rebounding, not sure why there isn't more focus on becoming the top offensive team in the US. Yes, we can do better on rebounding but we don't have Boston. We do have Paige, Azzi, etc.
Better rebounding includes offensive rebounds which are usually close to your own basket and can make many high percentage shots. SC collected 21 Offensive rebounds in the championship game.
More importantly without adequate defensive rebounds UCONN is unable to ignite the transition game where the defense is on their heels. It would be very helpful for UCONN to return to a top offensive team in the nation if UCONN was not going up against a set defense on the majority of the offensive possessions.
Equating the SC rebounding advantage in the recent games to only Boston is a little bit sketchy. SC out rebounded UCONN in 4 of the 5 starting defensive matchups and top 2 subs in the final game so it was not just Boston . By contrast in the FF game against Stanford UCONN was able to win 3 of the 5 starting rebounding matchups and decisively won the first two subs matchup with Nika and Evina collecting 8 and 6 rebounds respectively.
