- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,156
- Reaction Score
- 1,694
Boston isn't necessarily a soft market, at least not in the way I think you're referring to it. For college football and basketball, BC, UConn, and straggling ND fans are really the only game in town. It's not like NYC where there's multiple other schools with large alumni bases and big athletic programs. The problem here is, there aren't that many people who really care much about college football or basketball to begin with, both are massively overshadowed by the pros, and the population isn't large enough like in NYC, where there's enough people who casually watch it to make up for that interest gap.
should have clairified "soft". I meant "soft" interest in its "home college conference" ACC (as in very soft). New York could be considered "partially soft Big 10" with Rutgers' move. Detroit would be "strong Big 10", LA "strong Pac 12", Houston/Dallas "strong split Big 12/SEC; Atlanta strong SEC, soft ACC, etc. (for purposes of this exercise, excluding ND and concede it has a footprint everywhere). Philly would be "strong Big 10" w/Penn State & now Rutgers. The brilliance of the Big 10 in taking Rutgers is not only shown in them getting a bigger chunk of NY and Philly market, but also in taking Maryland, which steals Baltimore from the ACC and takes about half the ACC from Washington (more if either of the Virginias go).
The larger point is medium-to-big TV markets (like Hartford-New Haven) are like real estate. They're not making any more of them. So while I hate the waiting around crap, I would think the odds are that some brilliant person (like Delany) will open their eyes at some point. I would however, prefer, the demographic info alleged to have been shared in the tweet in the OP would have come from OUR people.