- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,049
- Reaction Score
- 47,646
I agree. if we were winning with Diaco's approach, we'd be happy and possibly in favor of it. I just see to many coaching errors to believe Diaco could win with this style. it's a style that doesn't leave much margin for error. Therefore, you can't have the coaching disasters we have like we did against Navy at the 1 yard line. At the very least you have to win 50 percent of the toss up games. I mean, looking back it took a coaching disaster on the part of UVA to pull that one out.I'm torn on this point. I believe that defense wins games and championships, and that offensive minded coaches tend to fail over time. Witness Chip Kelly, Charlie Weis, etc. Verducci's scheme is not that conservative, it's designed to be efficient, get first downs and possess the ball, allowing the defense to rest and get the ball back. As I've said, it's essentially a simpler version of the Patriots offense, but lacks the players to execute it, especially at QB. There are frequently open players who don't get the ball.
The defensive philosophy is also similar, with Belichick playing a bend don't break field position game all the time. I suspect that Diaco got that from Al Groh, a protegee of Parcells. Again, I see challenges in player execution, and also a lack of flexibility and adaptation on D. That's my biggest gripe on Diaco, the defense doesn't do enough to confuse and disguise its looks and he doesn't adjust quickly enough. Syracuse burned us over and over, with no switch in the secondary. We kept rushing more than 4 against UCF despite a slippery field and elusive QB. We beat the OL time and time again but couldn't get to the QB.
If this team doesn't beat ECU, I will expect Donovan Williams to suit up and play and I'll expect the defense to be more aggressive and hopefully to show a wider range of looks. There's noting left to lose.
Diaco's style would seem to call for him to be outstanding in end of half situations and he is he exact opposite on both offense and defense .