It's that simple.Attendance isn't low because of ticket prices.
Attendance is low because people have decided they have things they would prefer to do.
You could open up the gates for Temple and make all the seating first come/first serve and be lucky to get 22k in the stadium.
But this is mainly because the FB product just hasn't been good. It's been close to abysmal actually for far too long. I thought Diaco was going to be the guy to start changing this. While I won't go as far as others and say he sucks, and should be fired now or after this year, the evidence isn't there that he is the guy to bring fans back based on results in year 3. I hope he starts a turnaround soon.Attendance isn't low because of ticket prices.
Attendance is low because people have decided they have things they would prefer to do.
You could open up the gates for Temple and make all the seating first come/first serve and be lucky to get 22k in the stadium.
I kid you not. I can't give away tickets and a parking pass now, I never "sold" my seats but if word was out I couldn't attend a game I'd easily get half dozen offers to buy them.Season ticket holders here talk every week about their inability to give tickets away.
35,000 if tickets were free?
Nah.
But this is mainly because the FB product just hasn't been good. It's been close to abysmal actually for far too long. I thought Diaco was going to be the guy to start changing this. While I won't go as far as others and say he sucks, and should be fired now or after this year, the evidence isn't there that he is the guy to bring fans back based on results in year 3. I hope he starts a turnaround soon.
I'll say this till I'm blue in the face the perception of going from BCS to G5 relegation has been a huge blow perception wise. Administrators can spout off about supporting the team/program regardless of opponent but even on the basketball board with a nationally competitive program people complain about the conference opponents. How with a bad FB team can you expect people to show their disappointment in any way but not showing up.
I will continue to support the program by buying tickets, but my desire for showing up to watch games that have become less and less enjoyable is waning. I know it's blasphemy to complain about a game we won, but that game against UVA this year was gawd awful to watch.
Some of us are not tailgaters. I commit about 5 hours of my day saturdays to enjoying the game and supporting the team. The enjoying the game part has become very difficult.
Attendance isn't low because of ticket prices.
Attendance is low because people have decided they have things they would prefer to do.
You could open up the gates for Temple and make all the seating first come/first serve and be lucky to get 22k in the stadium.
We need to convert students who don't follow UConn football to undergrads who do follow football to alumni who continue to follow and support football. It will take about 6 consecutive or mostly consecutive years of success to do that imo.
As I said - we need non-alum fans, but they are only going to stay if the product is good. Don't for a minute think that I'm bashing non-alums - they just have a different perspective.
I know people say it's northeast thing but very few places don't feel the effects 6 consecutive losing years, which is where we are headed.I think the bulk of hardcore fans are still non-alums. The beauty of the UConn athletic program has been that the state rallied behind it during the dream season and then Geno brought along the women and whole new set of fans was created. I'd bet the true hardcore fan base is 70% non-alumni.
However, the northeastern mentality is nothing to dismiss. You have to win or it isn't worth their time. That is both obnoxious and endearing at the same time, but it is a fact. Northeasterers are never going to support mediocrity or worse due to loyalty or responsibility. They don't have that gene.
The first sentence says it all - he isn't an alum. Which makes this purely entertainment for him.
TBH I only really get irritated at the alums that walk away. As Calhoun said when he was in NYC a couple of weeks ago - the school needs us more than ever.
Bingo.
We've lost an entire generation of UConn fans because of this.
Agreed.We never had them.
They needed a home run hire after P. While I still think Diaco, has a shot to not be bust, he is definitely not a home run. Needs to win 50-50, games and he just doesn't do enough of that.Agreed.
I'm thinking of the high school to young alumni age bracket. They've known nothing but terrible UConn football. Unless UConn sustains success for years over years... this whole group is gone from the fan base, as they grow up and get married and have kids... It really sucks.
I know people say it's northeast thing but very few places don't feel the effects 6 consecutive losing years, which is where we are headed.
How about a ground rule double?They needed a home run hire after P. While I still think Diaco, has a shot to not be bust, he is definitely not a home run. Needs to win 50-50, games and he just doesn't do enough of that.
v.1) People's lives and responsibilities have evolved since the height of the Great Recession. People tightened their belts and prioritized other financial obligations over attending UConn football games.The waning fan interest is multifaceted and I think runs much beyond our recent malaise on the field.
i) cultural thing - big time college football is still a relatively new thing in the northeast.
ii) competition for free time is relentless - people have lots of options
iii) hd tv and mobile tv is not helping. stay home, condense a 5hr experience into 3hrs and multi task while you are at it
iv) uconn alumni base is not on par with other big time programs. while the school has grown rapidly, many other programs have been bigger for longer. uconn could use more influential boosters in high places.
v) central ct economy is in the middle of a weak recovery, near bottom in the nation in recovering lost jobs from the recession peak.
v.1) People's lives and responsibilities have evolved since the height of the Great Recession. People tightened their belts and prioritized other financial obligations over attending UConn football games.
Speaking from a personal POV, I bought a house in 2007, my income took a hit in 2008, and I got married in 2009, all the while moving funds around so I could maintain my football season tickets. Of Course not all fans are like me.
Finances got better, but then my first child was born in 2012 and 2nd earlier this year. Now I have more of a time issue, than financial. My first son is getting to the age where he has scheduled activities on Saturday mornings. So if I want to tailgate (and I do. It is still a lot of fun and an integral part of the game day experience), my wife is on her own with a 4 y.o. and 9 m.o. on days they don't come to the game (maybe 1 or 2 a year.) and I'm not involved in his soccer games or whatever. Soon I'll have a tough time fitting in the games let alone tailgating. Part of the reason I don't do basketball season tickets is that I can't justify all the home basketball dates vs. 5 - 6 Saturdays during the Fall.
Infield bunt single.How about a ground rule double?
It's a silly position to take. The FB program is hemorrhaging fans. Part of that is realignment related, part of it is we have been bad with little signs of improving. The good news is for those "we don't need fans like you" guys, you will have the stadium mostly to yourself soon.
I hate to admit it on here, but to support the non-alum crowd, I'll come out: I'm a Fairfield U and Boston College alum who grew up watching UCONN soccer and hoops. I'll be at Alumni Stadium wearing National Flag Blue and White, yelling at BC fans, and generally causing a commotion. There are a lot of non-alums who love to root for UCONN.As a non- alum, I disagree... Our tailgates used to be 25-50 people... 90% of whom did not attend UConn.
Now, we are lucky to have 5-10 at a tailgate.
All of these guys are big UConn fans. We all grew up in the Hartford area, but did not attend UConn for certain reasons (Financials, grades, major, wanting to go out of state, etc.)
So, I think non alum fans are very important. The UConn fans I know that went to UConn don't even care about the football program. However, the non alum fans that I know do.... but as they get older, they don't feel like finding the time, baby sitters, etc. to watch a lousy product. They will, however, watch or listen to the games.
You need to keep all fans. Non alum fans can be just as die hard as the alums, if not more in some cases. Splitting the issue up into alum vs. non alum is dumb and a waste of time. You need all fans. If you grow up in the Hartford area, you should be a fan and it is the school's obligation to keep them around.
I hate to admit it on here, but to support the non-alum crowd, I'll come out: I'm a Fairfield U and Boston College alum who grew up watching UCONN soccer and hoops. I'll be at Alumni Stadium wearing National Flag Blue and White, yelling at BC fans, and generally causing a commotion. There are a lot of non-alums who love to root for UCONN.
I think the Athletic Department knows full well that the fan base is suffering. It's quite clear from attendance. You are just one among many frustrated fans who have given up on the program.
I'm gonna keep supporting the program because that's who I am and I still enjoy tailgating and rooting for my team regardless. But I grew up bleeding UConn blue and I went there and it's just part of my DNA at this point.
Don't blame anybody for leaving. Definitely blame people for pretending we don't need the fans.
But I think the department knows full well how tough it's been on the fan base and they are certainly trying, but I am not sure what sort of miracle you expect them to perform. Fire Diaco and pray the next coach is better? Sell tickets for $10? Yell at Shirreffs until he gets better?
It's an ugly problem without any easy solutions. I hope someday we see you back.