Well that is not true. I know that because I watch, I don't know, 10 or so games a week from other conferences, and their games don't look like roller derby. By the way, other BE games don't look like that.These are the calls we’re complaining about? We HAVE to get a grip. No ref is calling any of that.
These excuses are soft and pathetic. Those are not fouls to complain about.Well that is not true. I know that because I watch, I don't know, 10 or so games a week from other conferences, and their games don't look like roller derby. By the way, other BE games don't look like that.
Yes, those are fouls and they get called all the time across college basketballThese are the calls we’re complaining about? We HAVE to get a grip. No ref is calling any of that.
You either don’t know bb or troll.These are the calls we’re complaining about? We HAVE to get a grip. No ref is calling any of that.
What Danny was asking is to call it consistently to both teams.These excuses are soft and pathetic. Those are not fouls to complain about.
If it affects the catch they should. They need to clean up off ball. Contact, and need to make sure contact on the ball carrier creates and advantage for the defense. Too much if a guy gets hit the. It is a foul. Except of course when Jayden Ross or diarra go to the basket. Then it is rule of verticality. lol.These are the calls we’re complaining about? We HAVE to get a grip. No ref is calling any of that.
lol okThese excuses are soft and pathetic. Those are not fouls to complain about.
I feel like the internet - with clips, replays, etc infinitely available - along with DVR on live TV giving us the ability to play things back in real time, is simply exposing how nearly (if not entirely) impossible it is to ref objectively. Calls are subjective, plain and simple, extremely affected by error in human judgment. However, I don’t think AI could do it justice because if AI thoroughly understood the rules and made objective calls, there would be a whistle on literally every single possession. Refereeing in all sports really is accepted in good faith alone as far as I see it.I've never coached, I haven't read the NCAA rule book. But I have watched quite a bit of MCBB, and in games where I have no preference to the outcome I have concluded anymore, that I have no idea what constitutes a foul, a charge or a block, an illegal screen etc. The refs in all leagues have become so inconsistent that it causes me to question the conspiracy theories like this.
As a UConn fan, I'm looking at the the non calls that I see all too often committed by the team we're playing against. I objectively think the refs are using two different sets of eyes at the other end of the court. I don't know if its ineptitude or dishonest effort, but it's undeniably happening.
they had no issue calling them at the end of regulation of the Xavier gameThese are the calls we’re complaining about? We HAVE to get a grip. No ref is calling any of that.
Soft and pathetic? Really? Hurley absolutely has a legitimate complaint. That was excessive. (That is all I saw of the game) The leveling of the playing field by way of allowing excessive holding and hand checking - is rather obvious.These excuses are soft and pathetic. Those are not fouls to complain about.
These are fouls plain and simple, fouling a cutter trying to use a screen to get open for a 3 pointer is just as much of a disadvantage to the offense as fouling someone taking a shot, in fact you could argue it’s even more of an advantage to the defense because often times it prevents a team from shooting entirely. What really drives me crazy is when all of that clutching and grabbing is going on and we get called for a moving screen when our guy isn’t moving. I’ll continue calling out what I see because I’m in a position to do so. The mods on this board can get upset or delete posts and threads but it doesn’t change any of the facts.These excuses are soft and pathetic. Those are not fouls to complain about.
9 times out of 10 it’s not being called. None of those clips were even as bad as the Xavier game because there was no pulling or tugging once we actually started to move.they had no issue calling them at the end of regulation of the Xavier game
Ball does the arm raise thing, but he probably needs to take a page from Stevie Mitchell and just fall over.And you know what, if we’re being held that bad teach guys how to attack those kind of things. Do rip throughs, swims, anything to get a release. In every one of those clips our guys just let themselves get touched (even though it is marginal).
Attacking those kind of things also bring attention to it to get called.
These excuses are soft and pathetic. Those are not fouls to complain about.
The more you post, the more it’s obvious how clueless you are.And you know what, if we’re being held that bad teach guys how to attack those kind of things. Do rip throughs, swims, anything to get a release. In every one of those clips our guys just let themselves get touched (even though it is marginal).
Attacking those kind of things also bring attention to it to get called.
I might be guilty of replaying and judging refs based on what I see. But if everything from simple contact and a visious mauling is subjective then that leaves every call up to the mood and bias of the ref in the moment. Yikes!I feel like the internet - with clips, replays, etc infinitely available - along with DVR on live TV giving us the ability to play things back in real time, is simply exposing how nearly (if not entirely) impossible it is to ref objectively. Calls are subjective, plain and simple, extremely affected by error in human judgment.
9 times out of 10 it’s not being called. None of those clips were even as bad as the Xavier game because there was no pulling or tugging once we actually started to move.
Most refs are not calling marginal contact away from the ball. Even in that Xavier game after they called it for McNeeley they gave them a makeup call because they knew how bad that call was in a close game like that.
These aren’t the things to fight about.