msf22b
Maestro
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 6,321
- Reaction Score
- 17,320
Looking at the +/- from the game...as posted by Nan
Morgan stood out outrageously with a +15, KK was next with +4
Is that because they mostly played mostly in the latter stages of the game
when UConn was making its big run? Or was their contribution the reason for the run?
Is it serendipitous or a true indication of talent and ability.
If one believes it is an indication of talent (and based on this one game) they would then start KK over Chen (of whom I'm very fond)
And ...for not the first time, Ice's +/- was far inferior to that of Jana.
I'm interested in what the group thinks...Is this a true indication of player value...
My guess: for one game...no, not too significant...but over several; weeks...a considerably important indicator.
Morgan stood out outrageously with a +15, KK was next with +4
Is that because they mostly played mostly in the latter stages of the game
when UConn was making its big run? Or was their contribution the reason for the run?
Is it serendipitous or a true indication of talent and ability.
If one believes it is an indication of talent (and based on this one game) they would then start KK over Chen (of whom I'm very fond)
And ...for not the first time, Ice's +/- was far inferior to that of Jana.
I'm interested in what the group thinks...Is this a true indication of player value...
My guess: for one game...no, not too significant...but over several; weeks...a considerably important indicator.