Hold on to your hats - Charlie speaks | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Hold on to your hats - Charlie speaks

So Charlie is putting us in the bracket where we have played the other 3 top teams.
Doesn't the Committee also take this into consideration?
You would think, however with all the items they need to consider, along with avoiding intra-conference matchups before the E8, who knows.
 
Give us the 2-seed with our 1-seed Va Tech. Put us in a bracket that avoids both SC and Stanford in the semis. That would be fair with me and what this team deserves based on it's accomplishments and current lineup.
 
No update to top 16 after all conference tourney games complete. My eyes will be on where the committee places Texas, Duke, ND. It will be interesting to compare CC's last prediction with the committee's picks.
 
Also, here are CC's predictions by conference:

ACC - 8
Pac-12 - 7
Big Ten - 7
SEC - 7
Big 12 - 6
Big East - 5
AAC - 2
WCC - 2
 
No update to top 16 after all conference tourney games complete. My eyes will be on where the committee places Texas, Duke, ND. It will be interesting to compare CC's last prediction with the committee's picks.

They better not put Duke as the #3 with Connecticut as the #2.
 
.-.
They better not put Duke as the #3 with Connecticut as the #2.
Unless the committee veers sharply away from CC's methodology, they are there right now, along with Iowa and Texas, whom UConn has already beaten, however the NCAAT is a different beast altogether.
 
Unless the committee veers sharply away from CC's methodology, they are there right now, along with Iowa and Texas, whom UConn has already beaten, however the NCAAT is a different beast altogether.
CC’s methodology is about clicks and outrage not anything the committee is looking to replicate.
 
I hate that Creme has UCONN as a 2 seed in the SAME bracket as Iowa Duke and Texas—teams they have already played this season.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,220
Messages
4,557,744
Members
10,442
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom