Hold on to your hats - Charlie speaks | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Hold on to your hats - Charlie speaks

Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
3,825
Reaction Score
15,629
While as a UConn fan I have always been heavily invested in the Huskies seeding, through the years I could understand most decisions. Having Virginia Tech in the top 8, much less the top 4, makes no sense. All the metrics that are supposed to count, strength of schedule, Top 10 wins, etc. are not in their favor.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
7,518
Reaction Score
24,550
I don't understand how Stanford can remain a 1 seed. I think they have the same body of work as Uconn.
Yeah. When I heard that Stanford could be a #1 seed, I was left confused. I think that Stanford is a great team and usually they are worthy of that #1 spot. This year, they have been hot/cold. I just can't see them being a #1 seed.
 

Phil

Stats Geek
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
4,451
Reaction Score
5,801
He has Princeton having to "play their way back in." That's only because he has picked Columbia to win the Ivy League Tournament this weekend. He does that despite 1) Princeton and Columbia sharing the Ivy League regular season championship, 2) Princeton playing better than Columbia at the end of the season and 3) the Ivy tournament on Princeton's home court.

Just more reason to root for Princeton.


And Princeton is listed as the #1 seed, which means they won the tiebreaker.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
763
Reaction Score
3,922
Massey ratings has moved UConn to #2 in ranking-10th in offense 4th in defense
 

UConnCat

Wise Woman
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
13,920
Reaction Score
87,208

BRS24

LisaG
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
4,148
Reaction Score
24,967
No change to top 16. Here are the comments from CC:

"Wednesday was much calmer in Bracketology. No bids were stolen as UNLV completed its perfect Mountain West season with a conference tournament title. The No. 11 and 12 seeds are crowded with teams that could be on either seed line. Given how similar the profiles are, and for geographical balance and more beneficial travel, the Lady Rebels remain a No. 12 seed. Sacramento State (No. 13) claimed the Big Sky crown, and the Hornets warranted a better seed than Northern Arizona would have been (No. 15), so that shuffled the seeding of some other teams. The top 16 remained unchanged."

 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,867
Reaction Score
15,204
Agree that some of the brackets that have UConn as a #3 seed look pretty favorable. In any case, since Charlie is just a writer and does not pick the teams or seeds, what he says has about as much influence and you and I have.
With all due respect, it’s difficult to see how a nationally known writer whose entire career is built around his “bracketology” schtick can be said to have no influence on tournament selections. It is basically inconceivable that many of the selectors do not look at Crème’s brackets and accompanying articles. As for him having the same influence as “you and I” , I’m afraid that dog just won’t hunt. I wish it did though, as I find him to be extremely biased and full of himself.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2021
Messages
213
Reaction Score
1,859
I'd be curious if anyone has ever seen Charlie delineate his strategy? Is it: 1) I'm all-knowing and all-powerful, and this is what the brackets need to look like, or 2) I'm doing my best to predict what the committee will do?
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,867
Reaction Score
15,204
UConn aside, I need an LSU & Maryland matchup bad. Not only Reese’s former team wanting to beat her new team, but Kim vs. Brenda would be interesting to say the least.
LSU by 10+
 

UConnCat

Wise Woman
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
13,920
Reaction Score
87,208
I'd be curious if anyone has ever seen Charlie delineate his strategy? Is it: 1) I'm all-knowing and all-powerful, and this is what the brackets need to look like, or 2) I'm doing my best to predict what the committee will do?
He and others at ESPN say 2) is his goal but we know from tweets ("I was right all along and ___ should not be top 16") suggests he lets 1) affect his work. He's human with an ego so understandable. All and all he and ESPN get what they want: fans paying attention. He'll still have a lot to say after the Committee reveals its brackets and the games begin but what he says then will be much less relevant or newsworthy.

After the tournament he'll reveal his preseason top 25 and the cycle will begin again.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,867
Reaction Score
15,204
And deep
While SC is clearly the (heavy) favorite, they have nevertheless shown that they are not an unbeatable juggernaut. They’ve had two overtime games, and a four point game against a seriously compromised UConn team that was missing their best player and another starter/top bench player. They should win but it’s clearly not a certainty. One bad offensive game coupled with a hot shooting opponent and it’s bye bye SC! Not likely perhaps but, “Hope springs eternal”.:rolleyes: That reminds me of another (perhaps appropriate) saying, “whistling past the graveyard”:D
Not singling out SC in particular, I’d just as soon Stanford, Indiana, Iowa, LSU, etc are gone if we make the final four too. I know it’s shameful and cowardly but….there it is! I promise I’ll be braver next year!
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,503
Reaction Score
38,701
I didn't notice this one when it first came out. Creme with another artful piece attempting to minimize UConn's historic achievements. In this one, He's forecasting an SC NC, which isn't unlikely, and the comparing it to other undefeated NCs. The problem is how to do that without noticing UConn's towering achievements in precisely this area.

It must have killed him to post a table to past undefeated seasons that clearly shows SC to trail UConn in several statistical categories. In the end, he resorts to noting that UConn wasn't ranked #1 for the entirety of everyone of those seasons. Gee, I wonder why that was?
 

BRS24

LisaG
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
4,148
Reaction Score
24,967
I didn't notice this one when it first came out. Creme with another artful piece attempting to minimize UConn's historic achievements. In this one, He's forecasting an SC NC, which isn't unlikely, and the comparing it to other undefeated NCs. The problem is how to do that without noticing UConn's towering achievements in precisely this area.

It must have killed him to post a table to past undefeated seasons that clearly shows SC to trail UConn in several statistical categories. In the end, he resorts to noting that UConn wasn't ranked #1 for the entirety of everyone of those seasons. Gee, I wonder why that was?
I read this article and thought, huh, is it my UConn-bias, or did he cite a bunch of stuff re TN without going into detail about UConn's undefeated+natty years?
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
1,137
Reaction Score
4,381
I read this article and thought, huh, is it my UConn-bias, or did he cite a bunch of stuff re TN without going into detail about UConn's undefeated+natty years?
Agree with both of your comments. My guess is that ESPN writers feel that people are tired of UConn and/or hate UConn, so best to downplay them. That is, unless we have Stewie and can’t be ignored.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
3,825
Reaction Score
15,629
With all due respect, it’s difficult to see how a nationally known writer whose entire career is built around his “bracketology” schtick can be said to have no influence on tournament selections. It is basically inconceivable that many of the selectors do not look at Crème’s brackets and accompanying articles. As for him having the same influence as “you and I” , I’m afraid that dog just won’t hunt. I wish it did though, as I find him to be extremely biased and full of himself.
If you have followed Creme's picks and through the years have the committees have followed his assessments, you realize there is little influence. Charlie is more click bait than factual analysis.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
735
Reaction Score
3,023
If you have followed Creme's picks and through the years have the committees have followed his assessments, you realize there is little influence. Charlie is more click bait than factual analysis.
I was just going to ask if the actual brackets matched Creme's. I'm glad they don't.

Keeping LSU as a top team is just a continuation of all the years Tenn was picked way past their prime and were eliminated early in the post season- only to be rated highly again the following year.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,969
Reaction Score
33,446
If you have followed Creme's picks and through the years have the committees have followed his assessments, you realize there is little influence. Charlie is more click bait than factual analysis.
Conveniently ignores every UConn team has a higher mov, while searching for SC dominance.
 

toadfoot

To live will be an awfully big adventure.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
795
Reaction Score
2,156
I would take this bracket but it’s also not consistent with how the committee has seeded teams in the previous two reveals. People are overestimating the last ten games with the committee has consistently rewarded team for their full resume.
As I said on another thread a UConn versus Indiana debate should give the #1 to UConn. In almost any metric you want to name UConn ranks better than Indiana. NET ranking, wins against top 25 NET, common opponents, SOS and regular season and conference tournament champions while Indiana lost in tournament semifinals. The only edge Indiana could claim would be last 10 but given the injury situation, which the committee is supposed to consider I can’t see how Indiana rates a #1 in the same bracket as UConn.
 

Online statistics

Members online
396
Guests online
1,878
Total visitors
2,274

Forum statistics

Threads
159,552
Messages
4,195,478
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom