Hassan Diarra | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Hassan Diarra

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
1,505
Reaction Score
5,696
No Boneyard thing to my knowledge.

I did a brief search after your reply, @Chuck, and this is what I found:

View attachment 76296
Yeah, just a peeve of mine (and riff on our 20 minute thing). I deal with people all over the country and daylight savings can be annoying. People often think EST just means Eastern Time. I usually just use ET and let the other party figure that out. It's Arizona that is always the hardest (It's currently MST, which is the same as PDT).

Looking forward to 1:15, 2:15 or whatever 20 minute increment the tweet comes in from Diarra.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,576
Reaction Score
83,952
This would be an excellent get. I was thinking it would be tough to recruit a supporting player from a P5 level program, they would need to get someone going up in class, like a Kromah. Instead, we have a player with big game, big crowd experience.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
3,344
Reaction Score
20,230
I haven’t seen Hassan play in college but in high school he seemed like a warrior, hard-nosed, big balls type of player. I’ll take that especially if he shoots well from 3 towards which he apparently did the last dozen games or so in Texas.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
1,844
Reaction Score
3,027
Good thing I'm not taking a course on this.

Otherwise, I'd be on the other thread about what we don't do well or as well as we should.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
2,477
Reaction Score
17,786
He was in Texas finishing up his semester. When NYC is home, no need to fly across the country for a visit before school is done. I like him as a player, but he also understands what he can get out of the game beyond that. His brother has thrived at UConn (two degrees and a job), even when he couldn’t play anymore.
The handling of the whole MD situation was the proudest As a fan I’ve been during the Hurley Era & when I realized we had the right guy
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
1,557
Reaction Score
7,879
Yeah, I really don't understand the "it's hard to get excited about a backup" when a lot of the same people lamented "wish we had a quality backup to spell Cole for a few minutes" last year.
I think he’s a great fit. I do wonder what will happen with Castle, though. In my opinion, there are still minutes available if he were to reclassify. If that’s the case I think our staff deserves a ton of credit for their offseason efforts. Newton, Alleyne, Diarra, & Castle would all be fantastic additions.

However, let’s say Castle does not reclass. While the off-season was still successful, part of me thinks the staff could’ve landed a truly elite transfer for the scholarship that was given to Alleyne. I don’t mean that as a knock on Alleyne, but given our roster construction, we had the ability to recruit practically any guard on the market & offer a starting role (I.e. Terrence Shannon, Antonio Reeves, Scheierman).
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,098
Reaction Score
82,628
I think he’s a great fit. I do wonder what will happen with Castle, though. In my opinion, there are still minutes available if he were to reclassify. If that’s the case I think our staff deserves a ton of credit for their offseason efforts. Newton, Alleyne, Diarra, & Castle would all be fantastic additions.

However, let’s say Castle does not reclass. While the off-season was still successful, part of me thinks the staff could’ve landed a truly elite transfer for the scholarship that was given to Alleyne. I don’t mean that as a knock on Alleyne, but given our roster construction, we had the ability to recruit practically any guard on the market & offer a starting role (I.e. Terrence Shannon, Antonio Reeves, Scheierman).
Did we? I keep seeing that view, but honestly Andre Jackson is a guard. Hawkins is a guard. Newton is a guard. There is certainly time available for Alleyne, and even somebody else. But It's probably not 30+ minutes. We nailed the guy we needed to get with Newton. After that Alleyne is a good fit as a flexible guard with some size. Johnson and Karaban are going to play. Four out doesn't mean 4 guards. Ideally it still only means two.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,404
Reaction Score
89,767
I think he’s a great fit. I do wonder what will happen with Castle, though. In my opinion, there are still minutes available if he were to reclassify. If that’s the case I think our staff deserves a ton of credit for their offseason efforts. Newton, Alleyne, Diarra, & Castle would all be fantastic additions.

However, let’s say Castle does not reclass. While the off-season was still successful, part of me thinks the staff could’ve landed a truly elite transfer for the scholarship that was given to Alleyne. I don’t mean that as a knock on Alleyne, but given our roster construction, we had the ability to recruit practically any guard on the market & offer a starting role (I.e. Terrence Shannon, Antonio Reeves, Scheierman).
I'm not sure if this is really the case. We know the staff was still pursuing Jahmir Young because it was announced he had a visit set up, but he canceled it once Newton committed. Any elite player is going to command 30+ minutes and that was not available at that point
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,246
Reaction Score
21,324
While the off-season was still successful, part of me thinks the staff could’ve landed a truly elite transfer for the scholarship that was given to Alleyne. I don’t mean that as a knock on Alleyne, but given our roster construction, we had the ability to recruit practically any guard on the market & offer a starting role (I.e. Terrence Shannon, Antonio Reeves, Scheierman).
we were still recruiting shannon and ramey and young etc after newton committed so it wasnt for lack of trying. you can criticize the result if you must but not the intent.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
1,188
Reaction Score
6,833
we were still recruiting shannon and ramey and young etc after newton committed so it wasnt for lack of trying. you can criticize the results if you must but not the intent.
We never had a chance with Shannon and Young was done as soon as Newton committed. I agree with @lange10 that the Alleyne spot was probably the last desirable one the staff had to offer and they filled it rather quickly to a meh player.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,487
Reaction Score
66,555
However, let’s say Castle does not reclass. While the off-season was still successful, part of me thinks the staff could’ve landed a truly elite transfer for the scholarship that was given to Alleyne. I don’t mean that as a knock on Alleyne, but given our roster construction, we had the ability to recruit practically any guard on the market & offer a starting role (I.e. Terrence Shannon, Antonio Reeves, Scheierman).
I think part of it is that for the 2nd transfer slot (after Newton), we were looking for (mostly) off-ball players. Not necessarily players that can't create, but that don't have a game that relies on dominating the ball. And also the top combos/2s want situations where the ball is in their hands all the time or all the shots. That's why they're the "top" players, in a way. They have the most production and impact. We could no longer offer that and weren't necessarily looking for that.

But we're building a team. We wanted defense, shooting, and a certain role. If you narrow down on that role, Alleyne is a top 20 guy in that role in the market (top 5 or so of those still available now). We were looking at Richard and Ramey also in the same role.

The Castle connection both helped to land him and will help to keep Castle in the fold. 2 birds in the hand beats none in the bush, if you will.

And on top of all that a lot of them wanted a hefty NIL bag, which I have no idea how competitive we've been. Reeves went to Kentucky. Scheierman got a major bag and had a somewhat local connection. Shannon went to Michigan. Big bags $.
 
Last edited:

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,098
Reaction Score
82,628
I think part of it is that for the 2nd transfer slot (after Newton), we were looking for (mostly) off-ball players. Not necessarily players that can't create, but that don't have a game that relies on dominating the ball. And also the top combos/2s want situations where the ball is in their hands all the time or all the shots. That's why they're the "top" players, in a way. They have the most production and impact. We could no longer offer that and weren't necessarily looking for that.

But we're building a team. We wanted defense, shooting, and a certain role. If you narrow down on that role, Alleyne is a top 20 guy in that role in the market (top 5 or so of those still available now). We were looking at Richard and Ramey also in the same role.

The Castle connection both helped to land him and will help to keep Castle in the fold. 2 birds in the hand beats none in the bush, if you will.

And on top of all that a lot of them wanted a hefty NIL bag, which I have no idea how competitive we've been. Reeves went to Kentucky. Scheierman got a major bag and had a somewhat local connection. Shannon went to Michigan. Big bags $.
Very well said. I think defense, toughness, rebounding and decent shooting are the requirements for the role. It's similar to the Martin role and he was a good get (if probably not as good as Martin). I find myself perplexed that somehow people think we need to play 4 guys who are all ball dominant and can beat their man, create and score. With Newton and Jackson on the floor at the same time, we already have maxed out on ball dominant players. One of the reasons Newton is such a good fit is that he can slide off the ball and be a solid SG. The other guys need to convert what those two and the overall motion offense creates. I think Alleyne will have more open shots at UConn than he had at VT.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,246
Reaction Score
21,324
We never had a chance with Shannon and Young was done as soon as Newton committed. I agree with @lange10 that the Alleyne spot was probably the last desirable one the staff had to offer and they filled it rather quickly to a meh player.
if alleyne is meh yet we didnt have a chance with guys like shannon and young once newton committed then who was the magical fit? as auror just posted, there were only a couple better options for an off-ball G. staff made the smart play taking alleyne versus waiting and hoping on a guy like ramey.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
1,188
Reaction Score
6,833
if alleyne is meh yet we didnt have a chance with guys like shannon and young once newton committed then who was the magical fit? as auror just posted, there were only a couple better options for an off-ball G.
Shannon was always going to the Big Ten and I don't know what happened with Young. I don't understand why we should be so set on an off-ball G though. Our problem last year was we didn't have enough ball handling and shot creating and that still hasn't really been fixed yet.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
1,557
Reaction Score
7,879
I think part of it is that for the 2nd transfer slot (after Newton), we were looking for (mostly) off-ball players. Not necessarily players that can't create, but that don't have a game that relies on dominating the ball. And also the top combos/2s want situations where the ball is in their hands all the time or all the shots. That's why they're the "top" players, in a way. They have the most production and impact. We could no longer offer that and weren't necessarily looking for that.

But we're building a team. We wanted defense, shooting, and a certain role. If you narrow down on that role, Alleyne is a top 20 guy in that role in the market (top 5 or so of those still available now). We were looking at Richard and Ramey also in the same role.

The Castle connection both helped to land him and will help to keep Castle in the fold. 2 birds in the hand beats none in the bush, if you will.

And on top of all that a lot of them wanted a hefty NIL bag, which I have no idea how competitive we've been. Reeves went to Kentucky. Scheierman got a major bag and had a somewhat local connection. Shannon went to Michigan. Big bags $.
Fair rebuttal. Appreciate the insight. I knew the names I mentioned were all potentially unavailable due to NIL demands, but I think you understood my point either way.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
1,557
Reaction Score
7,879
Did we? I keep seeing that view, but honestly Andre Jackson is a guard. Hawkins is a guard. Newton is a guard. There is certainly time available for Alleyne, and even somebody else. But It's probably not 30+ minutes. We nailed the guy we needed to get with Newton. After that Alleyne is a good fit as a flexible guard with some size. Johnson and Karaban are going to play. Four out doesn't mean 4 guards. Ideally it still only means two.
I’d hope Johnson & Karaban are getting lots of burn for us at the 4. I’m not saying four out has to mean four guards, but considering how unique Jackson is as a player, we’re not giving up much on the defensive end (if at all given his toughness & rebounding abilities) by giving him minutes at the 4.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,246
Reaction Score
21,324
I don't know what happened with Young...Our problem last year was we didn't have enough ball handling and shot creating and that still hasn't really been fixed yet.
but you just said Young was done as soon as Newton committed, and that was probably the case for any ball dominant transfer G

i also think the problems have been addressed. let's say we play a small ball starting lineup. we have two dominant ball handlers in newton and aj surrounded by two shooters in alleyene and hawk. plus sanogo. that gives us more ball handling/passing and a lot more shooting in the starting lineup than we had last year.

off the bench we could have diarra who is a better ball handler/passer than gaff. plus karaban and samson who should give us as much shooting as polley and akok.
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
1,188
Reaction Score
6,833
but you just said Young was done as soon as Newton committed, and that was probably the case for any ball dominant transfer G

i also think the problems have been fixed. let's say we play a small ball starting lineup. we have two dominant ball handlers in newton and aj surrounded by two shooters in alleyene and hawk. plus sanogo. that gives us more ball handling and a lot more shooting in the starting lineup than we had last year.

off the bench we could have diarra who is a better ball handler than gaff. plus karaban and samson who should give us as much shooting as polley and akok.
I agree we will be a better team if the returning guys make the expected jumps and Newton's game translates over, but I still think we are another shot creator away from being really good.
 

RichZ

Fort the ead!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,249
Reaction Score
22,302
Does anyone get excited over backups? We’re not adding a future superstar here.
Can't win without competent backups. In today's NCAA world, guys who are potential stars don't come in to play backup for two seasons. And those that bloom late, unless they're so obviously talented that they replace the star that they're backing up, are going into the portal. You need a serviceable PG backup. Someone to give you're starting PG a breather without digging you a hole. Diarra seems to fit that role. Excited? No. Satisfied? Thinking yes, if and when.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
4,598
Reaction Score
20,219
Don't get this tampering stuff re: HD.. UConn had mild interest in him before he made his first college choice two years ago. No mention of him by the staff since then until he made himself available in the portal. DH/staff are continuing to fill out their roster needs for the next few years and he may be a potential fit as could other players they're looking at.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,098
Reaction Score
82,628
For anybody talking about tampering. UConn is more likely a victim than a perpetrator so

let it go GIF
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
305
Guests online
2,593
Total visitors
2,898

Forum statistics

Threads
157,270
Messages
4,090,611
Members
9,983
Latest member
Darkbloom


Top Bottom