Hartford Courant on Diarra | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Hartford Courant on Diarra

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,957
Reaction Score
74,110
At the risk of getting my head bitten off, why are there no high end programs in on this kid?
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,957
Reaction Score
74,110
Okay, well done. But you're a recruiting guy. What's the answer? I'm not saying he's not a good player, I'm saying I know squadoosh about him but when I google him I see a bunch of mid-majors.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,957
Reaction Score
5,401
At the risk of getting my head bitten off, why are there no high end programs in on this kid?

He's raw and a late bloomer - not all that different from Steve Enoch. Time will tell if he shoots up the rankings as drastically as Enoch did.

Bottom line is if the staff is willing to take him this early, we should feel pretty good about him.

Also not insignificant - his buddy Diallo in the class of 2017 is supposed to be the real deal.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,761
Reaction Score
143,889
Okay, well done. But you're a recruiting guy. What's the answer? I'm not saying he's not a good player, I'm saying I know squadoosh about him but when I google him I see a bunch of mid-majors.
I think what HuskyBballFan says is the most accurate - Diarra is a late bloomer. Also, I'm not sure how much he played on the summer AAU circuit last year, either, which could contribute to not many knowing about him.

As for offers, among the mid-majors, I found reported offers from Temple, Providence, Seton Hall, Minnesota, and St. John's too. He seems like the kind of player who is going to blow up over the summer, similar to how Enoch did.

Edit: Looks like he only joined Putnam Science Academy in January of 2014 and was relatively unknown prior to that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,028
Reaction Score
3,724
He's raw and a late bloomer - not all that different from Steve Enoch. Time will tell if he shoots up the rankings as drastically as Enoch did.

Bottom line is if the staff is willing to take him this early, we should feel pretty good about him.

Also not insignificant - his buddy Diallo in the class of 2017 is supposed to be the real deal.

Exactly, I get the sense that UConn could get him almost whenever they want, so taking him in May is a good sign.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,330
Reaction Score
2,906
I think what HuskyBballFan says is the most accurate - Diarra is a late bloomer. Also, I'm not sure how much he played on the summer AAU circuit last year, either, which could contribute to not many knowing about him.

As for offers, among the mid-majors, I found reported offers from Temple, Providence, Seton Hall, Minnesota, and St. John's too. He seems like the kind of player who is going to blow up over the summer, similar to how Enoch did.

Edit: Looks like he only joined Putnam Science Academy in January of 2014 and was relatively unknown prior to that.

Not that I don't want this kid, or don't think he looks promising.

But when was the last big man that we landed that didn't fit this description?

Is it asking too much that we recruit a big man who can come in and contribute right away? And it doesn't have to be a top 5 guy like Stone where the odds are against us.

Enoch, Facey, Brimah, Nolan..Lubin (sort of). All of them raw, late blooming, upside type guys. Heck even Andre. I guess Oriakhi was the last one and even he was more of an athlete and didn't have much (if any) low post game to speak of.

Its great to get guys like that, but it would be huge if we could mix in a proven skilled low-post performer as well to give these guys a year or two to develop.

Edit: without looking it up, therefore the opportunity for oversight and looking stupid, but I guess the last proven big man we got was Jeff Adrien, and that was 10 years ago now. That's crazy
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
10,261
Reaction Score
33,209
Not that I don't want this kid, or don't think he looks promising.

But when was the last big man that we landed that didn't fit this description?

Is it asking too much that we recruit a big man who can come in and contribute right away? And it doesn't have to be a top 5 guy like Stone where the odds are against us.

Enoch, Facey, Brimah, Nolan..Lubin (sort of). All of them raw, late blooming, upside type guys. Heck even Andre. I guess Oriakhi was the last one and even he was more of an athlete and didn't have much (if any) low post game to speak of.

Its great to get guys like that, but it would be huge if we could mix in a proven skilled low-post performer as well to give these guys a year or two to develop.

Edit: without looking it up, therefore the opportunity for oversight and looking stupid, but I guess the last proven big man we got was Jeff Adrien, and that was 10 years ago now. That's crazy

there's only so many big men out there that have low post games and/or are skilled(shooting, dribbling), hell, you had people last year arguing that Cliff Alexander had either closed the gap on Okafor or even passed him a prospect and dude went to Kansas and didn't really do much. Maybe I'm in the minority, but when it comes to bigs I don't really have a problem with the staff recruiting raw players who are expected to get better over time and with upside, my only thing is I just hope they come in physically ready to compete in college and not on the thin side like Facey and Brimah so it doesn't take them 2 years to get their bodies together. From looking at video Diarra looks to be well put together in addition to being a good athlete + long limbed(the anti Lubin) so i don't really have a problem with the staff zeroing in on him. Guards and wings are where I expect guys to be ready to contribute on both ends of the floor, it would be nice to be able to have both and not be so reliant on the development side when it comes to bigs, but other than UK and a handful of others there really aren't too many teams getting big men with ready made games.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,023
Reaction Score
175,319
there's only so many big men out there that have low post games and/or are skilled(shooting, dribbling), hell, you had people last year arguing that Cliff Alexander had either closed the gap on Okafor or even passed him a prospect and dude went to Kansas and didn't really do much. Maybe I'm in the minority, but when it comes to bigs I don't really have a problem with the staff recruiting raw players who are expected to get better over time and with upside, my only thing is I just hope they come in physically ready to compete in college and not on the thin side like Facey and Brimah so it doesn't take them 2 years to get their bodies together. From looking at video Diarra looks to be well put together in addition to being a good athlete + long limbed(the anti Lubin) so i don't really have a problem with the staff zeroing in on him. Guards and wings are where I expect guys to be ready to contribute on both ends of the floor, it would be nice to be able to have both and not be so reliant on the development side when it comes to bigs, but other than UK and a handful of others there really aren't too many teams getting big men with ready made games.
I was one of those fools who thought Cliff Alexander had caught up or even passed Okafor off of my time watching them play in high school, boy was I wrong. What's not to like about Diarra? Guy is a beast on the glass, dunks everything, has a good frame to pack on muscle and has long arms. Somebody said he looked like Montrezl and I can see the resemblance in their style and look.
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
21,999
Reaction Score
41,479
I think what HuskyBballFan says is the most accurate - Diarra is a late bloomer. Also, I'm not sure how much he played on the summer AAU circuit last year, either, which could contribute to not many knowing about him.

As for offers, among the mid-majors, I found reported offers from Temple, Providence, Seton Hall, Minnesota, and St. John's too. He seems like the kind of player who is going to blow up over the summer, similar to how Enoch did.

Edit: Looks like he only joined Putnam Science Academy in January of 2014 and was relatively unknown prior to that.

Also, the former PSA was not very highly touted among NEPSAC schools. Scoochie Smith of Dayton is the only player to come out of there in the past 6-7 years to go to even a top mid major, no P5 guys. Perusing NERR's profile on them, they've had only 5 other D1 guys in that time frame, and they've gone on to play for Quinnipiac, Maine, Rider, Charleston Southern, and Norfolk State. So I don't think that many coaches see them as a hotbed of talent, and therefore they don't spend as much time there. If he played for even a Class AA or A school he'd have a lot more eyes on him.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,957
Reaction Score
5,401
Not that I don't want this kid, or don't think he looks promising.

But when was the last big man that we landed that didn't fit this description?

Is it asking too much that we recruit a big man who can come in and contribute right away? And it doesn't have to be a top 5 guy like Stone where the odds are against us.

Enoch, Facey, Brimah, Nolan..Lubin (sort of). All of them raw, late blooming, upside type guys. Heck even Andre. I guess Oriakhi was the last one and even he was more of an athlete and didn't have much (if any) low post game to speak of.

Its great to get guys like that, but it would be huge if we could mix in a proven skilled low-post performer as well to give these guys a year or two to develop.

Edit: without looking it up, therefore the opportunity for oversight and looking stupid, but I guess the last proven big man we got was Jeff Adrien, and that was 10 years ago now. That's crazy

If Drummond and Oriakhi don't meet your definition of bigs who came in and contributed right away, I don't know who will - unless you think guys like Okafor and Towns grow on trees.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
5,290
Reaction Score
19,770
Not that I don't want this kid, or don't think he looks promising.

But when was the last big man that we landed that didn't fit this description?

Is it asking too much that we recruit a big man who can come in and contribute right away?

Shonn Miller
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,330
Reaction Score
2,906
If Drummond and Oriakhi don't meet your definition of bigs who came in and contributed right away, I don't know who will - unless you think guys like Okafor and Towns grow on trees.

I meant can come in and we can give it to them in the post and they can actually score. Neither of those 2 had any low post moves when they got here. Not saying we need to get D Stone, but just a guy who can actually keep a defense honest down low
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,761
Reaction Score
143,889
I meant can come in and we can give it to them in the post and they can actually score. Neither of those 2 had any low post moves when they got here. Not saying we need to get D Stone, but just a guy who can actually keep a defense honest down low
Probably Charlie Villanueva then.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,028
Reaction Score
3,724
I meant can come in and we can give it to them in the post and they can actually score. Neither of those 2 had any low post moves when they got here. Not saying we need to get D Stone, but just a guy who can actually keep a defense honest down low

You're not going to find very many guys like that outside of the top 15.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,660
Reaction Score
32,863
If he couldn't take KO imagine if he ever played for JC? Need to be thick skinned and man up in any big time program. I am sure KO is capable of breaking down any individual player at any given time as well he should be.
Funny but I thought him playing for Bob Knight when I read your post.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,781
Reaction Score
98,010
He seems like he's a major project.

I don't see "major" project at all. Let's remember he has another year to prep and his skill set to rebound the ball and block shots is almost there. That's pretty much where Amida is/was and he played a lot and had an impact. A lot depends on how much he wants to improve and how much he understands the game. Good body, length - I think he could be a real good one.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,058
Reaction Score
219,931
Because of the insufferable amount of diarrhea jokes that come with his recruitment.
Well that was a crappy thing to say.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,227
Reaction Score
12,720
He seems like he's a major project.
If you watch the tapes I see an athletic player who is very active and he isn't a beanpole like most of our current players. It would be nice to get a guy with an actual physique that can play down low. Nothing against Facey and Brimah but they definitely don't have top division 1 physiques like this guy.

The staff seems to be at least going for big guys that have the body to play down low in SE and MD after seeing how living on beanpoles isn't really working for us. I mean basically Diarra is rated a little bit higher than AB so that is fine in my book.

I mean I would prefer an Andre Drummond or Charlie Villanueva but it doesn't seem like we are having much luck landing top big men anymore.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,179
Reaction Score
2,510
If you watch the tapes I see an athletic player who is very active and he isn't a beanpole like most of our current players. It would be nice to get a guy with an actual physique that can play down low. Nothing against Facey and Brimah but they definitely don't have top division 1 physiques like this guy.

The staff seems to be at least going for big guys that have the body to play down low in SE and MD after seeing how living on beanpoles isn't really working for us. I mean basically Diarra is rated a little bit higher than AB so that is fine in my book.

I mean I would prefer an Andre Drummond or Charlie Villanueva but it doesn't seem like we are having much luck landing top big men anymore.
I got you and I just watched a tape. I honestly cant remember any of our big men other then the 2 you named every being ranked top 100 coming out of high school anyway. All were project turnarounds. Im with it I suppose
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,028
Reaction Score
3,724
I got you and I just watched a tape. I honestly cant remember any of our big men other then the 2 you named every being ranked top 100 coming out of high school anyway. All were project turnarounds. Im with it I suppose

Adrien, Thabeet, Majok, and Facey were all top 100 kids, and the first three were top 50 kids.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,135
Reaction Score
20,042
Adrien, Thabeet, Majok, and Facey were all top 100 kids, and the first three were top 50 kids.

And Oriakhi was top 20. And Sticks and Roscoe were both top 30 (even though RS especially thought he was a 3).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
1,509
Total visitors
1,584

Forum statistics

Threads
159,075
Messages
4,179,447
Members
10,049
Latest member
MTSuitsky


.
Top Bottom