Harsh Yahoo stuff on Andre | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Harsh Yahoo stuff on Andre

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
1,582
Reaction Score
1,846
One thing I don't understand - if Drummond is projected to be great 5-6 years down the road, why would a team draft him now? Don't you just wait until he becomes a free agent and let another team do the dirty work.
 

nomar

#1 Casual Fan™
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,164
Reaction Score
45,935
One thing I don't understand - if Drummond is projected to be great 5-6 years down the road, why would a team draft him now? Don't you just wait until he becomes a free agent and let another team do the dirty work.

He becomes a restricted free agent before he becomes an unrestricted free agent. So if he shows some promise in the first couple years, you can lock him up for a while.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,986
Reaction Score
99,157
l guess I need a little help with your point on Hibbert vs Drummond? My question to you is what was Roy rated going into Gtown vs Andre who was 1 or 2 out of HS? Add to that he stayed 4 years and turned himself into a nice player...imagine what Andre may have been if he stayed a couple more.....maybe?
 

uconnbill

A Half full kind of guy
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,599
Reaction Score
15,493
Someone please save all the homer posts in the archives and resurrect it when Anthony Davis is a perennial all star and Andre is a bench big guy 5 years from now. Another case of homerism empowering the Internet poster to think they are smarter than those that are paid to evaluate. There is a sharp, again sharp contrast between Anthony Davis and Andre Drummond. The Kwame comparison isn't worth anyones time to even dissect.

P.S. Have you seen some of the big men in the NBA lately?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
321
Reaction Score
193
One thing I don't understand - if Drummond is projected to be great 5-6 years down the road, why would a team draft him now? Don't you just wait until he becomes a free agent and let another team do the dirty work.

because you get the opportunity to see if he shows strides and try to lock him up to a discounted longer term deal before he becomes a free agent.

if you wait til he becomes a free agent and he's shown promise, with his upside we're talking about a Bynum type contract he'll be demanding (14-18 mil)


if Drummond is a legit 7 ft 275 lb guy (like they said he was), guys with that size and athleticism don't come around more than once a decade. you pay coaches and trainers to mold guys like that, its not like he is completely clueless. for comparison, Dwight Howard is 6'9 but listed at 6'11.
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,233
Reaction Score
25,285
Right now, he's Nuke LaLouche. All the talent in the world with no idea on how to use it.

His FT% and lack of rebounding last year is hurting him even more than the lack of polished skills. I wouldn't take him unless I could afford to gamble with the pick.

Good for Andre is that his talent and potential overwhelm that of any other pick in the 7-10 range, except maybe Sullinger.

Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
653
Reaction Score
266
In three years there will be a debate on this board. Drummond is a bust...no he isn't...yes he is...yada, yada, yada. Same with Lamb.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
34,065
Reaction Score
91,181
It's all up to Andre. He has all the tools he needs now. He can run the floor, pass, rebound, defend. His main problem is that he's truly just a kid. If can just worry about basketball and forget about the rest for a few years he'll be fine. Hopefully Mom will be a help not a hindrance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
46
Guests online
1,490
Total visitors
1,536

Forum statistics

Threads
160,793
Messages
4,238,722
Members
10,093
Latest member
Verna


.
Top Bottom