Someone please save all the homer posts in the archives and resurrect it when Anthony Davis is a perennial all star and Andre is a bench big guy 5 years from now. Another case of homerism empowering the Internet poster to think they are smarter than those that are paid to evaluate. There is a sharp, again sharp contrast between Anthony Davis and Andre Drummond. The Kwame comparison isn't worth anyones time to even dissect.
Drummond's too athletic and big not to be starting 5 years from now. He'll need to develop, and probably would have been better served long term with another year or two of college, but he played on a completely dysfunctional team last year.
Besides, it's not like the guys that get paid don't make mistakes... Darko Milicic was drafted before Carmelo Anthony, Chris Bosh, Dwayne Wade.
Kevin Durant went second overall.
Zach Randolph went 20th, after perennial all stars Kirk Haston and Steven Hunter.
Drummond's "offensive" game is perfect for the league. Pick and roll, or rely on guards penetrating and dishing. With his size and athleticism, the right point guard is going to get him 2-3 alley oops a night. If he develops a somewhat decent low post game, he'll be an occasional all star and carve out a 12-15 year career. There's no reason he can't be a 10/10 guy as a rookie with the right team.
If Jake Voskuhl (9 years) and Travis Knight (7 years) can last that long, Drummond will be fine.