If the trend is for recruits to not sign the LOI, it's going to be progressively harder for coaches to assemble their recruiting classes since a recruit can back out at any time.
I wonder if you'll begin to see coaches over-recruit, if that would be even possible, where they can do the same thing these recruits are doing, backing off their word once they see what shakes out in the spring.
What's really going to happen (or has started happening the past few years) is that the highly ranked recruits, or better put, the recruits that believe there is great demand for them and they will likely be able to choose wherever they want to go, will not be signing any LOIs while those who feel their demand isn't quite as big will sign the LOIs to lock in a ship to where they want to land.
I might be wrong, but until the list of those who don't sign grows much larger than the top 10 or so (some top 20) recruits, UConn will not be impacted all that often. But that doesn't mean the impact won't have big ramifications. If UConn were to lose an elite player that fills a huge need, such as a PG for instance, it could make what could have been an elite team a flawed team if they were to lose that recruit late in the process and not have a legit D1 talent to replace that recruit.
The programs that could really feel its impact are the handful of programs that either have multiple soft commitments or are holding out for a bunch of elite recruits and end up losing them in the end.
Frankly, I'm conflicted with this. On one hand, I can't blame a recruit or his family who does not want to get screwed by some program (or the NCAA) that won't let them out of their LOI if they have a legit reason such as a coaching change, family situation, or the player is recruited over when the program told them they wouldn't. I'm sure there are some other reasons we could add to this list.
On the other hand, it's not fair for a program and its fans, to think they have a recruit (or recruits) that is filling a need who decides to bail after the program no longer has many options if any. In most instances, the up-and-up programs stop recruiting other players at their position.
I'm really not sure if there is any perfect process. There will be flaws no matter what one you choose and there will always be people who will abuse it.
As much as I can't blame Daniel for changing his mind, if that were to happen, I would still be pissed if he were to do so, since UConn would have likely been able to get a good recruit, probably not as good though, if that type of decision was made during the summer while there were still irons in the fire.