ESPN headquarters (as we all know) are in Connecticut, so it's not outrageous to think he gets a little annoyed at our fan base and enjoys getting under our skin from time to time. He's not a bad analyst at all - he gives good insight, and many times he's spot on with pointing out what's successful or unsuccessful. There are times, though, when he crosses lines. The Roscoe Smith comments were outrageous and almost to the level of a fireable offense, frankly - you can't be using your analyst chair to influence recruits. If he sat there and said Roscoe Smith should really go to Oklahoma State, it's a clear NCAA violation, and it isn't that far down that slope to try to influence recruits not to go places. Earlier this year, he also said Boatright was suspended six games for an "off court incident", which was an extremely poor choice of wording - the sort of wording that a professional broadcaster should get right. And be repimanded for if they don't.
His Boatright comments yesterday? He might not have been 100 percent incorrect, but I think he was off-base and it isn't out of bounds to call him on it (unlike, say, picking against us in the NCAA Tournament - who cares who analysts pick anyway?). He could have picked on anyone else besides Boatright and been spot on (or Roscoe - who played hard). Whatever moments of selfishness he might have displayed were snapshots in the middle of a day in which he battled pretty hard, and were more the product of a freshman dealing with getting his ass kicked for one of the few times in his life. Gottlieb pouted too as a player - especially when he watched what happened to his foul shots when they reached the rim.
Bilas did call out Drummond at one point - "what is he doing? On what level of basketball is that an acceptable shot?" And he was right. So nobody called him out on it. If you reversed those two comments, and had Bilas say "Boatright was terrible, selfish, etc." and Gottlieb saying the Drummond comments - we'd ignore Gottlieb and would be discussing Bilas. Except our condemnation would be more reserved ("Bilas is usually better than that," etc.), but that's the result of opinions that have been shaped over time.