.
I thought Ice and Jana were particularly ineffective especially against a smaller team. This is the 2nd game I can recall where we had a solid size disparity that we almost took no advantage of. I have a feeling Crooks will eat our post players alive and get them into foul trouble to boot.
Iowa State up next. The team is what it is - the Paige/Sarah show. Stop or slow them and against good teams, it will be a long night.
After today, and after Geno's comments in the last two post-game press conferences, I think you will see a lot more of "Sarah and 4 guards" starting Tuesday evening. When that lineup is in place, Sarah will be the one who deals with Crooks, and I think she will do fine. I think she has the strength to do it, and I'm fairly sure that she can out-leap Crooks any time she wants. Crooks may be able to take jump shots over her, but I wouldn't even bet on that.
Regarding the "Paige/Sarah show", don't forget about Azzi as far as scoring is concerned. Of course we don't know if Azzi will play against Iowa State, but if she does, UConn will have three (rather than two) serious scoring threats.
I also think that Morgan will see a lot of floor time, and the rebounding corps of Sarah / Morgan / Paige will probably be adequate against most teams, possibly including Iowa State.
Having said that, I think that Jana is already a top-level rebounder in the college game, even though the rest of her post skills need a lot of work. Ice is improving in that area, but still is not getting nearly enough rebounds. If the starting lineup is Sarah + four guards, then Jana may be an early substitute if a boost in rebounding is needed (anticipating that her contribution may be limited to that fairly narrow role).