And later regarding whether Tennessee can get back to the elite status: [after all the obligatory, "I feel bad for Holly" stuff] "Getting the right coach is aways a huge key. And getting someone who knows how to coach.... If they get the right person for that job I don't think it will take long for them to be back where they were. I don't think that's going to be very difficult at all."
Geno also makes a good case for NOT replacing an iconic coach who defined a program - who basically WAS the program - with a long-time assistant with no head coaching experience.
Going straight for the 'ideal' coach is also problematic, though. Immediately after a legend retires, the shadow of their reputation and presence and
results still looms large over the program. A successor coach in that position isn't just being measured against his or her D1 opponents, but also the expectations of the program itself.
I think that choosing Holly to be the immediate successor was the right call, both in respect for her long service and to serve as a gentle transition to the next era of the program. If she overperformed and Tennessee rocketed back to the top, keep her around. If not, gently ease her aside at the end of her contract in favor of the ideal coach you wanted all along.
The problem was that she was there too long after her limitations as a head coach became apparent. Yes, she was still winning some conference and tournament games based on the great talent she was still getting...and it's not easy to let go of a coach of a top 10 or top 20 team. But someone should have made the hard choice years ago.