Geno kills the traditional post player in WBB | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Geno kills the traditional post player in WBB

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
17,265
Reaction Score
154,424
Charlie Collier can shoot it from 3 and put the ball on the floor. She's got skills. As for the others, until I read that UConn has offered and they accept, they are just names of potential recruits.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
2,665
Reaction Score
11,786
Dawn is missing the experienced PG that can get the ball to the other players in the right position to score. Also Dawn's offense doesn't have a lot of motion in it which would enable A'ja and Coates to get easier shots. Will be interesting to see how Azura Stevens players next year as when she was at Duke she had a similar style of play as A'ja does. Azura does have more range in her shot then A'ja.

Her offense last night had a lot of motion, but only in one direction(across the lane). She was trying to foil Geno's switching by getting an unfavorable matchup on Crystal. It never worked.

By the way, where is the person who earlier this season posted about SC having the strongest four-player combo in WCBB? How is that opinion workin' for ya?!
 

SCGamecock

Carolina Sandlapper
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
3,087
Reaction Score
11,304
On another thread, it was correctly (I believe, as I've watched SC a couple of times this year) stated that Wilson and Coates ran out of steam..that UConn is the better conditioned club. I believe this strongly, just as the Patriots were better conditioned than the Falcons. Geno's and Belichick's practices are legendarily tough, and it pays off in big games when adrenaline runs havoc, creating highs and lows, and one team tends to play more up tempo.

???????????????

That's great and all but I wasn't talking about SC's conditioning in relation to UCONN's.. call SC out of shape and slow, that's fine, I'm not arguing that. That's another conversation.

But that's not the reason Wilson didn't produce as effectively in the 2nd half.. its because she was double and triple teamed. Wilson is well equipped to play 4 quarters. Her effectiveness decreased because she was being defended differently (and occasionally fouled, but I digress on THAT subject as well).
 

Monte

Count of Monte UConn
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
2,108
Reaction Score
6,701
On another thread, it was correctly (I believe, as I've watched SC a couple of times this year) stated that Wilson and Coates ran out of steam..that UConn is the better conditioned club. I believe this strongly, just as the Patriots were better conditioned than the Falcons. Geno's and Belichick's practices are legendarily tough, and it pays off in big games when adrenaline runs havoc, creating highs and lows, and one team tends to play more up tempo.
That's just what I was thinking. Conditioning+Athletic Ability, that's where Uconn excels.
That is why they pulled away and padded the lead in the second half.
 

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
17,265
Reaction Score
154,424
???????????????

That's great and all but I wasn't talking about SC's conditioning in relation to UCONN's.. call SC out of shape and slow, that's fine, I'm not arguing that. That's another conversation.

But that's not the reason Wilson didn't produce as effectively in the 2nd half.. its because she was double and triple teamed. Wilson is well equipped to play 4 quarters. Her effectiveness decreased because she was being defended differently (and fouled).
I agree with your analysis. While we tend to focus on Wilson & Coates, they were not the real problem for the Gamecocks last night,

Gray, Davis & Harris were a combined 7-28 (25%) from the floor, and an anemic 3-17 from 3. We had heard so much about Gray & Davis in particular that I was truly concerned that they would make the Huskies pay a price when they tried to double-team Wilson & Coates.

With no one to take the pressure off from outside UConn could swarm SC's bigs all night long.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
5,306
Reaction Score
28,416
???????????????
That's great and all but I wasn't talking about SC's conditioning in relation to UCONN's.. call SC out of shape and slow, that's fine, I'm not arguing that. That's another conversation.
But that's not the reason Wilson didn't produce as effectively in the 2nd half.. its because she was double and triple teamed. Wilson is well equipped to play 4 quarters. Her effectiveness decreased because she was being defended differently (and occasionally fouled, but I digress on THAT subject as well).
Well, ?????????????? right back at ya! :)

I think I've offered an explanation that is fuller than just saying she was double teamed. If that was all it takes, every alpha player would be double teamed and therefore no longer be an alpha player. It takes a huge amount of energy to double and triple team a player, and it takes a huge amount of energy for that double/triple teamed player to respond appropriately by finding the open teammate. Energy counts a lot in this. That's called conditioning.
 

SCGamecock

Carolina Sandlapper
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
3,087
Reaction Score
11,304
Well, ?????????????? right back at ya! :)

I think I've offered an explanation that is fuller than just saying she was double teamed. If that was all it takes, every alpha player would be double teamed and therefore no longer be an alpha player. It takes a huge amount of energy to double and triple team a player, and it takes a huge amount of energy for that double/triple teamed player to respond appropriately by finding the open teammate. Energy counts a lot in this. That's called conditioning.

You're entitled to your opinion. I was at the game, sitting relatively close to the South Carolina bench and Wilson's conditioning didn't seem like an issue to ME. But spin this however you want.. Good game last night, good luck the rest of the way.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
6,029
Reaction Score
32,207
You're entitled to your opinion. I was at the game, sitting relatively close to the South Carolina bench and Wilson's conditioning didn't seem like an issue to ME. But spin this however you want.. Good game last night, good luck the rest of the way.

I am not saying she was or wasn't conditioned but her frustration wasn't a very good look.
 

Ozzie Nelson

RIP, Ozzie
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,247
Reaction Score
4,604
You're entitled to your opinion. I was at the game, sitting relatively close to the South Carolina bench and Wilson's conditioning didn't seem like an issue to ME. But spin this however you want.. Good game last night, good luck the rest of the way.

Wilson's body language suggested to me that she was frustrated with her teammates. She needs to just play on.

IAC, she is a fine player. No need to spin anything for anyone...SC just got beat. Most of us knew it would happen in the second half. Make of that what you will.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
5,306
Reaction Score
28,416
You're entitled to your opinion. I was at the game, sitting relatively close to the South Carolina bench and Wilson's conditioning didn't seem like an issue to ME. But spin this however you want.. Good game last night, good luck the rest of the way.
I don't dispute that she's a well-conditioned athlete. She certainly is (just as Falcon's football players were well-conditioned). I'm just pointing out that there are situations in which super-conditioning can be the difference in implementing a successful strategy. Even from body-types, it's apparent that the UConn front line can simply run at a higher motor. Not that Geno even recruited for that. But it just happens when you pair Gabby and Pheesa against Coates and Wilson, you have to make the best of your virtues against your deficits. And the virtue is that UConn players are in even better conditioned than the (well-conditioned) SC players.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,334
Reaction Score
25,045
View attachment 19747
"I don't know about you," as Andy Rooney used to say, but I'll be very happy next year to have Azura and Batouly playing around the key. OD's point, however, about versatile Bigs certainly is true about those transfers; they can do more than act as monoliths.
I didn't like him as much as his son Mickey Rooney--.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
357
Reaction Score
562
Both of them have temperament issues to a greater or lesser extent
that Dawn has not been able to modify
Reminds me a wee bit of UTenn
Dawn's mea culpa the other day with regard getting the kids to listen (or perform to a standard)
is evidence of a certain weakness in her program, not apparent in the best ones.
Even Muffet complained this year (after a poor loss) of a similar issue.

Geno complains as well that kids have changed..and them he changes them back..or whatever magic he performs.
When Wilson (I think, I don't remember) got T'd up for colorful language Dawn did not address the issue. She said in the presser afterwards that she wasn't going to either. Temperament issues need to be nipped in the bud early or you spend your coaching career tape dancing around them. Could be why they are always coming up short in big games (IMO). Imagine one of Geno's players gettting a tech for that, he would lose his mind!
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,334
Reaction Score
25,045
That's just what I was thinking. Conditioning+Athletic Ability, that's where Uconn excels.
That is why they pulled away and padded the lead in the second half.
I;ve posted that as Geno's secret weapon--every year he works hard during summers on conditioning--it's not so secret. Geno has had great success with bigger team due to fast/quick/ conditioned smaller players--which alone is amazing. Geno's lazy comments are directed toward the younger players who find conditioning as work--and not a needed Basketball asset.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,346
Reaction Score
221,457
PLEASE--NO freak!! She uses her parent given talent to an extent never seen--but certainly---she is not in any terms of the meaning of the word--a freak!! She is OUR girl!! She is OUR talent. She is OUR savior in the USC game. She is OUR Gabby!!! No freak!! Please.
Lol, freak is pretty much the ultimate complement. Her athleticism, speed, strength reaction time is super human.

I've used that phrase from time to time on the board and have awaited someone making your post. I get your point but know it is meant with admiration and respect.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,334
Reaction Score
25,045
???????????????

That's great and all but I wasn't talking about SC's conditioning in relation to UCONN's.. call SC out of shape and slow, that's fine, I'm not arguing that. That's another conversation.

But that's not the reason Wilson didn't produce as effectively in the 2nd half.. its because she was double and triple teamed. Wilson is well equipped to play 4 quarters. Her effectiveness decreased because she was being defended differently (and occasionally fouled, but I digress on THAT subject as well).
\

As a dyed in the wool Uconn Fan--I agree with you. Your kids, for the most part, ran with Uconn. Aja was , like Katie Lou, held in check by defense. The University of South Carolina played their best and played hard--Geno and us fans would have it no other way.
USC as Uconn were hampered by bad calls, ticky tack, invisible call---a couple near the end terrible. But we both were hammered by the refs--which to me is fair calling--if a ref can't call a game with talent, then at least call it fairly--they did. 17 uconn fouls 18 USC..
 

UcMiami

How it is
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,190
Reaction Score
47,266
Oldude - interesting but I don't think it is all that accurate for a few reasons:
1. One of the issues with the big man/woman center is god only makes a few of them every decade it seems, and there are a lot more teams than 'bigs' to go around, so it has always been an issue for most teams to figure out a way to counteract the few teams that have the big guys. Three point shooting certainly helps, and speed and smarts and passing have all been countermeasures. But the Griners and Jabars will always have a place at the table when they come along because they do pose serious issues for the teams that aren't lucky enough to snag one of them. In the pros where true zone defenses are not allowed you can force them outside on defense usually and that creates a problem for them, but in college where defensive three seconds doesn't exist ...

2. Geno certainly didn't create the idea of multifunctional undersized posts, most people attribute it to European basketball imports to the pros. Rebecca, Lauren Jackson, EDD, and Stewart all have exhibited that inside and outside skill, but they have all performed best when paired with a more traditional post player. If Geno had Tina Charles still on hist roster she would being taking a lot of minutes away from Gabby or Napheesa and Geno would be more relaxed about the outcome of the season! Next year and the year after he will be really happy to have BIG options in the lineup. This team is lots of fun to watch and root for and they are playing fabulous basketball, but the NC trophy hasn't been engraved yet!

3. For just a moment, fantasize about what might have been had Wilson chosen UConn! I think she and Geno would have made a pretty good match, and UConn would be even more dominant right now. OK - back to reality, love this team, and what they have done, but Gabby and Napheesa are also pretty unique players, and I wouldn't like to plug two other 6'1/5'11 players into their roles - can't think of another two playing college ball right know that would be getting it done, can you? So ... the formula depends on two unique players, not something that will start a trend!
 

SCGamecock

Carolina Sandlapper
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
3,087
Reaction Score
11,304
Wilson's body language suggested to me that she was frustrated with her teammates. She needs to just play on.

IAC, she is a fine player. No need to spin anything for anyone..SC just got beat. Most of us knew it would happen in the second half. Make of that what you will.

"SC just got beat"... exactly. I thought the 2nd half adjustment that Geno made on our post players worked marvelously.. sure, conditioning is a part of the game.. but it wasn't as big a part of the game as some here are trying to suggest it was. Some here are comparing Gabby and Napheesa's conditioning to Coates and Wilson.. . that's ridiculous, of course they are in better shape to run the floor.. they are GUARDS.. Wilson and Coates are post players, big ones at that. Maybe they should compare Wilson and Coates to Natalie Butler. Wilson has played longer stretches in far more physical games (Mississippi State for example).. her conditioning was not the reason she faltered in the 2nd half. The bottom line is that she was well defended, and that's kudos to Geno and UConn.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
357
Reaction Score
562
I;ve posted that as Geno's secret weapon--every year he works hard during summers on conditioning--it's not so secret. Geno has had great success with bigger team due to fast/quick/ conditioned smaller players--which alone is amazing. Geno's lazy comments are directed toward the younger players who find conditioning as work--and not a needed Basketball asset.
Those younger players never know what real conditioning is until they step up to the college level. They got by in HS on what conditioning was offered to them or what they did on their own. Not all take it seriously to do on their own. I would guess they are shell shocked when they hit the gym in college which is probably why he starts in the summer. Women in general lack upper body strength which (IMO) is needed to compete in the post to put that ball back up over and over again. That could take the wind out of one if they aren't is shape.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,560
Reaction Score
88,266
Your kids, for the most part, ran with Uconn.

I agree, but that "for the most part" represents the margin of victory; a handful of trips down the floor. There's fit, then there's UConn fit.
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
673
Reaction Score
1,018
You're entitled to your opinion. I was at the game, sitting relatively close to the South Carolina bench and Wilson's conditioning didn't seem like an issue to ME. But spin this however you want.. Good game last night, good luck the rest of the way.
I agree with you SGGamecock. I think Aja is a vey skilled and athleic player who seems well conditioned. Problem is they do not have great floor balance, nor the overall starting five " talent " the huskies have. But then , noone does. Eventually , it does come down to talent, and how the talented pieces fit togeher. As I stated in pre-ame post. Gamecocks would have to either find way to score more, or stop huskies from scoring. Hack and grab worked for almost a whole half.
 

SCGamecock

Carolina Sandlapper
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
3,087
Reaction Score
11,304
I agree with you SGGamecock. I think Aja is a vey skilled and athleic player who seems well conditioned. Problem is they do not have great floor balance, nor the overall starting five " talent " the huskies have. But then , noone does. Eventually , it does come down to talent, and how the talented pieces fit togeher. As I stated in pre-ame post. Gamecocks would have to either find way to score more, or stop huskies from scoring. Hack and grab worked for almost a whole half.

I'm blown away by Gabby Williams. It's one thing to see her on TV, but in person.. it's breathtaking. If she's not a 1st or 2nd team All-American then the entire thing is a scam.
 

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
17,265
Reaction Score
154,424
Oldude - interesting but I don't think it is all that accurate for a few reasons:
1. One of the issues with the big man/woman center is god only makes a few of them every decade it seems, and there are a lot more teams than 'bigs' to go around, so it has always been an issue for most teams to figure out a way to counteract the few teams that have the big guys. Three point shooting certainly helps, and speed and smarts and passing have all been countermeasures. But the Griners and Jabars will always have a place at the table when they come along because they do pose serious issues for the teams that aren't lucky enough to snag one of them. In the pros where true zone defenses are not allowed you can force them outside on defense usually and that creates a problem for them, but in college where defensive three seconds doesn't exist ..

2. Geno certainly didn't create the idea of multifunctional undersized posts, most people attribute it to European basketball imports to the pros. Rebecca, Lauren Jackson, EDD, and Stewart all have exhibited that inside and outside skill, but they have all performed best when paired with a more traditional post player. If Geno had Tina Charles still on hist roster she would being taking a lot of minutes away from Gabby or Napheesa and Geno would be more relaxed about the outcome of the season! Next year and the year after he will be really happy to have BIG options in the lineup. This team is lots of fun to watch and root for and they are playing fabulous basketball, but the NC trophy hasn't been engraved yet!

3. For just a moment, fantasize about what might have been had Wilson chosen UConn! I think she and Geno would have made a pretty good match, and UConn would be even more dominant right now. OK - back to reality, love this team, and what they have done, but Gabby and Napheesa are also pretty unique players, and I wouldn't like to plug two other 6'1/5'11 players into their roles - can't think of another two playing college ball right know that would be getting it done, can you? So .. the formula depends on two unique players, not something that will start a trend!
Agree with most of your points, but would point out that you can play zone in the NBA so long as you don't camp in the lane.

Jabbar is my exhibit A on what has changed in basketball. When he played the Lakers would dump the ball into him over & over again and he would shoot skyhook after skyhook over some hapless defender.

Griner is Exhibit B. She was the most dominant player in WBB for the 4 yrs she played at Baylor and they only won a single national championship.

One final point, and this may be sacrilegious, given the importance Geno places on athletic, multi-skilled BIGS, he might not have recruited Tina Charles out of HS, although she developed tremendously throughout her time at UConn and into the pros.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,334
Reaction Score
25,045
???????????????

That's great and all but I wasn't talking about SC's conditioning in relation to UCONN's.. call SC out of shape and slow, that's fine, I'm not arguing that. That's another conversation.

But that's not the reason Wilson didn't produce as effectively in the 2nd half.. its because she was double and triple teamed. Wilson is well equipped to play 4 quarters. Her effectiveness decreased because she was being defended differently (and occasionally fouled, but I digress on THAT subject as well).
\

As a dyed in the wool Uconn Fan--I agree with you. Your kids, for the most part, ran with Uconn. Aja was , like Katie Lou, held in check by defense. The University of South Carolina played their best and played hard--Geno and us fans would have it no other way.
USC as Uconn were hampered by bad calls, ticky tack, invisible call---a couple near the end terrible. But we both were hammered by the refs--which to me is fair calling--if a ref can't call a game with talent, then at least call it fairly--they did. 17 uconn fouls 18 USC..
 

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
1,397
Total visitors
1,551

Forum statistics

Threads
159,623
Messages
4,198,019
Members
10,065
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom