Geno Image with Recruit Father | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Geno Image with Recruit Father

Status
Not open for further replies.

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,258
Reaction Score
59,860
You forgot Andra Espinoza-Hunter. She is also a guard.
Not til the following year. (if you were talking to me that is) At which point Chong is gone.
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
179
Reaction Score
762
Maybe that's a good idea recruit the parents first lol
But it seems dad is really a fan of Geno. This is great news if she visit. Morgan is from iIllinois. And if we can get Cox also. Geno would be the closest thing to GOD!!!!
GOD !?!? How about just one of the Apostles?
 

Sluconn Husky

#1 Source of Info
Joined
May 22, 2014
Messages
17,472
Reaction Score
76,670
I don't think Tuck leaves early. Either way, I'm not sure some of you have mapped out the PT situation. It's going to be chaotic. Unless the plan is for everyone to get 10 minutes a game.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
Messages
842
Reaction Score
2,870
I don't think Tuck leaves early. Either way, I'm not sure some of you have mapped out the PT situation. It's going to be chaotic. Unless the plan is for everyone to get 10 minutes a game.
No problem. The starting five average 25 minutes. The top 3 bench average 15 minutes. the remaining 5 split 30 minutes as merited. Of course in some blowouts, the starters might only use 100 minutes, in which case, the bench gets 25 more minutes.
 

Sluconn Husky

#1 Source of Info
Joined
May 22, 2014
Messages
17,472
Reaction Score
76,670
No problem. The starting five average 25 minutes. The top 3 bench average 15 minutes. the remaining 5 split 30 minutes as merited. Of course in some blowouts, the starters might only use 100 minutes, in which case, the bench gets 25 more minutes.

So say the starters by '16 are Tuck, KLS, Butler, Nurse, and Dangerfield (that's another discussion).

The bench then consists of Collier, Boykin, Williams, Ekmark, Chong, Irwin, Cox, McCoy in this scenario.

Who gets 15 minutes? NC, Williams, Chong? First, that's fewer minutes for Williams and Chong then they get this year as frosh/sophs. Second, Collier may be an AA player by then.

Beyond that, you're going to give players like Boykin, Cox, and McCoy an average of 5 minutes per game? That's barely more than Tierney Lawlor gets when she plays.

I'm not seeing how this is no problem.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,372
Reaction Score
16,023
I don't understand why so many BYers believe Morgan Tuck will not use her RShirt year? After all the injury time lost and her good health and her success this season she wouldn't miss that RShirt year for anything! She's having the time of her life plus she's one of the prominent leaders of the team she wouldn't want to leave her teammates high & dry!
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,258
Reaction Score
59,860
Silverio Ford suggests UConn just now made offers to both Cox and McCoy during the home visits. That strikes as hard to believe, but maybe he knows something. If you don't know, Ford does evaluation and has his own website.

https://twitter.com/LovePeopleSpts/status/576049678380331008
Why in the world would that be hard to believe. They are both very good players. If Geno thinks they'll fit in with UCONN, why not offer them?
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,258
Reaction Score
59,860
So say the starters by '16 are Tuck, KLS, Butler, Nurse, and Dangerfield (that's another discussion).

The bench then consists of Collier, Boykin, Williams, Ekmark, Chong, Irwin, Cox, McCoy in this scenario.

Who gets 15 minutes? NC, Williams, Chong? First, that's fewer minutes for Williams and Chong then they get this year as frosh/sophs. Second, Collier may be an AA player by then.

Beyond that, you're going to give players like Boykin, Cox, and McCoy an average of 5 minutes per game? That's barely more than Tierney Lawlor gets when she plays.

I'm not seeing how this is no problem.
Geno didn't seem to have problems with it back in 2000 and 2001, when he had lots of great players. Besides it's his problem (if it is), not ours. And besides, there will always be injuries, transfers, busts. I don't think Geno has ever had too many players.
 

HuskyNan

You Know Who
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
24,928
Reaction Score
201,942
Dad looks TALL! Seems fine to me :). Why wasn't Tori in the picture?:oops:
If a picture of a recruit and potential coach is taken by anyone in the press and published, it's an NCAA violation, believe it or not. UConn also cannot post pictures of recruits. Kids and their families, however, are free to post whatever pictures they like. So, as to your question, if it was taken for a newspaper, Tori couldn't be in the photo.
 

JoePgh

Cranky pants and wise acre
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
3,649
Reaction Score
21,246
Sluconn Husky said:
Silverio Ford suggests UConn just now made offers to both Cox and McCoy during the home visits. That strikes as hard to believe, but maybe he knows something. If you don't know, Ford does evaluation and has his own website.

https://twitter.com/LovePeopleSpts/status/576049678380331008

Maybe he said to both Lauren and Tori, "I've got one slot. Whichever one of you accepts first gets that slot, and I will pull the other offer. "

I agree that at some point, possibly as soon as next year, having too many high-potential forwards becomes a difficult problem to manage.
 

DobbsRover2

Slap me 10
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,329
Reaction Score
6,720
Williams might play guard after this year. I expect her outside shooting to pick up sharply and make her a really formidable guard who can post up opponents.
Yeah, this year UConn spent a good part of the year with just three guards MoJeff-Nurse-Chong, and Williams playing a forward role because that was where she was needed on the reserves. It wasn't till fairly late that Ekmark joined the group for more minutes. So a group of Nurse-Chong-Ekmark-Dangerfield with Williams moved back to guard seems like a deep enough unit. Even if the 3-pt shot never develops for her, Williams can be almost the same type of player as Baylor's Nina Davis (not a bad model, and who never shoots a 3) who is Williams' height and plays a quasi guard-forward role like Gabby does crashing the boards for rebounds and going inside for a quick feed and bucket. It's a very difficult type of player for opponents to deal with, and would give UConn with Williams' incredible vertical leap a huge height advantage over virtually any other team.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,372
Reaction Score
16,023
IMO I think that Gabby Williams will stay at small Forward for the rest of her UCONN career because she is a match-up nightmare for most opponents! Granted there are times her height will be a problem but being 5'11" doesn't hold Nina Davis of Baylor back! More times than not Gabby will have big success because of her off-the-charts athletic ability! Plus as she learns the game her shooting will step out from under the basket to 10' to 12' range!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
296
Reaction Score
334
Why in the world would that be hard to believe. They are both very good players. If Geno thinks they'll fit in with UCONN, why not offer them?

I'm thinking the poster was referring to the fact that Geno JUST offered them. I would have assumed he would have offered a while ago.
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,258
Reaction Score
59,860
I'm thinking the poster was referring to the fact that Geno JUST offered them. I would have assumed he would have offered a while ago.
Maybe, would certainly make more sense. But Slu is one of those "we have too many good players, how we gonna play them all" guys. So, I'm not sure.
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
IMO I think that Gabby Williams will stay at small Forward for the rest of her UCONN career because she is a match-up nightmare for most opponents! Granted there are times her height will be a problem but being 5'11" doesn't hold Nina Davis of Baylor back! More times than not Gabby will have big success because of her off-the-charts athletic ability! Plus as she learns the game her shooting will step out from under the basket to 10' to 12' range!
I agree with you that Gabby will ultimately end up a SF with improved shooting. The only issue with that outlook is that SF might be the most loaded spot on the UCONN roster as soon as next year. Tuck, Boykin, Samuelson & Collier, & Ekmark are all capable of playing the position. I can't wait until mid April rolls around when someone will post a thread about next years starters so I might as well get this out of the way now-IMO Gabby will not be starter until her senior year if ever.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
9,874
Reaction Score
29,425
Great problem to have..
Yup - just ask Brenda Freese. When you have this problem you don't really need to coach. You can just revert to the Woody Allen theory that 90% of success is showing up.
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,258
Reaction Score
59,860
If a picture of a recruit and potential coach is taken by anyone in the press and published, it's an NCAA violation, believe it or not. UConn also cannot post pictures of recruits. Kids and their families, however, are free to post whatever pictures they like. So, as to your question, if it was taken for a newspaper, Tori couldn't be in the photo.
I believe one of Pat's problems.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,635
Reaction Score
25,766
The only odd thing about the offers is that I was under the impression that UConn didn't offer a scholarship until a recruit made a visit to Storrs.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,651
Reaction Score
14,696
Maybe, would certainly make more sense. But Slu is one of those "we have too many good players, how we gonna play them all" guys. So, I'm not sure.
Slu is right in this case.
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
The only odd thing about the offers is that I was under the impression that UConn didn't offer a scholarship until a recruit made a visit to Storrs.
Good point I thought that was the old way of doing business based on Geno offering and getting burned before the Kid made an official visit. Am I mis-remembering again?
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
Messages
842
Reaction Score
2,870
I agree with you that Gabby will ultimately end up a SF with improved shooting. The only issue with that outlook is that SF might be the most loaded spot on the UCONN roster as soon as next year. Tuck, Boykin, Samuelson & Collier, & Ekmark are all capable of playing the position. I can't wait until mid April rolls around when someone will post a thread about next years starters so I might as well get this out of the way now-IMO Gabby will not be starter until her senior year if ever.
Of course you could be correct. The competition will be unbelievable. But I'm betting on the gabblous one to start in her junior year, if not late next year. Her talent is sky high. And she is just learning the UConn offense after missing essentially two years of high school basketball.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
Messages
842
Reaction Score
2,870
So say the starters by '16 are Tuck, KLS, Butler, Nurse, and Dangerfield (that's another discussion).

The bench then consists of Collier, Boykin, Williams, Ekmark, Chong, Irwin, Cox, McCoy in this scenario.

Who gets 15 minutes? NC, Williams, Chong? First, that's fewer minutes for Williams and Chong then they get this year as frosh/sophs. Second, Collier may be an AA player by then.

Beyond that, you're going to give players like Boykin, Cox, and McCoy an average of 5 minutes per game? That's barely more than Tierney Lawlor gets when she plays.

I'm not seeing how this is no problem.
Well, ok, let's just say it's a manageable problem. As you indicate your suggested roster is open to much discussion. Tuck my not be with us. The extraordinary Dangerfield might start, but might not. Williams might be a starter. Cox or McCoy or both might not choose UConn. These things have a way of working themselves out. Durr and Edwards will not be clogging the guard position next year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
357
Guests online
3,749
Total visitors
4,106

Forum statistics

Threads
157,132
Messages
4,084,732
Members
9,980
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom