This is not going to be one of my more popular posts, but I'm going to say it anyway.
If "idiots" are questioning whether she should be starting, does Geno lump himself in that category? After all, he made a decision to bring Caroline off the bench. Yes, he reversed the decision, but that seemed to be more about how Breanna played and what he thought she needed than Caroline's play earning her the right to start again. In fact, I think both players responded poorly; Caroline was simply not a factor against UMD or Penn State.
It's great that Caroline played at such a high level against Oregon, but her numbers against quality opposition have been less-than-stellar:
A&M- 5 points, 2 rebounds, 4 assists, 3 TOs
Purdue- 3 points, 0 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 TOs
Maryland- 0 points, 4 rebounds, 1 assist, 3 TOs
Penn State- 0 points, 0 rebounds, 0 assists, 2 TOs
Stanford- 0 points, 2 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 TO
______________________________________
Total- 1.6 points, 1.6 rebounds, 1.6 assists, 2.2 TOs
That is not filling up a stat sheet.
Now, to be fair, a lot of what she brings to the table is maturity, steadiness, and an ability to get the offense set at points when it's being pressured. Those things don't necessarily show up on a stat sheet. That being said, she is going to have to step it up against more athletic backcourts such as Baylor, Notre Dame, and Duke. Certainly, everyone who roots for UConn hopes she does and would be very happy for her if she did. And it's quite possible that UConn's national championship hopes depend on it.