cohenzone
Old Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 19,205
- Reaction Score
- 23,702
To take nothing from Geno; his teams are tremendous, both on the court and as ambassadors for our university, but he can't hold a candle to Jim Calhoun in terms of what they did to elevate the university.
Jim put us on the map first, Geno took it to new heights, but, in the end, Geno coaches a women's basketball team. The money is in men's hoops, and although Geno has more wins than Jim, more national titles than Jim, and has a better program in his game than Jim ever did, Jim Calhoun did more for this school than Geno has.
And I mean that with no disrespect toward Geno. Really, I don't. But when you talk about exposure, and making money, men's basketball to women's basketball is like comparing a company winning an award in the Wall Street Journal versus winning an award in the Hartford Courant.
Geno should be proud of his and his team's accomplishments, but should respect that Jim Calhoun means more to UConn. And I'm glad he does.
Too bad when these "professionals" , meaning these highly paid coaches, get into this sort of discussion. I follow both teams, and although I was not a fan of some of JC's behavior on the court, I'm of a mind that the Rent could well have been named for him. No big success in men's hoops, no real thought of moving up from the old D1A football. If all that UConn had to offer the national sports scene was the women's hoop program, the impact nationally on other UConn sports would have been hard to notice if existent at all, in much the same way that Joe Morrone's pretty successful soccer program had no impact on the school recognition. It's still the way it is whether or not it makes sense, because women's hoops still has a much smaller niche than men's hoops.
That women's hoops nationally has much greater visibility than it did 2o years ago is pretty much attributable to Geno, whether Tennessee fans like it or not. As a coach within his sport, he has no peers, but his competition was much narrower at the beginning. Jim Calhoun had to play in a much bigger pond, and was in the position from day one of having to be the guy to remove UConn from the expert analysis that UConn didn't belong in the Big East. He also proved something that I had argued with friends about for years, and that was he dispelled the idea that great players wouldn't come to play in Storrs. My argument always was, if they'll go to Lawrence, Kansas, why would Storrs be so unthinkable? I think as far as coaching goes, JC had more flaws than GA, but he also had to maintain a pretty high level against much stiffer competition over a long period of time, not only in terms of recruiting, but in terms of game by game competition.
Bottom line is, that if this is any sort of story, that's a shame because both of them are extraordinary as basketball coaches and as life coaches to the kids who play(ed) for them.