Not quite 100 % on concessions as local groups run some of them for fund raising.UConn gets 0% of money for concessions at the XL and pays rent.
UConn gets 100% of money from concessions at Gampel and doesn’t pay rent.
This. Isn’t. Difficult. Math.
I could never.L
Bruh. Next time just shoot me in the back of the head.
You had a justification for four glasses of scotch. What’s the problem?L
Bruh. Next time just shoot me in the back of the head.
Does the team have an advantage in Gampel over XL? There has to be a way to prove, disprove that hypothesis with data. I don't think records, or even record against ranked opponents works. I think a good guide would be record in games against Quad 1 foes.L
Bruh. Next time just shoot me in the back of the head.
UConn gets 0% of money for concessions at the XL and pays rent.
UConn gets 100% of money from concessions at Gampel and doesn’t pay rent.
This. Isn’t. Difficult. Math.
Yeah, but the Carolina fans don’t have to go through customs to cross the Connecticut River, then again in Bolton. And you need to remember your passport…real hassle.Crazy that UNC fans can do the drive from Raleigh to Chapel Hill, yet some UConn “fans” here can’t do the same from Hartford to Storrs. Those people should be embarrassed.
I’m sure when UConn lost at Gampel to Yale, Wagner, St Joseph’s, and Northeastern no one was campaigning to play all games at XL.Does the team have an advantage in Gampel over XL? There has to be a way to prove, disprove that hypothesis with data. I don't think records, or even record against ranked opponents works. I think a good guide would be record in games against Quad 1 foes.
Then, if we see that Gampel is significantly a better homecourt the frustration with hartford is valid.
My only other point, they've been going to Hartford for 43 years, this is always talked about when UConn loses a game and the crowd sucks. UConn is different from every other team and program in the country.
No one else has two homes. Why? No one else is UConn. Why can't UConn be different?
Playing in hartford allows this program to run a $40M deficit and allowed it to upgrade its football.
I'm guessing they wouldn't lose much in seat donations. The games still have to be played, which means seat donations would just be collected for Gampel instead of XL. Sure, there might be fewer seats available, but that also means UConn can ask for a higher price.How much do you think they'd lose in donations?
Much more significant than concessions. Especially concessions at GP
Does anyone even buy concessions at GP?
Is there a separate seat donation for XL and Gampel If you have tix at both?I'm guessing they wouldn't lose much in seat donations. The games still have to be played, which means seat donations would just be collected for Gampel instead of XL. Sure, there might be fewer seats available, but that also means UConn can ask for a higher price.
They sell beer at Gampel now. I'm pretty sure they sell a lot of concessions.
No evidence, just a guess? The facts are that Gampel season tickets don't sell out now and you are guessing that more would be sold if the number of games you were required to buy and the seat donation both doubled. Does that make sense? Like I said before, they are already shaking the giving tree pretty hard right now but folks like you just expect others just to plunk down another $1K per seat? I think that's a pipe dream.I'm guessing they wouldn't lose much in seat donations. The games still have to be played, which means seat donations would just be collected for Gampel instead of XL. Sure, there might be fewer seats available, but that also means UConn can ask for a higher price.
YesIs there a separate seat donation for XL and Gampel If you have tix at both?
I have no evidence, that is correct. I don't claim to be doing anything other than baselessly speculating. I gave you a hard time about evidence earlier because, when you were asked to provide some, you made up numbers off the top of your head and called it evidence.No evidence, just a guess? The facts are that Gampel season tickets don't sell out now and you are guessing that more would be sold if the number of games you were required to buy and the seat donation both doubled. Does that make sense? Like I said before, they are already shaking the giving tree pretty hard right now but folks like you just expect others just to plunk down another $1K per seat? I think that's a pipe dream.
If you have tickets both for gample and for the XL Center aren’t you already paying the extra license fee?No evidence, just a guess? The facts are that Gampel season tickets don't sell out now and you are guessing that more would be sold if the number of games you were required to buy and the seat donation both doubled. Does that make sense? Like I said before, they are already shaking the giving tree pretty hard right now but folks like you just expect others just to plunk down another $1K per seat? I think that's a pipe dream.
Kind of, since paying to play in Hartford and East Hartford is contributing to the $40 million deficit.Playing in hartford allows this program to run a $40M deficit and allowed it to upgrade its football.
UConn can definitely be different, but they should only choose to be different when it benefits them. I’m not sure that playing in Hartford really does.No one else has two homes. Why? No one else is UConn. Why can't UConn be different?
That’s what I thought. So with all games at Gampel and less seats these prices could potentially at minimum double to make up the revenue.Yes
My issue is not with wins and losses, it’s that continuing to play a large number of sports far off campus is indicative of a school and state government that still doesn’t truly grasp how college athletics works - that lack of understanding contributed to UConn getting left behind in conference realignment, despite our winning history, and yet we don’t learnDoes the team have an advantage in Gampel over XL? There has to be a way to prove, disprove that hypothesis with data. I don't think records, or even record against ranked opponents works. I think a good guide would be record in games against Quad 1 foes.
Then, if we see that Gampel is significantly a better homecourt the frustration with hartford is valid.
My only other point, they've been going to Hartford for 43 years, this is always talked about when UConn loses a game and the crowd sucks. UConn is different from every other team and program in the country.
No one else has two homes. Why? No one else is UConn. Why can't UConn be different?
Playing in hartford allows this program to run a $40M deficit and allowed it to upgrade its football.
Drove down to Bridgeport once - what a disaster. Missed the 1st 10 minutes of the game trying to park the car.New to this thread so maybe someone else voiced this but only big guaranteed sellouts should be played at the XL. I used to be a ticket holder there but came to hate the upper bowl and will now pay a premium for better seats to a few select games. Also wish they'd go back to playing a game or 2 in Bridgeport.
BingoMy issue is not with wins and losses, it’s that continuing to play a large number of sports far off campus is indicative of a school and state government that still doesn’t truly grasp how college athletics works - that lack of understanding contributed to UConn getting left behind in conference realignment, despite our winning history, and yet we don’t learn
Yeah if you try to get near the arena it could be a diaster.Drove down to Bridgeport once - what a disaster. Missed the 1st 10 minutes of the game trying to park the car.
That arena is a disaster.Drove down to Bridgeport once - what a disaster. Missed the 1st 10 minutes of the game trying to park the car.