Another example of shock fabricated for TV that doesn't add anything to the story. They are all backfill in time to replace the Ironborn/Pyke storyline with Sansa still at the Vale, Stannis's family still at Castle Black with Jon Snow, Jamie in the River lands and a whole cast of characters in Dorne and Essos. Just to give you an idea how far they've strayed.
HBO Stannis is a baaaaaad man. Still, that greyscale visage of Shireen's made me want to itch every time she was on camera. Won't be sorry never to see it again.
Agreed. Seemed way gratuitous, and just for extra shock value.By far the weakest penultimate episode in the series so far. "well we cut off Neds head, We had the red wedding, and we had the epic mountain/viper battle. How can we top that? " Tough bar to live up to though because the other 4 have been stupendous. They would have been better off flip flopping Hardhome episode with the Dances with Dragons episode if they were going to do it at all. While this hasn't happened in the books, and maybe it will, maybe it wont, I don't like the way it was done on the show. Although maybe it is just the father of a daughter in me talking. It takes a lot to disgust me. That disgusted me.Another example of shock fabricated for TV that doesn't add anything to the story. They are all backfill in time to replace the Ironborn/Pyke storyline with Sansa still at the Vale, Stannis's family still at Castle Black with Jon Snow, Jamie in the River lands and a whole cast of characters in Dorne and Essos. Just to give you an idea how far they've strayed.
All in a matter of 10 minutes as well.Say what you want about this season, but the writers seem to find new ways to top themselves. I didn't think they would be able to create a more hated figure than Ramsey or Joffery....but Stannis just took that crown with room to spare.
It's gratuitous in its placement. It was a weak build and was thrown on Ep 9 just to shock the shit out of you. It certainly defines his (lack of ) character but like many other things in this VERY uneven season (Dorne, Faith militant etc...) it was plotted out poorly.Are you guys saying you thought Stannis burning his daughter at the stake didn't have any value to the plot? It's an act that is the defining moment of his character?
Sorry, non book reader so forgive me. Through my eyes it makes perfect sense for his story arch in the timing it takes place. He is unilaterally moving towards what he thinks is his birth right giving away more and more of himself in the process and becoming increasingly pigeonholed into a death march. He's clearly a desperate man who just sold what's left of his soul. The act like many in the series is upsetting, but it didn't seem forced to me or violence for violence's sake. What alternative means is there to underscore what happens when a man chases power he believes is his divine right in a world where power is fickle and granted by the masses?It's gratuitous in its placement. It was a weak build and was thrown on Ep 9 just to shock the out of you. It certainly defines his (lack of ) character but like many other things in this VERY uneven season (Dorne, Faith militant etc...) it was plotted out poorly.
@Penfield I'm with you on Martin finishing that darn book. If it's not done, there's a good shot I don't watch next season until tWoW is published, not to mention the 7th (and presumed last) season versus A Dream of Spring (could the delay be that he's writing them concurrently? Ain't that wishful thinking!), which would in theory spoil the ending of the series.
It's gratuitous in its placement. It was a weak build and was thrown on Ep 9 just to shock the out of you. It certainly defines his (lack of ) character but like many other things in this VERY uneven season (Dorne, Faith militant etc...) it was plotted out poorly.
I may be forgetting my reading, but weren't Stannis's wife, daughter, and the Red woman cooling at Castle Black at the end of ADWD while Stannis was getting ready to attack Winterfell?
Here is how it went. Stannis wife on the show was always portrayed as the imbalanced one in favor of torching Shireen.They hinted at it earlier in the season, then hinted much more strongly at it later, then went through with it. In a 10-episode season, how did you want them to build it?
yup,I may be forgetting my reading, but weren't Stannis's wife, daughter, and the Red woman cooling at Castle Black at the end of ADWD while Stannis was getting ready to attack Winterfell?
Well I imagine the viewers are supposed to infer his internal struggle over time. This wasn't an overnight decision; that first scene about him saving her set that premise that it would be a monumental decision for him to make, not that he wouldn't go there. I personally don't need scenes of him in his chambers alone debating the pros and cons. The idea of sacrificing his daughter was actually a kind of Chekhov's gun. We already knew Stannis was far from perfect, so while I appreciated his anecdote about saving her, it didn't convince me he wouldn't sacrifice her if it meant he would get the Iron Throne. We saw the option made available, him initially reject it, and then see setback after setback and the desperation grow greater. You know it was in the back of his mind the entire time. Ramsay didn't just burn "some stuff." It didn't shock me for one second that Stannis went where he went when pushed to the desperation he is evidently being pushed to.All of a sudden Stannis is in favor and his wife is not? At what prompting? Some barely shown tough times getting to Winterfell? They showed NO internal struggle to getting to that extreme point of desperation. What Ramsay burned some stuff, so now all of a sudden it goes from "Melisandre you will never touch Shireen" to "OK we have to make a sacrifice of my daughter" . How did he get there? That is a MAJOR swing. It was even more hastily thrown together than the Faith Militant. It was opportunistic TV writing at its finest.
Don't bother. These discussions are rarely worth having with the book readers.Sorry, non book reader so forgive me. Through my eyes it makes perfect sense for his story arch in the timing it takes place. He is unilaterally moving towards what he thinks is his birth right giving away more and more of himself in the process and becoming increasingly pigeonholed into a death march. He's clearly a desperate man who just sold what's left of his soul. The act like many in the series is upsetting, but it didn't seem forced to me or violence for violence's sake. What alternative means is there to underscore what happens when a man chases power he believes is his divine right in a world where power is fickle and granted by the masses?
Agreed. Seemed way gratuitous, and just for extra shock value.By far the weakest penultimate episode in the series so far. "well we cut off Neds head, We had the red wedding, and we had the epic mountain/viper battle. How can we top that? " Tough bar to live up to though because the other 4 have been stupendous. They would have been better off flip flopping Hardhome episode with the Dances with Dragons episode if they were going to do it at all. While this hasn't happened in the books, and maybe it will, maybe it wont, I don't like the way it was done on the show. Although maybe it is just the father of a daughter in me talking. It takes a lot to disgust me. That disgusted me.
@Penfield I'm with you on Martin finishing that darn book. If it's not done, there's a good shot I don't watch next season until tWoW is published, not to mention the 7th (and presumed last) season versus A Dream of Spring (could the delay be that he's writing them concurrently? Ain't that wishful thinking!), which would in theory spoil the ending of the series.
I have no expectation of getting book 7 before season 7.