August_West said:
My feeling is (and its just an opinion) is that once you "take the throne" by force you have taken the throne and in the absence of being overthrown the line of succession is the way. So in my mind Stannis has a better claim than even Dany. Dany would not be given the throne back by claim. She would need to fight for it.
By the way I pretty much hate Brienne almost as much as I hate Sansa. So just know that I am coming from of place of irrationality and Im just trying to denigrate her and we will get along fine.
Her storyline ended when Arya left for Bravos. Just as Sansa's ended sitting around the Vale with Littlefinger. The show needed something for these characters to do so they winged it. Same with Jamie, who should laying siege in the Riverlands generally avoiding Cersei, and Bronn living a happy retirement not to be heard after Tyrion's trial by combat #2.
I'm cool with the Arya arc so far. Faithful to the books, but presented in a much richer narrative. The TV puffery enhanced the storyline rather than change or outright butcher it.
The Wall arc was also fairly well done. The only thing I didn't like was the sense that Sam was itching to get out of castle black. He was sent there deliberately with Aemon, Gilly, and Little Sam to become a maester, by Jon. Their journey takes up most of an entire book and they reduce it to Sam getting out while the gettin' is good? Bad form there.
The king's landing arc was a bit clumsy. Cersei creates sparrow army, sparrow army arrests Cersei for crimes we've known for years but nothing about the crimes since she reassumed power after Tywin's death, and Cersei gets her comeuppance. Lazy.
Dorne, we don't need to discuss further.
Dany as boring as it was until Tyrion shows up, it was still a lot more interesting than the books where it really dragged and we are still waiting for Tyrion and Jorah to show up inside the city.