You’re reaction proves my point in two ways.
Age does not account for optimum performance.
Why does stating something that is a fact and not meant as a defense elicit a negative reaction in you?
Occasionally I’m surprised by a poster’s response or who responds. For example I wasn’t expecting @Doctor Hoop’s reaction. I wasn’t shocked. But he doesn’t frequently post his upset in that manner.
On the other hand I would have been disappointed had you not responded in the manner you did. In a universe of uncertainty I derive comfort in the consistency of people not being able to overcome their bad habits. For CV it’s a turnover or taking a shot he shouldn’t. For you it’s getting upset about things you can’t control and being angry if you perceive someone is defending someone or something you dislike. Just for clarity this paragraph is sarcasm.
Impress me. Be the change you insist from others. Control your emotions. See if you can avoid being upset by bad play. Disassociate emotional reaction from an event. Most importantly recognize that expression of anger and wanting payback is different than setting standards. Challenge yourself the way you challenge Alterique or CV.
Not many of us can make this type of adjustment. And yet we insist that players in stressful conditions react differently.
Believe it or not I have to challenge myself everyday to avoid the pitfalls I’m recommending you avoid. I’m not above it. Very few people who have not shut down their emotions can avoid this struggle. However the situation is hopeless if we don’t perceive what we do is negative. As I’m fond of saying in this forum we can see the faults in others but are unable to see them in ourselves.
Well, look at the bright side - he has no where else to go but up! I'd bet that happens. He won't continue to shoot this badly the entire season.I expect a point guard who has been with the program for 4 seasons and is 22 years old to make better decisions than a freshman. Gilbert still overpenetrates and takes bad shots, resulting in him shooting 28% through 10 games this season. 28%. That is dismal by any objective standard. For comparison purposes, Taliek Brown (who was maligned by many over his alleged inability to shoot well) never shot below .417 from the floor in any of his 4 seasons at UConn. Adams is shooting 47% as a Soph and Bouknight is shooting 58% so far as a freshman. AG is shooting 28% in large part due to poor shot selection, not a lack of capability or talent.
Gilbert plays very good D and has the capability to be a very good player and leader. He needs to realize that his role is to facilitate and take GOOD shots within the flow of the offense. It's not a talent issue with Gilbert, it's a decision making issue, and after 4 years in the program many of us expect someone with a MCDonald's All-American pedigree to not make the same mistakes over and over, especially when he is your starting point guard and has a major impact on the team's success or lack of it.
I don't see myself as negative, I see myself as realistic. Even you would have to agree that this team would be MUCH better if Gilbert and Vital exercised better judgement in terms of shot selection. That's a fair and realistic point, not a negative one.
Just my opinion, but he seems mercurial. He's succeeded at the highest level before college and I suspect he will do the same here. Once he figures things out, his talent will be better displayed.
The original post you directed towards me is that my statement about experience was BS.I expect a point guard who has been with the program for 4 seasons and is 22 years old to make better decisions than a freshman. Gilbert still overpenetrates and takes bad shots, resulting in him shooting 28% through 10 games this season. 28%. That is dismal by any objective standard. For comparison purposes, Taliek Brown (who was maligned by many over his alleged inability to shoot well) never shot below .417 from the floor in any of his 4 seasons at UConn. Adams is shooting 47% as a Soph and Bouknight is shooting 58% so far as a freshman. AG is shooting 28% in large part due to poor shot selection, not a lack of capability or talent.
Gilbert plays very good D and has the capability to be a very good player and leader. He needs to realize that his role is to facilitate and take GOOD shots within the flow of the offense. It's not a talent issue with Gilbert, it's a decision making issue, and after 4 years in the program many of us expect someone with a MCDonald's All-American pedigree to not make the same mistakes over and over, especially when he is your starting point guard and has a major impact on the team's success or lack of it.
I don't see myself as negative, I see myself as realistic. Even you would have to agree that this team would be MUCH better if Gilbert and Vital exercised better judgement in terms of shot selection. That's a fair and realistic point, not a negative one.