Gabby Williams tattoo | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Gabby Williams tattoo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you think the staff avoids recruiting players with visible body art?
I doubt it. They recruit the player, the person, and the family - that is enough of a gauntlet. If am Augustus type player with Augustus style tattoos in HS came on the recruiting radar, I think they would be all over her. CD would figure something out.
 
It is a different world today. Body art has become body ART and not traditional tattoos. Below is a pic of one of our pastors in Denver. She 6'1" and rows crew and does power lifting and most importantly is a good theologian and pastor. She is, also, a published author. Her body art is largely the liturgical year told through stained glass window panes.

http://www.nadiabolzweber.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/nadia-frame5-229x300.png

And Nadia is also, in my opinion, an amazing role model.
 
Last edited:
It's a double standard; you don't see MBB players having to cover up their tattoos so women shouldn't have to, either.

It's a CD rule, not a WBB rule. It would only be a double standard if the same coach coached both teams and only allowed tattoos on the men. If you don't like it, don't play for UConn WBB. Has nothing to do with the men. Maybe someday a men's coach will come along and make that rule for his players, then you'll see them all in long sleeves playing basketball. Personally, I'd love to see less tattoos on some of the guys.
 
Geno likes them as people, and their talent is obvious, so I think Geno would recruit Seimone and Britney, despite lots of body art.
 
Geno likes them as people, and their talent is obvious, so I think Geno would recruit Seimone and Britney, despite lots of body art.
The question isn't whether he would have recruited them. The real question is whether he would've made them cover up such extensive scrawlings?
 
The question isn't whether he would have recruited them. The real question is whether he would've made them cover up such extensive scrawlings?
Maybe, but both had a lot fewer tats coming out of high school.
 
.-.
Tattoos do seem to wax and wane in popularity - the big difference in the last 30 years seems to be that they have become gender neutral - used to be a much higher percentage of men than women with any tats and more particularly with extensive tattooing.

I do think the more permanent nature of tattoos vs. body piercings creates more 'regret' through the years. And there is quite a vibrant business in tattoo removal that, as techniques have improved, has grown very profitable. What appeals to a 20 year old with a ripped body, can become less appealing on the expanding flesh of a 50 year old! And some matters that were vital in youth, become trivial in time.

And appearances do matter to us all - we make lots of snap judgements about people we meet based on visual cues - the longer the contact with a person gets, the less important those initial impressions become, but they are real. If you meet your new doctor and they have L O V E and H A T E tattooed on their fingers, you may change doctors pretty quickly regardless of the diplomas on the wall.

Personally, I have always thought regardless of gender, choosing body art in locations where the choice to display/conceal was an option depending on circumstance made a whole lot of sense - like any fashion/accessory being able to change the effect depending on the occasion seems sensible. But I guess for some people the art is so integral to their sense of identity that it becomes important to display it at all times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,366
Messages
4,568,066
Members
10,471
Latest member
EO2004


Top Bottom