Plus, she usually takes more shots per game.
She takes more because she can hit more than a layup or from 3 feet away : -)
Plus, she usually takes more shots per game.
She takes more because she can hit more than a layup or from 3 feet away : -)
Have you done the math on this? Gabby should have 18 more games this year. If she maintains her average of 8.7 rpg that's 157, which would give her 762. She would then need 238 in around 39 games. That's 6.1 rpg. Not saying that she'll do it, but it's certainly doable, even with more limited minutes and having to compete with Z and Batouly. Count me skeptical BTW that Batouly gets huge minutes next year. Geno likes a short rotation, and I expect the starters (and Gabby will be one) will still average more than 25 mpg. A good estimate IMO is that Gabby gets 15% fewer minutes and 10% to 15% fewer rebounds/minute. That would put her right around 1,000 if she stays healthy.The answer to your self imposed question is NO. Gabby, unfortunately, in the next year will be inhibited by two apparently top post players, limiting her time and rebound opportunities. This year shall be her most productive and most opportunities. Gabby was slowed by the golden 3, Tuck, Stew, Moriah--had this year to really show what a top talent she truly is--and next year with; what! 15 players--something has to give--and that will be game minutes. A darn shame, but it is what it is--Geno is overwhelmed with and abundance of talent --NEXT YEAR.
You arithmetic looks good. It is predicated on, not so much this year as next year. I was concentrating on both this and next year--(we each made assumptions--) mine was based on the 15 players to be in the schedule--admittedly 6 may not be in the rotation--never the less she, Gabby, will be competing with Batouly, probably Walker, Collier for time--.Have you done the math on this? Gabby should have 18 more games this year. If she maintains her average of 8.7 rpg that's 157, which would give her 762. She would then need 238 in around 39 games. That's 6.1 rpg. Not saying that she'll do it, but it's certainly doable, even with more limited minutes and having to compete with Z and Batouly. Count me skeptical BTW that Batouly gets huge minutes next year. Geno likes a short rotation, and I expect the starters (and Gabby will be one) will still average more than 25 mpg. A good estimate IMO is that Gabby gets 15% fewer minutes and 10% to 15% fewer rebounds/minute. That would put her right around 1,000 if she stays healthy.
Seemed like your 'concern' i.e. that Lou was looking for more points lately was pretty spot on!
Have you done the math on this? Gabby should have 18 more games this year. If she maintains her average of 8.7 rpg that's 157, which would give her 762. She would then need 238 in around 39 games. That's 6.1 rpg. Not saying that she'll do it, but it's certainly doable, even with more limited minutes and having to compete with Z and Batouly. Count me skeptical BTW that Batouly gets huge minutes next year. Geno likes a short rotation, and I expect the starters (and Gabby will be one) will still average more than 25 mpg. A good estimate IMO is that Gabby gets 15% fewer minutes and 10% to 15% fewer rebounds/minute. That would put her right around 1,000 if she stays healthy.
Not many since DT were conspicuous in many phases of the game. Katie Lou is just following the trend (or Christine). Can we call her the inconspicuous assassin?What was Geno's phrase last night: "Lou inconspicuously (or "quietly") doing her thing...."
Agreed.... I just want Lou out of her funk...Looks like gabby will get her 1000th point tonight as she sits at 988 and lou is at 944.
I am going to be odd person out here and take Gabby by a game. The reason why is that I think it's easier for Gabby to over exceed her scoring average than Lou exceed hers. The only concern with the pick is that Lou seems more determined of late to score and I can see her having 30+ pt game(s) if she gets hot.... Otherwise it will be hard to get much over 20pts when she will likely be playing only 3 quarters during conference play.