That is not what I am saying. To be clear, I am a supporter of all of UConn athletics (I make sure a portion of my annual donation gets directly to the baseball program and was a football season-ticket holder for several years in addition to hoops) and want nothing more than for the football team to succeed.He doesn't.
Personally I liked the email (but I've been
a football season ticket holder from the day they opened the Rent and I don't view football as a detriment to the basketball program) but my interpretation of KT's knocking the email was that the audience it was sent to included some UConn fans who would prefer to see the program fail.
My apologies if I misinterpreted.
This is it right here. I dont think any current season ticket holder is worried about not being able to get seats. It's more about, if you LOVE your "forever seats" you should have the opportunity to purchase seats as close to where you sit now. I am all for the renovations and there's no way around people getting displaced, just hope it's minimal. Can't wait to see what the plan is - I think they said we will hear about the process by the end of this year.Admittedly the wording of "purchase seats" vs "purchase as similar seats" isn't a good omen,
x 100It's more about, if you LOVE your "forever seats" you should have the opportunity to purchase seats as close to where you sit now.
Exactly. I understand what is going on and why this is happening. I never have problems with change or opportunity to improve revenue or image. For example, when attendance was poor and I was still getting season tickets. I never complain when they suddenly offered cheap seats in order to improve the attendance. I wanted this season tickets because I enjoy basketball and I like to know where I’m sitting. However, I would draw the line at moving to the upper level.This is it right here. I dont think any current season ticket holder is worried about not being able to get seats. It's more about, if you LOVE your "forever seats" you should have the opportunity to purchase seats as close to where you sit now. I am all for the renovations and there's no way around people getting displaced, just hope it's minimal. Can't wait to see what the plan is - I think they said we will hear about the process by the end of this year.
Not just that, it says "We will do our best to make sure every single season ticket holder will have the opportunity to purchase seats." To me, that says "no guarentees".Admittedly the wording of "purchase seats" vs "purchase as simlar seats" isn't a good omen,
Well, then those seats obviously won’t sell.Single game pricing is absurd lol. $187 a ticket to St. John's for upper deck at Gampel, 3 rows from the top around the free throw line?
Not just that, it says "We will do our best to make sure every single season ticket holder will have the opportunity to purchase seats." To me, that says "no guarentees".
I can’t see why they would when the price for the same seats are $50 cheaper on StubHub & Seatgeek.Well, then those seats obviously won’t sell.
Right?
I don't think the capacity will be reduced by much. The question is how many of the seats will be "premium", how much will they cost, and will enough existing season ticket holders pay up for them?So we really think the capacity is going down for Gampel by that much?
They will eventually sell as it gets closer to the game date.I can’t see why they would when the price for the same seats are $50 cheaper on StubHub & Seatgeek.
They will eventually sell as it gets closer to the game date.
To be fair, season ticket holders in that section pay an average of $100 per ticket ($800 for the 8 games). Compare that to football where chairbacks run about $100 per game for season ticket holders but you can buy the same seats at Costco for $25.
just wait until there's a mediocre season (ie. don't win a national championship) and the bandwagon will start exiting stage left and prices will filter down.Single game pricing is absurd lol. $187 a ticket to St. John's for upper deck at Gampel, 3 rows from the top around the free throw line?
So you think they are going through this trouble/change not to raise prices for a comprarable seat?No doubt the communication is poor and I'm definitely not arguing that this is a good thing or anything, I'm just not that surprised. I agree that announcing a mandatory reseating with no information about whether the venue will be adding/losing seats seems bad.
I personally thought the pricing changes in spring 2022 were far more egregious than this. My season tickets (2x at Gampel, 2x at XL) were $436.90 for 2021-22 including donation, and the following year, the same tickets were $1420. As long as they aren't taking people's seats and doing a humongous price hike at the same time, it's hard to envision this being worse for the average season ticket holder than that was.
It's a naked money grab, long time loyalty be damned.If they cared about current ticket holders at all they wouldn’t be allowing people to buy points to move up the list between now and announcing/executing whatever the unknown plan is. There’s no reason they couldn’t slot people into the same, comparable or best available seats, either allowing you to confirm you’ll keep at the new price, choose an open spot or simply decline. His initials are DB for a reason.
all three options are in play for many of us.I wonder where I'll be watching Eric Reibe from? Similar seats? Worse seats? My couch?
You didn't get the email? Some of your family members have more priority points so they get the couch now - you get the stool in the corner.I wonder where I'll be watching Eric Reibe from? Similar seats? Worse seats? My couch?