- Joined
- Jun 27, 2012
- Messages
- 741
- Reaction Score
- 4,055
Field looks unreal. via @JoeDSports on twitter
Field looks unreal. via @JoeDSports on twitter
View attachment 3570
I think at the 50 makes sense since each half is a mirror image. And the 20-30 is because of the logos. I think it would look more odd with half the logo on dark vs. light blades of grass -- and maybe your OCD would have more of a problem with that?Is it standard not to alternate the cut of grass between the 20 and 30, and between the 45s? I'm not sure my OCD can handle it.
Is it standard not to alternate the cut of grass between the 20 and 30, and between the 45s? I'm not sure my OCD can handle it.
Yah. I think I need to just accept this and move on.I think at the 50 makes sense since each half is a mirror image. And the 20-30 is because of the logos. I think it would look more odd with half the logo on dark vs. light blades of grass -- and maybe your OCD would have more of a problem with that?
What would be more impressive is 1.) More blue chair back seats, particularly in the bowl (adjust the price so that you can fill more seats even if they are somewhat less expensive) and 2.) Permanent seats at the scoreboard end to force people to spend less time standing there and more time in their seats. Let's not encourage people to congregate at that concourse.Impressive.
Thanks for the logical explanation.Rent won't because all that paint in the endzone would kill the grass within 2 or 3 games
Rent won't because all that paint in the endzone would kill the grass within 2 or 3 games
And make the temp. seating for the Michigan game permanent for the rest of the season.It's beautiful... we just need a matching one above the student section now... I'm always wanting more more, more. haha
Then another 15,000 seat upper deck.
And make the temp. seating for the Michigan game permanent for the rest of the season.