February General CBB Discussion Thread | Page 65 | The Boneyard

February General CBB Discussion Thread

Like you said in one of your posts, Joshua Jefferson is the former St. Mary's player UConn should have gotten. Having said that I am watching Aidan Mahaney on ESPNU and he looks like when he played at St. Mary's. He is the leading scorer so far in this game. It's UCSB vs Hawaii.
Mahaney is a fine player when he's not going up against good athletes. He's actually having a nice year for UCSB, shooting 40% from 3.
 
Ok so 1 seed in the South is the goal. Ideally without Houston as the 2/3. I think that means we need ISU or KU to get the 2 seed since they’re also in the Big12 and Houston would have to go elsewhere.

So we want ISU to lose to BYU and KU to beat Houston next week, and for Houston ti keep losing.
 
Last edited:
Ok so 1 seed in the South is the goal. Ideally without Houston as the 2/3. I think that means we need ISU or KU to get the 2 seed since they’re also in the Big12 and Houston would have to go elsewhere.

So we want ISU to lose to BYU and KU to beat Houston next week, and for Houston ti keep losing.
Honestly the Iowa State 1 seed, UConn 2 seed in the South draw was pretty sweet.

That is unlikely to happen if it's UConn 1 seed, unless Iowa State finishes ahead of Houston on the 2-line but behind someone like Purdue or Illinois.
 
.-.
Honestly the Iowa State 1 seed, UConn 2 seed in the South draw was pretty sweet.

That is unlikely to happen if it's UConn 1 seed, unless Iowa State finishes ahead of Houston on the 2-line but behind someone like Purdue or Illinois.
Why can’t it look like this:

East
1 Duke
8 Purdue

Midwest
2 Michigan
7 Houston

West
3 Zona
6 Illinois

South
4 UConn
5 ISU
 
Why can’t it look like this:

East
1 Duke
8 Purdue

Midwest
2 Michigan
7 Houston

West
3 Zona
6 Illinois

South
4 UConn
5 ISU
ISU is about 500 miles closer to Chicago, so would be placed in Midwest as the top 2 seed if Michigan isn't the #1 overall.
 
ISU is about 500 miles closer to Chicago, so would be placed in Midwest as the top 2 seed if Michigan isn't the #1 overall.
If I were ISU I’d rather play the #4 overall than the #2 overall who would have homecourt. Plus Iowa is closer to Houston than we are. Why would it matter if Michigan is 1 overall versus 2 overall?
 
.-.
If I were ISU wouldn’t you rather play the #4 overall than the #2 overall who would have homecourt?
They don't get a choice, it's just a procedure thing. Only the #1 overall gets to pick their pod/region. Less travel is generally better for teams, and the NCAA sells a lot more tickets by minimizing travel distance overall.
 
UCSB and Hawaii in a good game. There's a good loud crowd. I guess everyone got their surfing and beach fun in before the game.
 
Why can’t it look like this:

East
1 Duke
8 Purdue

Midwest
2 Michigan
7 Houston

West
3 Zona
6 Illinois

South
4 UConn
5 ISU
Call me crazy but I see an all chalk final four here with two rematches, Zona vs UConn, Duke vs Michigan.
 
Santa Barbara 66 vs Hawaii 66 . Sb has ball with 39 seconds left.

Later Edit: UCSB 68 Hawaii 66 on UCSB on offensive rebound put back but there's 8 seconds left with Hawaii timeout.

Later Edit: Hawaii ties game with put back and Aidan misses half court shot that just barely misses at the buzzer. Game is going into OT.
 
Call me crazy but I see an all chalk final four here with two rematches, Zona vs UConn, Duke vs Michigan.
I tried to lay it out strictly according to potential S curve but we’d be on dukes side of the bracket
 
.-.
They don't get a choice, it's just a procedure thing. Only the #1 overall gets to pick their pod/region. Less travel is generally better for teams, and the NCAA sells a lot more tickets by minimizing travel distance overall.
According to those parameters shouldn’t we have been the 2 seed in the east this morning?
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,204
Messages
4,513,309
Members
10,390
Latest member
Emoney2737


Top Bottom