- Joined
- Dec 1, 2023
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction Score
- 976
Perception is that BYU has not led at the half this year, until tonight?Houston loss. Check.
Illinois loss. Check.
Iowa State? Tbd. Currently losing.
Perception is that BYU has not led at the half this year, until tonight?Houston loss. Check.
Illinois loss. Check.
Iowa State? Tbd. Currently losing.
Mahaney is a fine player when he's not going up against good athletes. He's actually having a nice year for UCSB, shooting 40% from 3.Like you said in one of your posts, Joshua Jefferson is the former St. Mary's player UConn should have gotten. Having said that I am watching Aidan Mahaney on ESPNU and he looks like when he played at St. Mary's. He is the leading scorer so far in this game. It's UCSB vs Hawaii.
That pretty much means draped on him. Which you said was “fine”I didn't see the arms wrapped around him.
The RuffRuff jinxWell that sucked. Have to say that Michigan didn't look like a #1.
Honestly the Iowa State 1 seed, UConn 2 seed in the South draw was pretty sweet.Ok so 1 seed in the South is the goal. Ideally without Houston as the 2/3. I think that means we need ISU or KU to get the 2 seed since they’re also in the Big12 and Houston would have to go elsewhere.
So we want ISU to lose to BYU and KU to beat Houston next week, and for Houston ti keep losing.
I heard they were the best team ever assembled.Well that sucked. Have to say that Michigan didn't look like a #1.
Until they ran into the “elite” defense of DukeI heard they were the best team ever assembled.
Why can’t it look like this:Honestly the Iowa State 1 seed, UConn 2 seed in the South draw was pretty sweet.
That is unlikely to happen if it's UConn 1 seed, unless Iowa State finishes ahead of Houston on the 2-line but behind someone like Purdue or Illinois.
ISU is about 500 miles closer to Chicago, so would be placed in Midwest as the top 2 seed if Michigan isn't the #1 overall.Why can’t it look like this:
East
1 Duke
8 Purdue
Midwest
2 Michigan
7 Houston
West
3 Zona
6 Illinois
South
4 UConn
5 ISU
If I were ISU I’d rather play the #4 overall than the #2 overall who would have homecourt. Plus Iowa is closer to Houston than we are. Why would it matter if Michigan is 1 overall versus 2 overall?ISU is about 500 miles closer to Chicago, so would be placed in Midwest as the top 2 seed if Michigan isn't the #1 overall.
They don't get a choice, it's just a procedure thing. Only the #1 overall gets to pick their pod/region. Less travel is generally better for teams, and the NCAA sells a lot more tickets by minimizing travel distance overall.If I were ISU wouldn’t you rather play the #4 overall than the #2 overall who would have homecourt?
Call me crazy but I see an all chalk final four here with two rematches, Zona vs UConn, Duke vs Michigan.Why can’t it look like this:
East
1 Duke
8 Purdue
Midwest
2 Michigan
7 Houston
West
3 Zona
6 Illinois
South
4 UConn
5 ISU
I tried to lay it out strictly according to potential S curve but we’d be on dukes side of the bracketCall me crazy but I see an all chalk final four here with two rematches, Zona vs UConn, Duke vs Michigan.
I so wanted that shot to go in just for him.Mahaney nearly made a halfcourt buzzer beater to win it, tied going to OT
According to those parameters shouldn’t we have been the 2 seed in the east this morning?They don't get a choice, it's just a procedure thing. Only the #1 overall gets to pick their pod/region. Less travel is generally better for teams, and the NCAA sells a lot more tickets by minimizing travel distance overall.
Yes, but other stuff happened down the line.According to those parameters shouldn’t we have been the 2 seed in the east this morning?