February General CBB Discussion Thread | Page 56 | The Boneyard

February General CBB Discussion Thread

That is a good point. If that's the case, after a season like this, it makes me wonder how long Hurley is in this landscape. It's become pretty clear it was talent all along, not the system. Case in point Cam, Steph, Cling. You have three starting NBA players on one roster, they're going to look good in any system. Every year that goes by, the NIL/portal seem to solidify more and more in how top players move around.

You're just not going to overcome talent shortages when there are teams like UM rolling out NBA sized front courts.
It's going to be really hard to win if there is a major gap is funds. Even if that's 2-4mm.

This year has a weird smell to it. Hurley is fiery, but less so. Then you have a couple players who seem slightly apathetic.
Here comes the over the top drama.
 
What? Because Michigan has the best roster this season Hurley is going to retire from coaching.

It's always talent, nobody is winning national championships without great talent.
UM is just this year's example of what you can do with lot's of $$. If it's not them, it'll be BYU or another P4.

I think we here thought for awhile that our system was the secret sauce. Kelvin is complaining about $$, yet has three NC game returners and 3 top 25 freshmen. Can we even do that?


Eight will prove to be too thin a crowd for college basketball's $10 million club. Based on a variety of sources, schools believed to be operating in the realm of this golden tier are:
  • Arkansas
  • BYU
  • Duke
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Louisville
  • Michigan
  • North Carolina
  • St. John's
  • Texas Tech
These programs either have $10 million committed already or are easily capable of reaching that total in roster-building efforts by the end of this year's transfer cycle. They are 2025's whales of the portal, loading up on most of the priciest players and drastically inflating the market in the process.

You call it drama, I call it conversation via tea leaves. Let's see over the next few years how much the top 10 mirror this list.
 
Last edited:
UM is just this year's example of what you can do with lot's of $$. If it's not them, it'll be BYU or another P4.

I think we here thought for awhile that our system was the secret sauce. Kelvin is complaining about $$, yet has three NC game returners and 3 top 25 freshmen. Can we even do that?


Eight will prove to be too thin a crowd for college basketball's $10 million club. Based on a variety of sources, schools believed to be operating in the realm of this golden tier are:
  • Arkansas
  • BYU
  • Duke
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Louisville
  • Michigan
  • North Carolina
  • St. John's
  • Texas Tech
These programs either have $10 million committed already or are easily capable of reaching that total in roster-building efforts by the end of this year's transfer cycle. They are 2025's whales of the portal, loading up on most of the priciest players and drastically inflating the market in the process.

You call it drama, I call it conversation via tea leaves. Let's see over the next few years how much the top 10 mirror this list.
UConn is in this area.
 
UM is just this year's example of what you can do with lot's of $$. If it's not them, it'll be BYU or another P4.

I think we here thought for awhile that our system was the secret sauce. Kelvin is complaining about $$, yet has three NC game returners and 3 top 25 freshmen. Can we even do that?


Eight will prove to be too thin a crowd for college basketball's $10 million club. Based on a variety of sources, schools believed to be operating in the realm of this golden tier are:
  • Arkansas
  • BYU
  • Duke
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Louisville
  • Michigan
  • North Carolina
  • St. John's
  • Texas Tech
These programs either have $10 million committed already or are easily capable of reaching that total in roster-building efforts by the end of this year's transfer cycle. They are 2025's whales of the portal, loading up on most of the priciest players and drastically inflating the market in the process.

You call it drama, I call it conversation via tea leaves.
Only one of those teams is a serious contender to win it all (I consider them the favorites.) Most of them look like early exit material.

I'll let you in on a little secret, UConn was never paying as much as other schools and we won 6 championships in the past 25 seasons we were eleigible for the tournament. Twice as many championships as any other school.
 
Last edited:
.-.
That is a good point. If that's the case, after a season like this, it makes me wonder how long Hurley is in this landscape. It's become pretty clear it was talent all along, not the system. Case in point Cam, Steph, Cling. You have three starting NBA players on one roster, they're going to look good in any system. Every year that goes by, the NIL/portal seem to solidify more and more in how top players move around.

You're just not going to overcome talent shortages when there are teams like UM rolling out NBA sized front courts.
It's going to be really hard to win if there is a major gap is funds. Even if that's 2-4mm.

This year has a weird smell to it. Hurley is fiery, but less so. Then you have a couple players who seem slightly apathetic.

You take some strong and odd leaps sometimes…by sometimes I mean almost every post.
 
UM is just this year's example of what you can do with lot's of $$. If it's not them, it'll be BYU or another P4.

I think we here thought for awhile that our system was the secret sauce. Kelvin is complaining about $$, yet has three NC game returners and 3 top 25 freshmen. Can we even do that?


Eight will prove to be too thin a crowd for college basketball's $10 million club. Based on a variety of sources, schools believed to be operating in the realm of this golden tier are:
  • Arkansas
  • BYU
  • Duke
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Louisville
  • Michigan
  • North Carolina
  • St. John's
  • Texas Tech
These programs either have $10 million committed already or are easily capable of reaching that total in roster-building efforts by the end of this year's transfer cycle. They are 2025's whales of the portal, loading up on most of the priciest players and drastically inflating the market in the process.

You call it drama, I call it conversation via tea leaves. Let's see over the next few years how much the top 10 mirror this list.
Maybe you should go into hibernation for another 10 years because you think UConn won't be good again. Lol
 
Only one of those teams is a serious contender to win it all (I consider them the favorites.) Most of them look like early exit material.

I'll let you in on a little secret, UConn was never playing as much as other schools and we won 6 championships in the past 25 seasons we were eleigible for the tournament. Twice as many championships as any other school.
Yeah, historically no one can match us. On the go forward, I'm simply wondering how the money factor impacts our chances.

I'd say Duke is firmly in the mix. All generally to 20 schools. $$ correlation is definitely there.
 
Yeah, historically no one can match us. On the go forward, I'm simply wondering how the money factor impacts our chances.

I'd say Duke is firmly in the mix. All generally to 20 schools. $$ correlation is definitely there.
Money has always been a factor.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,171
Messages
4,511,055
Members
10,383
Latest member
Old South
Top Bottom