If nothing else it heightens interest to not announce. But on Monday anyone with access to the practice will know afterward.At least Mora acknowledged the somewhat absurdity of it.
To paraphrase he said not announcing it is a competitive advantage even though Utah St doesn't have film on any of them.
If nothing else it heightens interest to not announce. But on Monday anyone with access to the practice will know afterward.
Or so we hope.
So I guess there are2 ways to look at this situation. 1 is no quarterback has grabbed the job. 2 is we thought we had one solid quarterback but in fact we have 2.
Agree. I just would hate to see him lose confidence against a difficult opponent early in the year. Still, if he gives us the best chance of winning we should go with him.Not invalid but if Turner takes better care of the ball and throws less INTs then….
I see this as a nice problem we have not had in some time with joy.
What’s going to make him lose confidence? Just because you might lose confidence in the team is no reason to think Turner would.Agree. I just would hate to see him lose confidence against a difficult opponent early in the year. Still, if he gives us the best chance of winning we should go with him.
Oh, I don’t know… being chased all day by a superior opponent; getting sacked due to a new OL providing in adequate protection; being rushed into throwing interceptions do to lack of protection all come to mind. There are reasons why freshman quarterbacks aren’t preferred. UConn is still working its way back and it s first game with a new head coach, new offensive coach and multiple transfers is against a ranked opponent. That is a tough situation to throw a freshman quarterback into, especially for a team that was one of the worst in football the prior year.What’s going to make him lose confidence? Just because you might lose confidence in the team is no reason to think Turner would.
I meant to say there are 2 positive waysI am definitely falling in to the "guy who came in to camp as the #1 hasn't definitely separated himself from a true freshman, a transfer with almost no PT under his belt and a soph still rehabbing from an ACL" camp.
I meant to say there are 2 positive ways
I know we want to like that there are 4 good QBs and two solid, we think, choices for starting. However, this is the jaded UConn football fan in me, I have to think that this isn't a nice as we are spinning it. Clearly no one has solidified themselves as the front runner and made the coaches say "Yup, that's our guy". I get it might be close and schemes might be the same for TR and ZT, but relationships are what matter. How does the QB snap the ball with his count, how does he put touch on the ball, and all the little things that we probably don't even know about that come with knowing the QB and working with them constantly.
I want to believe that working with either QB all preseason will be fine for whoever takes the field against Utah St. However, I just have to wonder if naming a starting QB would be more beneficial than just saying we have a good group of QBs who are still competing with only 2 weeks before our first game.
“Chased all day by a superior opponent”, “getting sacked, by who? I was aware that Utah State’s defense gave up almost as many points as UConn did last year. Apparently you were not. Their defense sucks!!! They are terrible. You can take all that manufactured pessimism and stick it you know where. The kid is the real deal.Oh, I don’t know… being chased all day by a superior opponent; getting sacked due to a new OL providing in adequate protection; being rushed into throwing interceptions do to lack of protection all come to mind. There are reasons why freshman quarterbacks aren’t preferred. UConn is still working its way back and it s first game with a new head coach, new offensive coach and multiple transfers is against a ranked opponent. That is a tough situation to throw a freshman quarterback into, especially for a team that was one of the worst in football the prior year.
You weren’t aware of any of those things?
Agree. I just would hate to see him lose confidence against a difficult opponent early in the year. Still, if he gives us the best chance of winning we should go with him.
That is kind of what I think. We have our guy for 2023 Onward. But is he ready for the opener against a ranked team on the road or would it make more sense to let him hold the clipboard for a couple of games before putting him out there? It isn’t unheard of in the annals of college football, or even the NFL for that matter.Glass-half-ish-full...
Maybe we do have "that's our guy," but the apprehension is due to age/experience, and not "not being the guy?" To purely look at it from a coaching staff POV - throwing a true FR at QB is a pretty high-risk move, even more so in your first game in the regime, and on the road, to boot.
LOL, Utah State is receiving votes in the preseason polls. As things stand today they are considered a vastly superior opponent.“Chased all day by a superior opponent”, “getting sacked, by who? I was aware that Utah State’s defense gave up almost as many points as UConn did last year. Apparently you were not. Their defense sucks!!! They are terrible. You can take all that manufactured pessimism and stick it you know where. The kid is the real deal.
Totally agree, if he’s the guy. But, it’s a situation to put it true freshman.Well, then it’s on him and the coaches to not lose confidence. He doesn’t sound like a player that would wilt so easily.
Besides, we better be signing two QBs as good as him or better this year anyways.