- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 16,606
- Reaction Score
- 37,692
If our OOC schedule wasn't loaded, I might agree. But the strength of our OOC schedule, coupled with what should be a much improved AAC, should produce a two seed in this hypothetical. Not to mention, college basketball is going to be lacking at the top this year - one and two seeds will likely have more losses than usual.
The preseason tournament should yield at least two games against top 25/50 competition. Then, there is Maryland, Ohio State, Georgetown, and Texas. That right there gets you to six games against top comp (OSU seems like the one question mark). Win three of those, rack up 15 wins in conference play, and win the AAC tournament and you have yourself a 28-6 team with a pretty complete resume.
Say we beat Michigan, Syracuse, Maryland, and Ohio State. That still leaves us with losses to Texas, Georgetown, and, for the sake of argument, Gonzaga. Now say you split with SMU, Cincinnati, and Tulsa. You're at six losses, but you have roughly a dozen quality victories. That's a two seed.
I agree that the top of our OOC schedule is good, but the bottom is atrocious. We have 6 or 7 RPI 250+ games, and several 300+. Combined with the dregs of the AAC, it will be hard to get our own RPI into the top 10, arguably necessary for a 2 seed.
In 2014, 5-loss Louisville, AAC regular season and tournament champ, ranked #5 in the country, was relegated to a #4 seed. Their overall schedule that year won't be much different than ours this year.