Wish AG nothing but the best but the people who are heralding AG's play as our saving grace down the stretch rather than Bouk and Whaley's emergence are airing on the side of delusion. We started winning when Gaffney became the starting PG and AG was moved to the bench lets not forget.
Oh stop, those who are sticking up for AG are responding to comments like he couldn't play at this level or won't be missed, not saying that Alterique was Kemba or Bazz down the stretch.
And it's time to stop this narrative that we 'We started winning when Gaffney became the starting PG and AG was moved to the bench' to rest for good. Correlation does not equal causation was invented for situations like this.
Some of those closes losses when AG started are wins if Gaffney was a productive backup during that stretch instead of being borderline unplayable and some of those close wins when Gaffney started are Ls if we don't have AG coming in and playing well. Yet 'We started winning when Gaffney became the starting PG' gives Gaffney the credit for that and punishes AG for helping us win.
UConn played a much easier schedule down the stretch, had production from TWO point guards instead of just one, Bouknight and Whaley took huge steps forward as the season went. Hell, AG started the Houston game because of it being Senior Night and outplayed Gaffney by a sizable margin the last two times we saw these Huskies.