SubbaBub
Your stupidity is ruining my country.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,203
- Reaction Score
- 25,195
I think there is a difference between the PA announcer doing a live read for Lynch Toyota and having 2nd down sponsored by Moo Burger.There is literally nothing worse on the planet than the advertisements in stadium.
Anything where people are shaking their membership card to a grocery store or AAA is generally the worst.
Although there is a certain extra embarrassment at Rentschler when you win the Subway row you get a buy one get one free coupon.
Whatever the total cost of attending a game is - factoring tickets, parking, basic concessions... Even the opponent... Everything should be priced to facilitate a sellout, not to milk people for all they are worth. If you aren't selling out you are priced wrong.
While the Big 10s expansion is great for the network revenues...
App St
Miami Oh
Utah
Minnesota
Maryland
Indiana
Penn State
... that's brutally bad to sell tickets at what they charge.
To get a Penn State ticket you need to get a three game pack that includes Miami. Penn State is $95 and that puts you in the 94th row in the end zone. Miami is another $40 and I picked Utah which was $70.
The stadium experience also needs improve. Many stadiums do not show controversial replays. That is really cheating the fans in the stands. It make the stadium experience less than the home TV experience.
I think there is a difference between the PA announcer doing a live read for Lynch Toyota and having 2nd down sponsored by Moo Burger.
There is literally nothing else going on when that little man in the red shirt steps on the field.
The Subway row is 100% worthless to me, seeing as my fundamental aversion to Subway has been firmly in place since 2006.
Here's another excellent point. When I'm at a game, I wish I was at home watching whenever there is a close and controversial play being reviewed. I can think of several plays that have happened at the Rent where I have very literally said to my friends at the game "I wish I was at home so I can see what happened":
- G Davis "TD" grab in the endzone vs. Michigan
- J Baldwin's TD grab for Pitt in the back of the end zone (the famous J Todman 4th and 1 game)
- UNC's game-winning safety for a holding call against UCONN in their own end zone
- Temple's 2-pt conversion call
- Larry Taylor's fair catch
All these complaints about the advertisements etc, have some validity. But coupling them with complaints about being milked for money is odd.
Without them, we'd be paying more.
Yes if the plan is to maximize each year's revenue then yes. If the goal is to maximize revenue in the long run not necessarily.
Can you elaborate? I think I understand your thinking, but I want to be sure.