ShakyTheMohel
Is it 11:11 yet?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 8,832
- Reaction Score
- 20,905
I do think UConn could have patched together some sort of 5 or 6 game schedule. It would have been changing week to week...the players would have been going in and out of covid protocol..and of course no fans at the games.
Would that be worth it? I don't think so. If they were a decent senior-laden team...then maybe. In reality, they were a too young, physically underdeveloped bad team who needed to shed FCS players and develop the players remaining.
Generally...it's always worth playing real games. But... I think being independent, in a strict covid state, and with a young team under transition....not playing makes sense. Will they be better next year? Who knows...but I also don't know if they would have been better next year if they had played a short cobbled together schedule with a covid shortened roster.
Would that be worth it? I don't think so. If they were a decent senior-laden team...then maybe. In reality, they were a too young, physically underdeveloped bad team who needed to shed FCS players and develop the players remaining.
Generally...it's always worth playing real games. But... I think being independent, in a strict covid state, and with a young team under transition....not playing makes sense. Will they be better next year? Who knows...but I also don't know if they would have been better next year if they had played a short cobbled together schedule with a covid shortened roster.