Espn preseason UConn number 1 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Espn preseason UConn number 1

ochoopsfan said:
More waste from Mr. Creme.
Hundreds of players in the Portal with no idea who will wind up where.

Episode 7 Ugh GIF by Law & Order
Expand ...
This happens in every sport. Relax.
 
I don’t understand why people get so upset over this “too early ranking”. It’s an article. ESPN does it every year or at least the last several. It’s just a quick look into the next season. And Creme clearly states in the article that (a) it’s early and (b) transfers will alter standings as the off season continues.
 
HuskyFan1125 said:
I don’t understand why people get so upset over this “too early ranking”. It’s an article. ESPN does it every year or at least the last several. It’s just a quick look into the next season. And Creme clearly states in the article that (a) it’s early and (b) transfers will alter standings as the off season continues.
Expand ...

People have to b*tch about something.
 
Sluconn Husky said:
Actually, LSU's biggest luck came when Utah choked that game away against them.

I'm not sure I buy that SC had their "worst" game. They did what they do often: destroyed their opponent on the boards and shot poorly. They just lost a close game unlike their close wins against Stanford, UConn, Ole Miss, and UCLA.
Expand ...
I hear you but if Brea Beal has even an average game by her standards, SC wins. She probably had the worst game of her career against Iowa. Boston had a pretty subpar game too.
 
hoopsnloops32 said:
Duh. Assuming we stay healthy we should be number 1 going into next year. No one should have expected anything different given our proven roster let alone who we add. The biggest question will be health.
Expand ...
For me the biggest question is Paige. I want to see the confident, “ I am unstoppable Paige“ we saw her freshman season. Just imagine unstoppable Paige and Caitlin going at it in the NC game, that would be something to see. I hope it happens!
 
.-.
Tom677777 said:
I wonder how South Carolina will look with Boston, cooke, Beal, and amihere leaving
Expand ...
Cooke, Beal and Amihere have not posted anywhere that they have declared yet, and their 48 hours was up last night at 11pm. They could have, but haven't announced yet either way.
 
Until portal entries and destinations are firmed up, player injuries are announced, and last minute foreign players sign on, it is ridiculous to place any value in this list. Be patient everyone. Missy’s podcast will be coming out in five or six months with a lot more credibility. :rolleyes:
 
I agree with the caveat. That being said, we do look pretty great next year. If we pick up one player like Lou but a post,,,,,,,
 
.-.
bovwa10 said:
I hear you but if Brea Beal has even an average game by her standards, SC wins. She probably had the worst game of her career against Iowa. Boston had a pretty subpar game too.
Expand ...
You can say that about, UConn, Indiana, Utah and VT, they all had a bad game. That's basketball, sometimes you have a bad day and win and sometimes you don't.
 
Kaizen said:
Brea, LA and Cook all have entered the 2023 WNBA mock draft.

Sports Betting Lines Online | Best Betting Scores and Odds - Lines.com

Lines.com is your primary source of live sports betting lines on NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, NCAA football & basketball.
www.lines.com www.lines.com
Expand ...
I don't see how this article proves that the players listed in it have declared for the draft. For example, it includes Elizabeth Kitley, who has announced that she will be returning to Virginia Tech next year.
 
JoePgh said:
I don't see how this article proves that the players listed in it have declared for the draft. For example, it includes Elizabeth Kitley, who has announced that she will be returning to Virginia Tech next year.
Expand ...
I just showed that their names are in the 2023 WNBA mock draft list. I don't need to prove it since I don't make their decisions..

I think Lines.com just puts all the possible names in their mock draft list no verification.
 
Last edited:
Tom677777 said:
I wonder how South Carolina will look with Boston, cooke, Beal, and amihere leaving
Expand ...
They recruit very good and have a solid nucleus coming back. Playing so many players this year might not have helped them this year but those players who played will have a seamless transition next season.
 
.-.
Rowdy831 said:
They recruit very good and have a solid nucleus coming back. Playing so many players this year might not have helped them this year but those players who played will have a seamless transition next season.
Expand ...
Johnson, Hall, and Cardoso will be starters for sure, assuming all the seniors leave. The other two starting spots are up for grabs imo. Maybe Fulwiley will grab the other guard spot, she’s a great offensive player. I could actually see them being a bit better offensively next year but they’re gonna be nowhere near as good defensively.
 
I think Stanford will be better next year. Jones didn't look like she really was enjoying BB this year and the team as a whole looked like they needed a full time leader. Brink should give them that and they have a ton of talent on the bench waiting to get their chance. Iowa will struggle next year and be lucky to be a top 10 team with out the people they are losing. The two playing the extra year are good players but not quick enough to defend the top athletes. LSU will be the team to beat in the south and I like UCONN up north.
 
hoopsnloops32 said:
What big names are in the portal?
Expand ...
The portal works for new coaches but if you are established I think it hurts your program more than it helps. As a coach you shouldn't need others to develop your players, nor should you want people who aren't loyal. I would be surprised if any big names land at other contenders for next season.
 
Rowdy831 said:
I think Stanford will be better next year. Jones didn't look like she really was enjoying BB this year and the team as a whole looked like they needed a full time leader. Brink should give them that and they have a ton of talent on the bench waiting to get their chance. Iowa will struggle next year and be lucky to be a top 10 team with out the people they are losing. The two playing the extra year are good players but not quick enough to defend the top athletes. LSU will be the team to beat in the south and I like UCONN up north.
Expand ...
I agree that Stanford will be better without Jones next year as long as other people get better/step up. They have A LOT of talent on their roster that they never got to mesh together. I think having one clear leader and style of play will help them develop better chemistry and hopefully more solid rotations.
 
Rowdy831 said:
I think Stanford will be better next year. Jones didn't look like she really was enjoying BB this year and the team as a whole looked like they needed a full time leader. Brink should give them that and they have a ton of talent on the bench waiting to get their chance. Iowa will struggle next year and be lucky to be a top 10 team with out the people they are losing. The two playing the extra year are good players but not quick enough to defend the top athletes. LSU will be the team to beat in the south and I like UCONN up north.
Expand ...
I’m intrigued to see how Stanford does as well. I think the loss of Jones will be more impactful than you think, however. She was their primary ball-handler, second-best rebounder, and the only one on the team who could create her own shot. I don’t see anyone else on their roster who can create their own shot at the moment. I think they may start out slow next year but start to look like a top team towards the end of the season.
 
bovwa10 said:
Johnson, Hall, and Cardoso will be starters for sure, assuming all the seniors leave. The other two starting spots are up for grabs imo. Maybe Fulwiley will grab the other guard spot, she’s a great offensive player. I could actually see them being a bit better offensively next year but they’re gonna be nowhere near as good defensively.
Expand ...
South Carolina's offensive woes this year were more of the visual variety. Because of their offensive rebounding efficiency and Boston's low post play they were a very efficient offensive team that was pretty high score. They ended most poessessions with a basket they just needed 2-3 chances on each possession to do so. Next year I imagine they will be more dynamic offensively but not necessarily more efficient or consistent on that end of the ball. I don't imagine they'll be stopped by a team playing defense like Iowa did next year but on the flip side, most teams won't have to play defense against them that way with Boston and Saxton gone. Cardosa remains a threat down low but is easier to guard as she doesn't yet have the skill set of a Boston or a Brink around the basket or from the free throw line extended.
 
.-.
Carnac said:
Good time Charlie didn’t waste any time to reveal his not-too-early top 25 preseason rankings for next season. I’m pleased to see UConn back at number one where they belong. Now I’d like to see them live up to it. Charlie’s list gets our spring and summer off to a good start. Only 7 more months until the season starts back up. :)
Expand ...
Ha!
 
cferraro04 said:
I believe Saxton is also a senior...but, both Amihere and Saxton have one more year of eligibility (COVID Year).
Expand ...
No, Saxon has used all five years. Fletcher has used all five.

Boston has announced wnba.

Zia seemed to want to go pro as did Beal. But there has been no public announcement.

Amihere has been totally quiet
 
visitingcock said:
No, Saxon has used all five years. Fletcher has used all five.

Boston has announced wnba.

Zia seemed to want to go pro as did Beal. But there has been no public announcement.

Amihere has been totally quiet
Expand ...
I may be wrong but going quiet more likely means they’re leaving imo
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,205
Messages
4,556,830
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom