Entering the portal - 2026 | Page 52 | The Boneyard

Entering the portal - 2026

If this is at all still true, only means one thing. Khamenia didn't come to play the 4. If Duke is in on him too, looks like Scheyer is moving away from the freshman concept entirely this year and they will all be riding pine and likely in the portal next year.


Slow down...

 
If this is at all still true, only means one thing. Khamenia didn't come to play the 4. If Duke is in on him too, looks like Scheyer is moving away from the freshman concept entirely this year and they will all be riding pine and likely in the portal next year.


You are just a flaming take machine, aren't you?
source.gif
 
It's definitely interesting, I'm just not sure I agree with the idea of the transfer up being the issue. Like if Damian Lillard or Steph Curry or Paul George transferred up in college is the idea they wouldn't have become stars?

My opinion is it was more of a shift that top teams just got better at identifying talent, so less guys were starting at a lower level. I think we'll start to see more examples of transfers up having better NBA careers as more of the 4 star recruits are moving down a level to play freshman year and then can transfer up.
That’s exactly the idea. In Steph’s case, we have his brother as an example of what could’ve happened who went from averaging 20 a game at Liberty his freshman year to never looking like that caliber of player at Duke.

I’m interested to see how Yaxel does and for more information on this to come out.

If a guy has 3-4 years to get better and develop their game for the NBA, I just don’t see how spending a year regressing/plateauing trying to fit into a new team is the best way to maximize their talent.
 
If this is at all still true, only means one thing. Khamenia didn't come to play the 4. If Duke is in on him too, looks like Scheyer is moving away from the freshman concept entirely this year and they will all be riding pine and likely in the portal next year.


I would love to get a PF with size and strength to go with good shooing instead of playing small ball with even smaller lineup than last year potentially.
 
That’s exactly the idea. In Steph’s case, we have his brother as an example of what could’ve happened who went from averaging 20 a game at Liberty his freshman year to never looking like that caliber of player at Duke.

I’m interested to see how Yaxel does and for more information on this to come out.

If a guy has 3-4 years to get better and develop their game for the NBA, I just don’t see how spending a year regressing/plateauing trying to fit into a new team is the best way to maximize their talent.
I'm trying to understand the point - help me there.
I would love to get a real PF instead of playing small ball with even smaller lineup than last year potentially.
Let's see how this plays out.
You are just a flaming take machine, aren't you?
source.gif
I find enjoyment in keeping mind open to the possibilities.
 
.-.
That’s exactly the idea. In Steph’s case, we have his brother as an example of what could’ve happened who went from averaging 20 a game at Liberty his freshman year to never looking like that caliber of player at Duke.

I’m interested to see how Yaxel does and for more information on this to come out.

If a guy has 3-4 years to get better and develop their game for the NBA, I just don’t see how spending a year regressing/plateauing trying to fit into a new team is the best way to maximize their talent.
Seth Curry was first team all-ACC at Duke and second team all-American at Duke.
 
That’s exactly the idea. In Steph’s case, we have his brother as an example of what could’ve happened who went from averaging 20 a game at Liberty his freshman year to never looking like that caliber of player at Duke.

I’m interested to see how Yaxel does and for more information on this to come out.

If a guy has 3-4 years to get better and develop their game for the NBA, I just don’t see how spending a year regressing/plateauing trying to fit into a new team is the best way to maximize their talent.
There's really no way to know this, but I think the reason Seth didn't look as good at Duke as at Liberty is he wasn't as good as Steph. We have the ability of hindsight here but I think you could have put Steph on any team in the country and he'd have done the same thing.

I guess my larger point is at some point you'll have to face the improved competition whether it's P5 or the NBA. Not going to dismiss the idea that moving up can stunt development for some guys, I just think that if you're a star like we're looking for in this conversation it'll show up regardless.

It's a fun conversation, I don't think either of us are definitively right or wrong.
 
Issue is your view is always back dated 5-6 years. Go look at this years mock first, and second. Last years draft. Tell me how many mid majors are in there. Last year had Rasheer Flemming, that's it. This year will have zero. All semi decent MM players portal up.

Game has changed dramatically. I've never met someone who's view is more deeply wrought in the past. It's a constant pattern of yours. If it's not PG development because of Calhoun days, it's thinking mid majors can develop NBA stars, completely oblivious to the fact those same players today are not staying at Santa Clara for 3 years because some HM is going to give them 2mm. Graves is a perfect example.

Need to catch up with the current, not even what happened in 2021. That research is dated.

Sick em Chopper…
 
Seth Curry was first team all-ACC at Duke and second team all-American at Duke.
Seth went from averaging 20.5 PPG at Liberty (Steph averaged 21.5 his first year at Davidson)

To 9 PPG at Duke in what should’ve been his junior year and finished averaging 17.5 PPG his 5th year.

You don’t think if he stayed at Liberty he could’ve been on Steph’s trajectory of developing as a star player on a team and eventually hitting that 25 PPG mark and being on draft boards more rather than going to fit in at Duke?

He wasted his sophomore-senior year (timeline wise because he was there till his 5th year) adjusting rather than growing on what was a great freshman year.
 
.-.
Seth went from averaging 20.5 PPG at Liberty (Steph averaged 21.5 his first year at Davidson)

To 9 PPG at Duke in what should’ve been his junior year and finished averaging 17.5 PPG his 5th year.

You don’t think if he stayed at Liberty he could’ve been on Steph’s trajectory of developing as a star player on a team and eventually hitting that 25 PPG mark and being on draft boards more rather than going to fit in at Duke?

He wasted his sophomore-senior year (timeline wise because he was there till his 5th year) adjusting rather than growing on what was a great freshman year.

No. He’s nowhere near as a good as his bro in any possible way.
 
There's really no way to know this, but I think the reason Seth didn't look as good at Duke as at Liberty is he wasn't as good as Steph. We have the ability of hindsight here but I think you could have put Steph on any team in the country and he'd have done the same thing.

I guess my larger point is at some point you'll have to face the improved competition whether it's P5 or the NBA. Not going to dismiss the idea that moving up can stunt development for some guys, I just think that if you're a star like we're looking for in this conversation it'll show up regardless.

It's a fun conversation, I don't think either of us are definitively right or wrong.
It does make you wonder at some point far down the line, if MM's end up being aligned minor league systems for the high major's. Let your freshman go to Campbell under a Duke contract for year one, under Duke NIL. They can then be called up, maybe even in season, if they're ready. Could make it more fun for both ends.

They simply can't compete anymore. These last two tournaments are plenty of proof.

There are 4 top 100 HS kids going to MM's, VCU, Memphis, Gonzaga & Dayton. I would guess that any decent MM player this year is in the portal and will be portaling up to a HM if good. Not sure what putting them on a playing field of programs with 15mm in NIL is.

To say Seth could have been as good as Steph if he had been developed properly at college is hysterical. Cream rises.
 
It does make you wonder at some point far down the line, if MM's end up being aligned minor league systems for the high major's. Let your freshman go to Campbell under a Duke contract for year one, under Duke NIL. They can then be called up, maybe even in season, if they're ready. Could make it more fun for both ends.

They simply can't compete anymore. These last two tournaments are plenty of proof.

There are 4 top 100 HS kids going to MM's, VCU, Memphis, Gonzaga & Dayton. I would guess that any decent MM player this year is in the portal and will be portaling up to a HM if good. Not sure what putting them on a playing field of programs with 15mm in NIL is.
I know we're far down the road to professionalization here, but I think we're a ways from getting called up to a different school midyear. These are still colleges. Is he going to switch math classes, too?
 
Seth went from averaging 20.5 PPG at Liberty (Steph averaged 21.5 his first year at Davidson)

To 9 PPG at Duke in what should’ve been his junior year and finished averaging 17.5 PPG his 5th year.

You don’t think if he stayed at Liberty he could’ve been on Steph’s trajectory of developing as a star player on a team and eventually hitting that 25 PPG mark and being on draft boards more rather than going to fit in at Duke?

He wasted his sophomore-senior year (timeline wise because he was there till his 5th year) adjusting rather than growing on what was a great freshman year.

He's not as good as his brother and never was going to be.
 
I'll take Miami


Look for Miami to be in the mix for ACC conference title- could make a final four push- definitely a program & coach on the rise!! Shelton Henderson might be the most underrated sophomore going into next season- total beast.
 
No. He’s nowhere near as a good as his bro in any possible way.
Great job of being dense enough to comment on something that wasn’t the point being made.

Let’s not be stupid about this and please be smart enough to understand what the actual point is.
 
.-.
Of course he wasn’t going to be Steph. Let’s not be ridiculous.

The point is he would’ve been better off developing as a star at Liberty who could’ve averaged 25 PPG as a junior instead of 9 PPG at Duke.

The point of course is not that he would’ve been Steph. Don’t be stupid. The point is he would’ve been much better off than transferring “up” to Duke.
 
The irony here is something that I'm sure will go lightyears above your head.
Don’t you have another player you want to tell the board about how good they are just to turn around and say they actually weren’t good enough to play here when they bust?

I don’t know why people take your opinions seriously anymore with your track record.
 
.-.
Great job of being dense enough to comment on something that wasn’t the point being made.

Let’s not be stupid about this and please be smart enough to understand what the actual point is.
What is the point? I'm not understanding. Is there something you think "should" be happening that isn't?
 
What is the point? I'm not understanding. Is there something you think "should" be happening that isn't?
Our American basketball system is shit. This transfer portal nonsense which results in what we see now is helping it become even shittier. This mid major transfer up thing is hampering careers and removing another American talent pipeline to the NBA by having these guys mess up their development trajectory chasing short term money and 15 minutes of fame.

I hate it.
The idea that an NBA executive charged with making hugely consequential decisions for the future of his franchise (and his own career) would reduce his analysis to "Kid A scored 25 a game at Liberty and Kid B scored only 9 ppg at Duke" is so facile and ridiculous it boggles the mind.
The usual mean girls clique is showing up like clock work with wrong assumptions on what’s being said.

Who the hell said this man?
 
Our American basketball system is shit. This transfer portal nonsense which results in what we see now is helping it become even shittier. This mid major transfer up thing is hampering careers and removing another American talent pipeline to the NBA by having these guys mess up their development trajectory chasing short term money and 15 minutes of fame.

I hate it.

The usual mean girls clique is showing up like clock work with wrong assumptions on what’s being said.

Who the hell said this man?
Hence all the europeans in the NBA. Yes, the US BB system is basically become private equity.

Don't really see how the portal is hampering development as the higher you go up, the better the coaching and competition. I'd say that trumps continuity with a MM program.
 
Last edited:
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,487
Messages
4,577,671
Members
10,487
Latest member
husky62


Top Bottom