Not quite, it means that Drummond and the Cavs would negotiate a settlement on the remaining money owed to him in his contract (which ends after this year). The expectation is that this would allow him to become a free agent and could then sign a new contract with the Nets.This is a dumb question... what does buyout mean? The Nets will just take over his contract?
I read this earlier this morning: Report: It's 'a matter of time' until Andre Drummond secures a buyout and joins the Brooklyn Netsany source for this? although lots of teams regularly buy out players (it's seen as a "favor" to big-time player agents) i have read that the cavs rarely do... i think the c's were waiting for them to buy out tristan thompson last year and they just let him walk.
Thanks. A bit uncommon for sure. Doesn't say much for the Cavs long term interest in Drummond. But I suppose he gets paid a decent amount and isn't exactly a proven winner.Not quite, it means that Drummond and the Cavs would negotiate a settlement on the remaining money owed to him in his contract (which ends after this year). The expectation is that this would allow him to become a free agent and could then sign a new contract with the Nets.
I want him on Dallas with Luka but he would also get a million alley oops from Harden, hope this happens for Andre.Well he would never see the ball on offense. Except offensive rebounds, of course.
He's making almost $29 million this year, so yeah pretty decent.Thanks. A bit uncommon for sure. Doesn't say much for the Cavs long term interest in Drummond. But I suppose he gets paid a decent amount and isn't exactly a proven winner.
He's got a family to feedHe's making almost $29 million this year, so yeah pretty decent.
What? What exactly is Drummond doing wrong? Your post makes no sense.LOL NBA is a joke now. Players doing what they want when they want rather tan playing out their contracts and waiting for free agency. Sorry this is ridiculous no matter ex-Husky or not. I mean I'm a Celts fan and even if he went there this is ridiculous.
it's more complicated than that. the cavs likely will NOT make the playoffs and have three options with drummond: (1) let him play out his contract on a losing team and then leave for nothing, (2) trade him for 25 cents on the dollar, (3) buy him out as a favor to his agent. lots of teams choose the third option willingly.LOL NBA is a joke now. Players doing what they want when they want rather tan playing out their contracts and waiting for free agency. Sorry this is ridiculous no matter ex-Husky or not. I mean I'm a Celts fan and even if he went there this is ridiculous.
His beef sounds like it's more with the NBA than Drummond in particular. It has kind of become a league of the have and have nots. Players buddy up on a select few teams and the rest of the teams will mostly struggle. I don't blame the players, but from a competitive balance standpoint it almost feels like in recent years, the small market teams can be a farm system for teams like the Lakers. It must stink to be a fan of some of those teams.What? What exactly is Drummond doing wrong? Your post makes no sense.
you are so so dumb. front offices can trade you at any time this is a two way street. fohLOL NBA is a joke now. Players doing what they want when they want rather tan playing out their contracts and waiting for free agency. Sorry this is ridiculous no matter ex-Husky or not. I mean I'm a Celts fan and even if he went there this is ridiculous.
the cavs are going for a "youth movement" thing right now and shouldn't pay drummond. whether or not he gets bought out, traded, or finishes his contract with the cavs, his best options next year are to: (a) take a huge discount to play for a contender, or (b) make a bunch of money playing for another subpar team who is trying to make the 8th seed (e.g. what players like bogdanovic and gallinari did with the hawks this year)Thanks. A bit uncommon for sure. Doesn't say much for the Cavs long term interest in Drummond. But I suppose he gets paid a decent amount and isn't exactly a proven winner.
But won’t they have to pay almost all of his contract? Can’t they dump the entire contract if they trade him?it's more complicated than that. the cavs likely will NOT make the playoffs and have three options with drummond: (1) let him play out his contract on a losing team and then leave for nothing, (2) trade him for 25 cents on the dollar, (3) buy him out as a favor to his agent. lots of teams choose the third option willingly.
And fewer than usual, because of all the 3s.Well he would never see the ball on offense. Except offensive rebounds, of course.
The Cavs have Jaret Allen now. They don’t want Drummond anymore but I agree they should at least be able to get something quality for him. If not, the more traditional style of (non-shooting) center getting paid a lot is officially going to be a thing of the past in the nba.Thanks. A bit uncommon for sure. Doesn't say much for the Cavs long term interest in Drummond. But I suppose he gets paid a decent amount and isn't exactly a proven winner.
they would almost definitely have to take back money in order to trade him. if they can get a couple of young, cheaper pieces (or draft picks) it would be worthwhile, but very few well-run teams will trade serious assets for an expiring player. the cavs might just prefer to have the cap space next year.But won’t they have to pay almost all of his contract? Can’t they dump the entire contract if they trade him?