- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,656
- Reaction Score
- 427,919
He’s also been a turnover machine.
Anyone figure out his snap to turnover ratio yet?
He’s also been a turnover machine.
It’s very unlikeky we win the UMass game.If UConn could start winning with the UMass game, and win five straight, it could qualify for a bowl game this year. I know it's a long-shot, but it would make up for the mess that the team currently is in.
It’s very unlikeky we win the UMass game.
It’s very unlikeky we win the UMass game.
Oline looked okay last night.I don’t understand why there is so much talk about who plays QB. It really doesn’t matter who is under center for this team. The OL is pourous and the receivers can’t get any separation.
Oh and we have guys who look like the have never played the game before at linebacker. Talent there is worse than when Edsall took over program when it was division 2
Think anyone will be there to see it?
I agree. I would like to see Pindell get his legs back like he had in the first two games. However, if we are 1-7 or 1-8 it wouldn’t be a bad idea to possibly let Washington and Krajewski rotate the last four games. MW has some playing time under his belt and has only one TD (first pass of his career) to six turnovers. SK has not touched the field yet but seems he should be able to handle his own. I say let the competition start early!Because the team is awful and built to be competitive sometime in the future. So why only play a QB who won’t be here in 2 months?
Do you think that maybe, just maybe, defenses have discovered that Pindell is a threat and are paying particular attention to him? He hasn't regressed, and he's hurt to boot, for God's sake!As good as Pindell has been, Washington is a far more talented athlete than Pindell. Washington is a much greater offensive threat IMO and his much better lateral movement makes it difficult for pass rushers to get their hands on him. All he needs is PT to gain some experience. Pindell has regressed, he's not the same player he was four or five games ago.
I can't blame the OP. This is truly the season of no joy.
If UConn could start winning with the UMass game, and win five straight, it could qualify for a bowl game this year. I know it's a long-shot, but it would make up for the mess that the team currently is in.
No I don't.Do you think that maybe, just maybe, defenses have discovered that Pindell is a threat and are paying particular attention to him? He hasn't regressed, and he's hurt to boot, for God's sake!
I like your enthusiasm, but it’s over Johnny. This team couldn’t beat Yale. I have to wonder if even Edsal’s recruits will develop into players.If UConn could start winning with the UMass game, and win five straight, it could qualify for a bowl game this year. I know it's a long-shot, but it would make up for the mess that the team currently is in.
You are what? 25 tops? Stop it.
We suck. It is worse than imagined. But the Buffs sucked ass just a short while ago too.
If it doesn't matter who is under center, then why not start Washington and get him more PT in preparation for the next two years? And let Pindell heal.I don’t understand why there is so much talk about who plays QB. It really doesn’t matter who is under center for this team. The OL is pourous and the receivers can’t get any separation.
Oh and we have guys who look like the have never played the game before at linebacker. Talent there is worse than when Edsall took over program when it was division 2
It is what it is. I am a bit sick of that expression but it certainly applies here.I went camping this past weekend off the grid. I wasn't exactly in a rush to check the score of our game when I got home this afternoon. I'm not sure how 55-14 can be better than what I was expecting to see, but alas, it was. That's a helpless and sad state for our program.
Pindell is playing fine. He isn’t the problem. But it’s obvious that this year is a joke so why play a guy who is gone? Start him...but get Washington and Krajewski time before there is 5 minutes left.
One way to look at it. But another is that if he is not good enough to not even cause negative repercussions, he's not gonna be good enough next year. Time to start shopping again.Because if your QB isn't good enough, you're not helping the rest of the offense play to their potential and grow.
It's not that hard folks. If he could play Washington without negative repurcussions to everyone else, he would.
One way to look at it. But another is that if he is not good enough to not even cause negative repercussions, he's not gonna be good enough next year. Time to start shopping again.