HuskyNan
You Know Who
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 26,043
- Reaction Score
- 215,218
I agree. You do know a little bit about Bball.I guess I know a little bit about Bball after all.
I agree. You do know a little bit about Bball.I guess I know a little bit about Bball after all.
Got it.
I unfortunately missed the game today, couldn't resist Les Troyens
I agree. You do know a little bit about Bball.
OK - choosing to play Stef in the post as a response to not having Stewie is certainly reasonable, although neither Marisa nor Geno mentioned that when talking about their desire to get Stef more active down low today. But your reply to the OP mentioned double teams, a sagging/packed-in defense and defensive ability as items that--because they weren't present today--resulted in GA choosing to keep Stef in the lane more than she has been lately. At least that seemed to be your implication.
It's just logical that when you have two posts and one is not playing the remaining post will have to play in the post more. Did they have to mention that to make it valid?
I believe (just my opinion) that Geno would play her in the post as much as he could if the defense made that the best option. I am sure the shooting percentage is better inside.
If the defense double-teams Stef, that's not usually going to cause a coach to respond by bringing her to the high post, is it?
No, it forces Dolson to pass it out of the post as she did against GTown.
Sal,I'm really not interested in your respect. My sarcasm is one of my better qualities.
I remember Perretta and I think that is one of the most ridiculous comparisons I've seen.
UConn looks for the first good shot in the 30 second clock. Villanova looks for the last good shot in the 30 second clock.
Sal,
Listen and learn and then you won't make such outlandish, uninformed statements that are not opinions but outlandish statements . Don't get mad get informed,
listen to doggydaddy
I'm sorry you feel that way on how I responded to Sal. And you used your first post to do it.Phil, your and Dogdaddy's hostile response seems unnecessary. Share your knowledge and opinions not your egos.
Well a couple things Sal. One, we didn't have Stewart this game, so yea, Dolson was always going to be in the low post more. It was kind of a given.As I have posted previously I felt that despite Stephie's passing ability she is a more valuable asset in the low post . So to all the nay Sayers and my detractors here is a Quote from Stephie herself and comments by coach.
“As Coach said we put an emphasis of getting the ball inside and our guards did a great job of delivering it to me and giving me good passes,” Dolson said. “I think we did a good job of getting the ball inside/out and having a good balance.”
Dolson finished with 20 points, most of them coming down low which opened up things for Kaleena Mosqueda-Lewis to hit four 3-pointers and score a game-high 24 points.
“We talked a lot about that the last couple of days,” Auriemma said. “We made it a point the last couple of days to get Stefanie the ball as much as possible. We did and I think that created a whole other set of problems with Marquette. I thought the ball movement was great that first 20 minutes. We got the exact shot we wanted to get most every time down the floor. It has been a while since we have come out with that kind of focus to start games and it was good to see.”
I guess I know a little bit about Bball after all.
Well a couple things Sal. One, we didn't have Stewart this game, so yea, Dolson was always going to be in the low post more. It was kind of a given.
Second IIRC, Dolson scored on 2-3 jumpshots (well, shots anyway) from the high post. And I distinctly remember Dolson scoring on a pick and roll from the high post and on a dive from the high post. Sooooo, although they did work the low post with her, and it did work nicely, and she did a great job down low......she scored about half her points from the high post and she was below her average in rebounds.
Don't get too full of yourself.
I hate reading the back and forth arguments on this site and din't want to start a new one. I tried to explain why the high/low can and will workI'm sorry you feel that way on how I responded to Sal. And you used your first post to do it.
I'm not sure why you didn't respond in kind to Sal, who I was replying to about Villanova. He started this thread to use what he thought was valid analysis on the Marquette game and Dolson playing the low post. And at the end of his post he said
"So to all the nay Sayers and my detractors * * * I guess I know a little bit about Bball after all."
Hostile? Ego driven? looks like it to me.
Well a couple things Sal. One, we didn't have Stewart this game, so yea, Dolson was always going to be in the low post more. It was kind of a given.
Second IIRC, Dolson scored on 2-3 jumpshots (well, shots anyway) from the high post. And I distinctly remember Dolson scoring on a pick and roll from the high post and on a dive from the high post. Sooooo, although they did work the low post with her, and it did work nicely, and she did a great job down low......she scored about half her points from the high post and she was below her average in rebounds.
Don't get too full of yourself.