I’m perplexed how UConn could be off the #1 seed line based on results with a loss to #3 and a loss to #8 while ND has lost to UConn and an unrankes team and UConn. I don’t think by the eye test that UConn deserves a #1 seed unless they can consistently play like they did at ND, but based on records and results, I don’t see how they could be moved? It likely won’t matter anyway. Let’s be any seed and play the underdog for once and prove they deserve the legacy they’ve grown....
A team's résumé is defined primarily by wins, not losses. The committee has consistently shown that a quality win helps a team more than an unexpected loss hurts it.
Notre Dame has 5 RPI top 25 wins (RPI ranking in parentheses):
Louisville (3), Marquette (10), Iowa (11), Gonzaga (13), Drake (15)
(Notre Dame also has a high-quality win over Oregon State, whom the committee will regard more highly than their current #37 RPI ranking would suggest.)
Compared to 3 RPI top 25 wins for UConn:
ND (1), UCF (16), Cal (22)
People are making way too much of ND's loss to an "unranked" team—at least in terms of its impact on seeding. The committee can and will be very cognizant of the fact that ND was missing a key starter for that game, provided that Jackie Young returns to the team and is available for the postseason.