LETTERL
Pack Leader
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2014
- Messages
- 3,985
- Reaction Score
- 6,415
That is such a bad look for the NCAA. I mean, they had MONTHS to prepare for this. Completely unacceptable.
Well, Vegas is where the Pac-12 women's and men's tournament was played....women played at Michelob Ultra Arena, formerly known as Mandalay Bay Events Center and the men played at the T-Mobile Arena. I can assume both the women's and men's teams had really good food then??If they had chosen Las Vegas, they could have had the food service done by a hotel buffet, which 99.9% have better food then most college facilities. Many of the weight rooms would be like a private gym. All 64 teams and staff could have been housed in one or two of the closed hotels on the Strip.
.Title IX isn’t about sports. It’s a law that requires equality of the genders in publicly funded institutions.
Title IX - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Ooops. I should have read ALL the posts in the thread before posting. Joni Taylor's statement puts a different spin on things, for sure.That is such a bad look for the NCAA. I mean, they had MONTHS to prepare for this. Completely unacceptable.
Do you think the same phrase was in the men’s tournament book?Ooops. I should have read ALL the posts in the thread before posting. Joni Taylor's statement puts a different spin on things, for sure.
This year 5 separate conferences had their women's and men's tournaments here in Vegas. The Big West, Mountain West, Pac-12, West Coast, and Western Athletic Conferences. The Big West was added this year due to the restrictions in California, but the other 4 have been here ranging from 4 to 10 years. The kids love Vegas, maybe not as much this year because of COVID. A friend of mine who used to work at the Golden Nugget said that they would have one of the large conference rooms for a women's team from theMW. They would have all their meetings, meals, and even had a mini weight room in it. They would also have one meal at one of the restaurants every year the first night that they arrived for the tournament. He said that the young ladies always seemed to be enjoying themselves and most of the time represented their school very well. The Pac-12 supposedly cut their tournament costs in half, (Washington) or even more, (California) depending what State the tournament was held prior to coming to Vegas.Well, Vegas is where the Pac-12 women's and men's tournament was played....women played at Michelob Ultra Arena, formerly known as Mandalay Bay Events Center and the men played at the T-Mobile Arena. I can assume both the women's and men's teams had really good food then??
When you consider all the previous misdeeds of the NCAA president, this shouldn't surprise anyone.Do you think the same phrase was in the men’s tournament book?
Nope. It's ridiculous that a team has to win a couple of games in the tournament to get access to weight training equipment. Clearly, the men's teams don't have to do that.Do you think the same phrase was in the men’s tournament book?
Yes. That got old.I found it interesting how the male members of the boneyard tried to change the topic to their food experiences in the service???
Well, if that’s the rule, then that should be applied to USWNT soccer, cuz our women get higher ratings, in the us and internationally. I think the change has to start at the top, and not program the women’s tournament as a second priority, perhaps embed the scheduling of games and not wait to start two days later. Second big action would be to spend equal marketing dollars. Is March Madness (today) bigger for men because of quality of the product (wrestle, wrestle, dunk) or number of marketing dollars? I think I’ve seen literally 100s or 1000s of commercials for the men’s tournament but not sure if I’ve seen any for the women’s tournament, which is a shame, cuz people are missing quite a show.Why the differences? Simple answer, even if you don't like it, the men's tourney generates substantially higher $$$ from the networks due to significantly higher audience ratings. Simple economics to the NCAA brass, however, it gives them a big black eye in the tone def category.
To be fair, we should also compare marketing budgets. If those marketing budgets were equal over a number of years, the top and bottom lines may reach equity, if looked at from a pure business angle.Revenue isn't profit. You have to INVEST to get a return. I'd say that there is quite a disparity between the $ amount invested in the Men's NCAA Tournament vs Women's NCAA Tournament. What would the Women's Tournament be today if the same $ were invested in the Women's Tournament as is invested in the Men's Tournament?
.Well, if that’s the rule, then that should be applied to USWNT soccer, cuz our women get higher ratings, in the us and internationally. I think the change has to start at the top, and not program the women’s tournament as a second priority, perhaps embed the scheduling of games and not wait to start two days later. Second big action would be to spend equal marketing dollars. Is March Madness (today) bigger for men because of quality of the product (wrestle, wrestle, dunk) or number of marketing dollars? I think I’ve seen literally 100s or 1000s of commercials for the men’s tournament but not sure if I’ve seen any for the women’s tournament, which is a shame, cuz people are missing quite a show.
Ooops. I should have read ALL the posts in the thread before posting. Joni Taylor's statement puts a different spin on things, for sure.
I think all that does is spread the responsibility down the line to all the athletic departments for participating teams in the women's tournament and especially those that were sending teams to both.Do you think the same phrase was in the men’s tournament book?